On Monday 01 August 2005 13:01, Akkana Peck wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris writes:
I am not so sure about Image-Modes , unless tehre is a ubmenu
Colors-Image to indicate taht thos ewill operate ont eh whole
image instead of a drawable. But then, they could just stay were
they are.
How
Perhaps mode isn't the most descriptive word for the feature.
A word like Gamut might be more appropriate.
_-T
___
Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
Unlimited Internet Access with 250MB of Email Storage.
Visit
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:16:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps mode isn't the most descriptive word for the feature.
A word like Gamut might be more appropriate.
(coming out of lurk)
Heh, while we're at it, can we get palettes with 256 colors? ;^)
(going back into lurk)
-bill!
I am fine with Layers Colors and FIlters integration, if submenus are
used in an efficeint way.
I am not so sure about Image-Modes , unless tehre is a ubmenu
Colors-Image to indicate taht thos ewill operate ont eh whole image
instead of a drawable. But then, they could just stay were they are.
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris writes:
I am not so sure about Image-Modes , unless tehre is a ubmenu
Colors-Image to indicate taht thos ewill operate ont eh whole image
instead of a drawable. But then, they could just stay were they are.
How about calling it Image Mode rather than just Mode?
On Monday 01 August 2005 13:01, Akkana Peck wrote:
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris writes:
I am not so sure about Image-Modes , unless tehre is a ubmenu
Colors-Image to indicate taht thos ewill operate ont eh whole
image instead of a drawable. But then, they could just stay were
they are.
I've posted a patch to bug 116145 which would move all the color
operations -- currently in Image/Mode, Layers/Colors, and
Filters/Colors -- to a new top-level menu called Colors.
(See the bug for the request and discussion of that.)
If I don't hear any objections I'll commit it in a day or so.
