On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:24 PM, peter sikking wrote:
- when painting, first I feel that this outline is a lousy
representative
for a brush. next I notice that getting the 'brush' out of the way and
showing the immediate paint result rules. so now I am thinking:
what about no outline at
hi,
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:24 PM, peter sikking wrote:
- when painting, first I feel that this outline is a lousy
representative
for a brush. next I notice that getting the 'brush' out of the way and
showing the immediate paint result rules. so now I am
Alexandre wrote:
What exactly do you mean?
OK, I'll try to be clearer:
mouse up/not painting/just hovering over the canvas:
show the real brush pixmap, with all the contrast we can muster
vs. the canvas under it, 100% true opacity for each stamp pixel,
reflecting brush, scale, aspect ratio,
That would be fine if GIMP only supported mouse click painting, not
dragging. When one moves mouse while painting seeing brush outline and
borders of analyzed area for healing brush is useful.
peter sikking wrote:
mouse down/painting/stroking on the canvas:
the applied 'paint' is the
Alexander Rabtchevich wrote:
That would be fine if GIMP only supported mouse click painting, not
dragging. When one moves mouse while painting seeing brush outline
and borders of analyzed area for healing brush is useful.
peter sikking wrote:
mouse down/painting/stroking on the canvas:
hi,
peter sikking wrote:
- it is fantastic to see a fuzzy/grunge brush as a real
copy of the actual brush when one is not painting, but it has to
_contrast_ with what is under it or else it just disappears. When it
contrasts (some X-OR variation, or so) I think it should not be semi
hi,
David Gowers wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Rob Antonishen
rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter-
To clarify, you are suggesting the on screen pointer icon/sprite could
show the actual brush as it would look painted with a single mouse
click, but once painting/holding the
(peter) yahvuu wrote:
what about printing a semi transparent copy of the actual brush
on the
canvas?
exactly what I thought.
Even though I think the patch made the brush outline better for
fuzzy brushes, it is still not without flaws. Let's ignore the
patch and aim for the above
second try sending this...
(peter) yahvuu wrote:
what about printing a semi transparent copy of the actual brush
on the
canvas?
exactly what I thought.
Even though I think the patch made the brush outline better for
fuzzy brushes, it is still not without flaws. Let's ignore the
Peter-
To clarify, you are suggesting the on screen pointer icon/sprite could
show the actual brush as it would look painted with a single mouse
click, but once painting/holding the mouse down it would render as a
cross hair? And once the mouse is released it would turn back to a
static sprite?
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Rob Antonishen
rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter-
To clarify, you are suggesting the on screen pointer icon/sprite could
show the actual brush as it would look painted with a single mouse
click, but once painting/holding the mouse down it would render as
Hi all,
Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 09/01/2009 07:29 PM, peter sikking wrote:
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
what about printing a semi transparent copy of the actual brush on the
canvas?
exactly what I thought.
Even though I think the patch made the brush outline better for fuzzy
brushes,
If you want to test-drive the look and feel, here's a flash applet
featuring various outline designs:
http://sites.google.com/site/yahvuu/stuff/brushtester-web.lzx.swf8.swf?attredirects=0
This is the good approach : prototype, test and decide. Thanks a lot for the
flash test.
I personnaly
On 09/09/2009 09:39 PM, Steren wrote:
If you want to test-drive the look and feel, here's a flash applet
featuring various outline designs:
http://sites.google.com/site/yahvuu/stuff/brushtester-web.lzx.swf8.swf?attredirects=0
This is the good approach : prototype, test and
On 09/01/2009 07:29 PM, peter sikking wrote:
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
what about printing a semi transparent copy of the actual brush on the
canvas?
exactly what I thought.
Even though I think the patch made the brush outline better for fuzzy brushes,
it is still not without flaws.
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
what about printing a semi transparent copy of the actual brush on the
canvas?
exactly what I thought.
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 5:57 PM, yahvuu wrote:
hi,
what about using a dashed outline for fuzzy brushes?
This is more or less what gogh has: two circles to represent
fuzzyness. It was really really useful.
Alexandre
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:11:32AM +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
This is more or less what gogh has: two circles to represent
fuzzyness. It was really really useful.
I think in gogh the two circles represent the brush radius at minimum and
maximum pressure, not the fuzziness.
bye,
Martin
what about printing a semi transparent copy of the actual brush on the
canvas? Is it possible?
The ghosted brush can have two opacities, one for the preview when the
tool isn't in use, and one more transparent when the tool is in use.
I wouldn't mind to have a simple circle of the size of the
Hi
I think the current brush outline for fuzzy brushes is too big. The
attached patch improves the brush outline for fuzzy brushes (see
screenshot [1]). If using a higher threshold doesn't result in any
outline at all, the patch fallbacks to the old brush outline so that a
brush outline
Hi all,
My opinion about that is the same as shirakawa if we want to do photography
retouch and superexact works like these, but artisticaly i would prefer
something like Martin says. It is more useful for the eye, if we want to
make an stroke fast and not acuratly but in the aprox right place.the
hi,
what about using a dashed outline for fuzzy brushes?
perhaps like a) in
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/fuzzy-outline.png
I think it's rewarding to visually mark fuzzy outlines / feathered selections,
as it opens the path for on-canvas adjustments -- as has been pointed out on
the
On Sunday 30 August 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
[1] http://www.chromecode.com/temp/improve-fuzzy-brush-outline.png
One more thing that has always irritated me (not related to your change
though): The lower-left - upper right lines (/) seem to use a different
corner case of the same algorithm
yahvuu wrote:
hi,
what about using a dashed outline for fuzzy brushes?
perhaps like a) in
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/fuzzy-outline.png
This is a very good idea, but I think it would be more logic and
consistent with the style of brush outlines in GIMP if it was the
hi,
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
yahvuu wrote:
hi,
what about using a dashed outline for fuzzy brushes?
perhaps like a) in
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/fuzzy-outline.png
This is a very good idea, but I think it would be more logic and
consistent with the style of brush outlines
Hello Martin,
once i suggested at GIMP brainstorm painting two lines for fuzzy brushes
and feather borders.
One dotted where pacity = 100% and on with just any secound dot where
opacity = 0%.
A center mark would be great too.
So artists know where is the center of the stroke (may for
On Sunday 30 August 2009 22:30:54 Eckhard M. Jäger wrote:
Hello Martin,
once i suggested at GIMP brainstorm painting two lines for fuzzy brushes
and feather borders.
One dotted where pacity = 100% and on with just any secound dot where
opacity = 0%.
A center mark would be great too.
There
27 matches
Mail list logo
