I was reading the gimp vision again, and two things jumped out:
- GIMP is easily user-extendable, by easy installation of plug-ins
- GIMP should be easily extensible by the average user: one
click-installation of plug-ins
and was wondering if this could be implemented within the current
codebase
On 05/14/2010 04:13 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
I was reading the gimp vision again, and two things jumped out:
- GIMP is easily user-extendable, by easy installation of plug-ins
- GIMP should be easily extensible by the average user: one
click-installation of plug-ins
and was wondering if
Martin Nordholts writes:
On 05/14/2010 04:13 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
- GIMP should be easily extensible by the average user: one
click-installation of plug-ins
[...]
I agree installation of plug-ins is a pain, but I'm not aware of anyone
planning to work on improving the situation.
On Friday, May 14, 2010, 23:00:46, Akkana Peck wrote:
Writing a file handler like Rob describes sounds easy -- if all you
care about is script-fu. The hard part would getting Python and C
plug-ins installed for users (especially Windows users) who don't
have Python, PyGTK or a C compiler.
On 14.05.2010 23:00, Akkana Peck wrote:
Writing a file handler like Rob describes sounds easy -- if all you
care about is script-fu. The hard part would getting Python and C
plug-ins installed for users (especially Windows users) who don't
have Python, PyGTK or a C compiler.
Getting Python
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Akkana Peck akk...@shallowsky.com wrote:
Martin Nordholts writes:
On 05/14/2010 04:13 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
- GIMP should be easily extensible by the average user: one
click-installation of plug-ins
[...]
I agree installation of plug-ins is a pain,