Hi,
But SIOX is supposed to be more than a selection tool, isn't it? Isn't
it about extracting foreground objects? A selection is not enough for that
when the foreground consists of transparent pixels.
SIOX is a tool to create a selection, nothing more. I don't see what a
foreground
On 09/20/2009 08:19 AM, Gerald Friedland wrote:
A good foreground selection tool would need to get rid of the red in the
pixels with both red and green and only leave slightly transparent green
pixels.
Absolutely. And this is exactly what Jenny has implemented as part of
the Google Summer
On 09/20/2009 09:56 AM, Cristian Secară wrote:
There are several strings that become part of these strings:
_Undo %s
_Redo %s
_Fade %s...
My question is if those strings that replaces %s are unique for this
combination, or they may appear in other places too.
Hi,
No, there is no
jolie wrote:
http://www.mmiworks.net/eng/publications/2009/09/gimp-single-mode.html
Read your blog twice and think all the ideas are great.
ah, thanks.
Commented there too but that was before I read it for the second time.
An idea occurred to me. When you tear of the tabs, or thumbnail
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:30 PM, jolie S for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
Also I've slept on it and given it some more thought and I'd like to ask
again if you would please give having multiple images open at the same time
some more thought.
IMO being able to work on more images at the same time is
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:51 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
Perhaps a split-panel option for single window mode would resolve
this. (I believe we could still only reasonably show a maximum of 2
images at once; this is simply a limitation of the single-window
format AFAICS.)
Do you mean that the
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:00:15PM +0200, jolie S wrote:
For me the big difference is usability.
When I work in GIMP what happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next
to a window of an image I'm working on and all my GIMP windows are not shown
on my screen anymore because I activated
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 20:51 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
Perhaps a split-panel option for single window mode would resolve
this. (I believe we could still only reasonably show a maximum of 2
images at once; this is simply a
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 8:30 PM, jolie S for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
Also I've slept on it and given it some more thought and I'd like to ask
again if you would please give having multiple images open at the same
time
some more thought.
IMO being able to work on more images at the same time is
Daniel Hornung wrote:
I'm not planning to dive deeply into this discussion, but I feel
that Peter's
blog deserves its own thread.
OK, I am picking up the thread here.
as I just commented on the blog post, I am going to address this need
for
windows-in-window and work-side-by-side
this means first finding out the user requirements behind these
requests.
so for everybody who feels this: _why_ do you need windows-in-window or
work-side-by-side?
I've been reading both the blog posts, and the many discussions here
on the mailing list, mainly as an interested user of Gimp.
On Sunday 20 September 2009, peter sikking wrote:
so for everybody who feels this: why do you need windows-in-window or
work-side-by-side?
First of all a great idea to get some more feedback.
I have one thing for which I had wished for side by side windows recently:
When working on the layer
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:36:36 +0300
From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E4tsi?= d...@shadowdrama.net
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 01:00:15PM +0200, jolie S wrote:
For me the big difference is usability. When I work in GIMP what
happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next to a
On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 13:00 +0200, jolie S wrote:
When I work in GIMP what happens to me quite a lot is that I click just next
to a window of an image I'm working on and all my GIMP windows are not shown
on my screen anymore because I activated the application I had visibly open
below the
14 matches
Mail list logo
