Hello,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Alchemie fotografiche
fotocom...@yahoo.it wrote:
I believe there are some artificial limitation to the potential of script
fu, derived by the exigence to categorize the scripts in 2 main categories:
Previous toolbox-scripts that create a new imagine
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 15:36 +0800, C Wang wrote:
So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap.
Comments from any developers appreciated.
I am also in favor of a GPL version upgrade (as could probably be
inferred from
David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com
wrote
I want to make this clear: In English language 'create a new imagine'
is nonsense. imagine is a verb, as in 'I imagine I am eating a juicy
watermelon'; it's an action, not a thing.
'image' is the noun, you can 'create a new image' or 'modify the active
David Gowers 00a...@gmail.com
wrote
I want to make this clear: In English language 'create a new imagine'
is nonsense. imagine is a verb, as in 'I imagine I am eating a juicy
watermelon'; it's an action, not a thing.
'image' is the noun, you can 'create a new image' or 'modify the active
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap.
Comments from any developers appreciated.
The sooner the better as far as I'm concerned.
Rockwalrus
___
Gimp-developer mailing
Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
I believe there are some artificial limitation to the potential of script
fu, derived by the exigence to categorize the scripts in 2 main
categories:
Previous toolbox-scripts that create a new imagine
imagine script that should modify the active imagine
I
From: Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com
I agree with basically all your points but to be honest I
can't see why
anyone would want to use those scripts at all.
Many young download and start using GIMP to make sigs for forum
So their first contact with GIMP include that scripts
As they are
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 12:52 +, Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
I believe there are some artificial limitation to the potential of script
fu, derived by the exigence to categorize the scripts in 2 main
categories:
Previous toolbox-scripts that create a new imagine
imagine script that
Martin Nordholts wrote:
In my opinion these
alpha-to-logo scripts all give unprofessionally looking results (at
least all those I have tried).
Feel free to suggest ways to improve the output from these scripts. Or is it
the general effect the scripts are going for which you don't like alpha
C Wang wrote:
I understand Gimp uses GPLV2 or later statement and thus has no issue
with GPLv3, but I feel it would be better if we can bump it to GPLv3.
If the developers want to change the licence, they can go right ahead and
change it. It makes no difference to me which licence is used.
So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap.
Comments from any developers appreciated.
Liam R E Quin writes:
I think I only have half a dozen lines of code in there,
but in case there's any doubt, it's fine here :)
Likewise for me -- I don't have many lines of code in GIMP
As I was working on i18n, I noticed the following string bug in
app/tools/gimpforegroundselecttool.c:
status = _(Rougly outline the object to extract);
So, here's a tiny patch that fixes it (attached).
David.
Index: app/tools/gimpforegroundselecttool.c
12 matches
Mail list logo
