I did a little experiment last night, creating two rectangles, one of
hue = 240, saturation = 90%, and value = 90%, the other differing only
in saturation, = 50%, i.e., reducing saturation by 40%. Then, from the
Hue/Lightness/Saturation dialogue, I increased the saturation of a
selection in
On 10/02/10 21:10, Melissa Young wrote:
Hi,
I am creating a new image that is 1265 x 1610 pixels. I am making a
photo collage with 9 different pictures. Earlier today I was able to
scale the image to 3.66 (width) x 4.66 (height) pixels.
3.66 x 4.66 pixels makes no sense--that's about
eBay has been notified of both the possible license infringement and
also of what they call fee avoidance--charging almost nothing for the
product, a percentage of which goes to eBay, and making their money on
their exorbitant shipping charges, on which eBay makes nothing. Between
these two
On 11/20/09 07:01, Jerry Baker wrote:
I keep running into the limits of gimp python so I've finally decided to
start learning C. In python the development process is a lot faster.
Basically Edit File Save Run. - There are a lot more steps
involved on the C side...
I was wondering if anyone
On 09/11/09 12:46, harold wrote:
Hi,
We are making pretty good progress towards GIMP 2.8 which has turned
into an everything but GEGL release. I think it would make sense to
also go for a single-window mode in 2.8 and not 2.10 as originally
planned.
By doing this we will be able to focus
yet to figure out the weirdness where, if you
miss the starting pixel and it seems to go into polygonal select mode,
it starts rotating and scaling the selected region in bizarre ways.
Thanks,
Chris Moller
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer
On 09/09/09 08:29, phanisvara das wrote:
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 05:50:05 pm Chris Moller wrote:
s there an option somewhere to put the Free Select tool back in it's
older mode of behaviour? The newer business of having to end
continuous-line select exactly on the starting pixel
to be emphasised/ in forward slashes.
Chris Moller
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
So there is obstacle, indeed. And till now I have no idea how to solve
this.
Might be a bit of a wild branch on this topic, but I'm wondering if all
the effects described here could be implemented as a /subtractive/ process.
I haven't looked at gimp's
Maciej Pilichowski wrote:
Hello,
I was asked to bring this issue to the ML instead of discussing it
on bugzilla so here we go.
Original post:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553003
Please, provide transparent color or in other words -- treat
transparency _also_ as a
KishoreKumar Bairi wrote:
Hello folks,
I recently migrated from Photoshop to Gimp. Though GIMP is offering
powerful functionalities, its way of opening each window of each image
is bugging me a lot. My entire taskbar is filled up with GIMP
windows.I'm really looking forward to see all gimp
,not
P.S.S.S. Sorry...
which would be Post-script-script-script, for which a case might be
made in bash or some such language, but not in English.
/annoying_pedantic_mode
Sorry,
Chris Moller, Language Cop to the Programming World
___
Gimp-developer mailing
"make -j" without a numeric argument will overwhelm most machines
fairly quickly in complex makes. Since you're running a dual-core
machine, try "make -j3" or "make -j4". This will limit the number of
concurrent processes to something reasonable and provide decent load
balancing between
,
Chris Moller
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
14 matches
Mail list logo