Hi,
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 20:03 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
I agree that someone should sit down and specify exactly how we want
color management to work before doing major surgery.
Yes. We absolutely need a document that describes the workflows that are
handled by the current
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 05:52 +0900, Yoshinori Yamakawa wrote:
See the following image:
http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status_comparison.png
In case of using the GIMP and any other softwares, handling the image without
color profile is very important.
Ah, I
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 20:24:34 +0100
Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
Untagged RGB will be confused with tagging for data resources.
We should better use a title like No Embedded Color Profile.
Untagged is used in Adobe Photoshop.
I think that the other phrase may be used, but, individually, I
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 23:03 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
So I can go ahead and revert this commit then? (rev 23135):
2007-08-07 Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org
* plug-ins/common/png.c (save_image): in the absence of an
embedded color profile, write the sRGB chunk.
On Sunday 08 February 2009 08:39:38 am Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 06:44 +0900, Yoshinori Yamakawa wrote:
I wrote a small patch for checking embedded profile .
http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/files/profile_status.diff
Example 1: Image has no profiles
On Sun, 08 Feb 2009 17:39:38 +0100
Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
I don't quite understand what this patch is supposed to do. The display
of color profile information in the Image Properties dialog is already
there. What does your patch add? To me it looks like the dialog only
becomes more
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I'd like to discuss
some potential issues in the color profile embedding strategy.
Currently (correct me if I'm wrong) the procedure for images without
embedded profile is to silently embed the working RGB profile upon
opening.
What do you think?
Hi
I think
Hi,
I wrote a small patch for checking embedded profile .
http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/files/profile_status.diff
Example 1: Image has no profiles
http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status1.png
Example 2: Open the gray-scaled image that has Dot Gain 15% profile
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 09:41 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
I think we should have behave like this:
* Color profiles shall only be embedded/referenced in an exported/saved
image if there is a color profile attached to the GimpImage
* When opening an image without a color profile
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 09:41 +0100, Martin Nordholts wrote:
I think we should have behave like this:
* Color profiles shall only be embedded/referenced in an exported/saved
image if there is a color profile attached to the GimpImage
* When opening an image
Yoshinori Yamakawa wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a small patch for checking embedded profile .
http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/files/profile_status.diff
Example 1: Image has no profiles
http://cue.yellowmagic.info/softwares/images/gimp_profile_status1.png
Example 2: Open the gray-scaled image
Hi.
I don't know if this can be considered as a bug, but I'd like to discuss
some potential issues in the color profile embedding strategy.
Currently (correct me if I'm wrong) the procedure for images without
embedded profile is to silently embed the working RGB profile upon
opening.
This can be
Hi!!
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Guillermo Espertino
gespert...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
I don't know if this can be considered as a bug, but I'd like to discuss
some potential issues in the color profile embedding strategy.
Currently (correct me if I'm wrong) the procedure for images without
13 matches
Mail list logo
