On 07/23/2009 05:38 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello,
I was about to write a rather detailed interface/feature improvement
suggestion about the brush editing feature in GIMP but then I thought
that first it would be better to show you all this (incomplete)
interface mock-up I made:
Hi
On 07/26/2009 05:45 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
This is something that I, as an user, would like to have.
It also seems to save some screen space when editing on a notebook
that can do only 1024x768 too :-)
This is a smaller version I made which shows that at
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported
by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look good.
Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too since
anything lower than that resolution is rather old gear.
On Sunday 26 July 2009 11:02:30 SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported
by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look
good.
Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too
Alexia Death wrote:
Id have to agree with this one. I namely own a laptop with this resolution. I
havent had any problems using gimp on it tho and I hope it stays that way.
Yes, by keeping two dockable areas (left and right side of the screen)
as by default, a 1440x900 resolution enables to
On Sunday 26 July 2009 11:02:30 SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size
supported
by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or
look
good.
Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I would just like to point out that the smallest screen size supported
by GIMP is 1280x1024, so we don't need to make 1024x768 work or look
good.
SHIRAKAWA Akira writes:
Yes, I've read that many times and I would agree with it too since
anything lower than that
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Yes, my proposition is to unify all of those.
And this is a mock-up of my idea of how the toolbar would end up looking
like by merging many tools into one:
http://i25.tinypic.com/2ihxyd5.png
--
SHIRAKAWA Akira
___
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello,
I tried putting together my ideas I wrote about in this thread, in a
single image. The result is an Inkscape-like SDI GIMP
I know that in the medium term one of the main goal will be an SDI
interface, and that would work very well with the improvements I have in
Hi!
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 8:19 AM, SHIRAKAWA
Akirashirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
New interface and improvements mock-up link:
http://i31.tinypic.com/2qjd55k.png
This is something that I, as an user, would like to have.
It also seems to save some screen space when editing on a notebook
that
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
This is something that I, as an user, would like to have.
It also seems to save some screen space when editing on a notebook
that can do only 1024x768 too :-)
This is the annotated version I sent to the GIMP UI brainstorm blog. It
doesn't add much more than what
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
This is something that I, as an user, would like to have.
It also seems to save some screen space when editing on a notebook
that can do only 1024x768 too :-)
This is a smaller version I made which shows that at 1024x768 (and
possibly at even lower resolutions)
I think this is a very good idea -- moving the 'different ways of painting'
into brushes so that we don't need Paintbrush, Pencil, Airbrush but just one
: 'Paintbrush'. I use GIMP mainly for pixel art, and I find that I really
want the paintbrush/pencil/airbrush tool distinction to go away, so I
- Leave the old tool selection concept to the new taggable brush
selection window
With a new generic brush system in most of the brush behavior is
described by the brush settings, it's possible to leave the old tool
selection concept to the new (and possibly even more improved)
taggable
David Gowers wrote:
What do you mean here? I think we need at least these paint tools:
Paint (this would be able to do all of what Pencil, Paintbrush, and
Airbrush do currently, and perhaps also Eraser), Ink (this does not use
'brushes'), Clone (also Heal?) , Perspective Clone ,
David Gowers wrote:
I considered that modes might be how you meant to implement it. That is
definitely a large change in the way the user would use paint tools, we
should get Peter Sikking's input here for sure.
Most users wouldn't normally have to play with those details.
There could be a
Hello,
I was about to write a rather detailed interface/feature improvement
suggestion about the brush editing feature in GIMP but then I thought
that first it would be better to show you all this (incomplete)
interface mock-up I made:
http://i32.tinypic.com/1zwdwts.png
Basically, in my
On 07/23/2009 05:38 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello,
I was about to write a rather detailed interface/feature improvement
suggestion about the brush editing feature in GIMP but then I thought
that first it would be better to show you all this (incomplete)
interface mock-up I made:
Hi
Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi Akira,
I suppose you haven't seen
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Paint_dynamics_specification ?
Hi Martin,
Yes, I've already seen that! The idea (which I have not yet described in
the opening message) is that each Dynamics button (those with the arrow
inside)
On 07/23/2009 06:17 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Would you like me to write more in detail and be more specific regarding
this?
Absolutely, I mean why would you hold it back?
BR,
Martin
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello,
I was about to write a rather detailed interface/feature improvement
suggestion about the brush editing feature in GIMP but then I thought
that first it would be better to show you all this (incomplete)
interface mock-up I made:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
Absolutely, I mean why would you hold it back?
Because in its entirety my vision is an extensive change not only in
brush selecting and editing compared to the current versions, but also
in many aspects of the user interface (depending on how much of it would
be
Patrick Horgan wrote:
Very cool! I'd only add a save button on the bottom right so that this
combination of settings could be saved as a named button if desired.
Yes, as I wrote, it's still very incomplete and I made this basically to
show that the brush editing window could include many
23 matches
Mail list logo
