Hi,
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
Simon, where does that forbid one to add words
like thanks, please, would and etc... to even a short answer,
like a FAQ URL???
Feel free to add those, no one forbids it. But seriously, the question
was stupid and the
Von: Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You see, the GIMP is not exactly with exceeding developer resources,
and every single person I see trying to approach the project either
here or over bugzilla gets a rude answer that might have turned then
away for good.
There are canned
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 08:11, Simon Budig wrote:
IMHO, refraining from posts like this could greatly improve the
atmosphere of this list.
It is really up to you to help somebody with answering his
question or not to help, but
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
to simply rememebr the person on the other sidee is sitll a human
being, is not it? Not less human for having less abilities to
compile/hack
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:28:49 +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Simon, where does that forbid one to add words
like thanks, please, would and etc... to even a short answer,
like a FAQ URL???
Nothing forbids that. The
There is a practice within OO bugzilla management (at least with some QA
persons) to 1. thank the bug reporter for his work - whether it is
useless from a developer's POV or not. 2. if it is a well-known bug or
the problem should be known from FAQ or other online document, the link
to this
On 3/19/07, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We aren't using cairo yet. But I don't see what you would want to use
gdk_draw_drawable() for.
OK - I have more to learn!
app/dialogs/dialogs.c, IIRC
Thanks.
Chris
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:21:23 +0100, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
to simply remember the person on the other side is still a human
being, is not it? Not less human for having less abilities to
compile/hack
Acually the thing that struck me was that the answer from Mitch
was not only a little rude (which is unusual for Mitch), it was
also a bad answer -- it doesn't make sense to download the source
code just to find out what language it is written in.
Now if the first thing that occurs to *Mitch* is
Chris,
First off, I want to apologize - it's not my intention to be
combative, and I can be a total ass sometimes.
don't worry, I am also fired up about this one. here is why:
people have talked to me a week or more ago on the irc along the
line of: what's the big deal, one way or another
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Come on, that is simply a rude accusation.
Is it rude? It seems perfectly reasonable and polite to me. Interestingly
Sven seems to find this highly offensive as well. May be you think taking
offense somehow negates the criticism. It seems you both are not too
I really would like to add my point of view to this discussion, sorry
for messing up threading (I had daily digests until just now)
I understand the reply was not in any way meant to be offensive mitch,
but I, as I have stated before on IRC, also think that not very rarely
replies to people who
(oops, sent privately: resending to list)
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:35:30 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You see, the GIMP is not exactly with exceeding developer resources,
and every single person I see trying to approach the project either
here or over bugzilla
Hi Mitch and everybody!
On Tuesday 20 March 2007, Michael Natterer wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 23:35 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
to simply rememebr the person on the other sidee is sitll a human
being, is
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 10:00 -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
Acually the thing that struck me was that the answer from Mitch
was not only a little rude (which is unusual for Mitch), it was
also a bad answer -- it doesn't make sense to download the source
code just to find out what language it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:21:23 +0100, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is not really hard - and that is to you Mitch, you Sven, you Nomis,
to simply remember the person on the other side is still a human
being, is not it? Not less
Hi.
Shlomi Fish ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It took me 10 minutes to write.
Oh wow. Is it just me or is this really a *lot* of time? Personally I'd
consider answering 6 lazy questions per hour a waste of time.
(Sorry for not replying to all of your mail - this just stuck out to me)
Bye,
yep, Gimp's team has its own reputation : not very opened to outside
things. may be this is not completely true, for examplegimp's team has
been opened to join LGM instead of going on with the GimpCons.
I guess nobody is responsible and everyone can be. The fact can Gimp is
a quite huge and
Peter,
I'm glad you've become the ambassador for this. Your
description of a loupe is basically what I was
proposing in my original bugzilla proposal #409802 (
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409802 ).
Rather than add another proposal, why not just flesh
out the details of your vision
You're right, and I appologize for drawing hasty/wrong conclusions, my
prejudices were wrong. Check out this awesome Ruby script though, it
produces some rather interesting output nevertheless.
Martin
:Manish Singh skrev:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 07:36:52PM +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
20 matches
Mail list logo
