Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Bug 132698 - Script-Fu constants vs DB Browser

2004-02-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another way to look at this is from he point of view of help/documentation. Someone has to create information somewhere that documents the constants used for plug-ins (whether they be C-based, Script-Fu, or Perl). Are you talking about the API docs

Re: [Gimp-developer] [patch]Gimp plug-in template 1.3.2 won't compile

2004-02-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: To clarify, I have started looking at porting Guash to the 2.0 API. I didn't know if anyone else is doing it but I would like it and it would be a good learning exercise. I wanted to have the sample plug-in to look at as a template. Given the state

Re: [Gimp-developer] [patch]Gimp plug-in template 1.3.2 won't compile

2004-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
At 08:48 AM 02/02/2004, Sven wrote: Given the state of the guash code and that it never got the reputation of being stable, I'd advocate to write a new plug-in instead of attempting to port this code. I've been playing with a thumbnail browser plug-in to make some more use of libgimpthumb. The

[Gimp-developer] Changes needed to DB Browser content?

2004-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
At 08:24 PM 01/30/2004, Marc Lehmann wrote: Constant names are a much smaller difference than calling conventions between languages. It is, in general, impossible to use an API for one language in another without adapting it to the target language. [snip] I'd also find it cool if you looked into

Re: [Gimp-developer] Changes needed to DB Browser content?

2004-02-02 Thread pcg
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:49:21PM -0500, Kevin Cozens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DB Browser should be consistent for one language even if its just the abstract PDB language. I don't think it should have different 'modes' to have it show things depending on a user selectable plug-in language.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Changes needed to DB Browser content?

2004-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
At 12:58 PM 02/02/2004, Marc Lehmann wrote: Constant names for one thing, I thought? Do you have any specific examples in mind I can look at to see what it shows. An idea of what you think it should show would also be useful. During normal development, examples are a hundred times better than

[Gimp-developer] Path tool problems

2004-02-02 Thread Juhana Sadeharju
Hello. Has anyone else found the path tool hard to use? IMHO, the usability is very low there. If I choose to make first a polyline and then adjust the curve, the curve type seems to be unsuitable. The curve goes easily to serpent. If I choose to make the curve progressively, I have to switch

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Update

2004-02-02 Thread raymond ostertag
Aside from that, there's lots of stuff happenning outside CVS too... the help team recently did a pre-release of the gimp-help-2 module, and it's looking very good. Roman, Daniel, Raymond, Niklas, Sven and everyone else who is working on the help right now are doing a great job.

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP Update

2004-02-02 Thread raymond ostertag
Aside from that, there's lots of stuff happenning outside CVS too... the help team recently did a pre-release of the gimp-help-2 module, and it's looking very good. Roman, Daniel, Raymond, Niklas, Sven and everyone else who is working on the help right now are doing a great job.

[Gimp-developer] Updated script to convert Script-Fu scripts to 2.0 API

2004-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
Greetings. For those of you working with Script-Fu scripts for the GIMP, I have made a minor change to the Perl script I wrote to update scripts from the 1.2 to the 2.0 API. The latest change allows named constants to be recognized (and updated as needed) regardless of whether they use _ or -.

[Gimp-developer] Patch to remove deprecated constants from standard scripts

2004-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
Greetings. I have a patch which removes all of the deprecated named constants from the Script-Fu based scripts which are part of a standard GIMP installation. I haven't attached the patch to this message since it is a bit over 50,000 bytes. The patch file is available with the following URL:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch to remove deprecated constants from standard scripts

2004-02-02 Thread Henrik Brix Andersen
Hi, On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 00:33, Kevin Cozens wrote: [snip] If necessary, I can create a bug report in bugzilla and attach the patch to the report. Please do that - bugzilla helps us track bugs along with patches and enhancement requests much better than a mailing list does. Sincerely, Brix

[Gimp-developer] ANNOUNCE: gimp-plugin-template 1.3.3

2004-02-02 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, some late changes to the GIMP 2.0 API made it necessary to do another 1.3 release of the gimp-plugin-template package. Version 1.3.3 is compatible with the latest 2.0 prereleases and can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/plugin-template The gimp-plugin-template is essentially

[Gimp-developer] Reminder: GUADEC 2004 Call for Papers

2004-02-02 Thread David Neary
Hi all, The closing date for submitting abstracts for papers to be presented at GUADEC is now only 2 weeks away. Anyone why is planning on giving a talk should send in an abstract (it doesn't have to be professional, just a short description of what you want to present) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as

Re: [Gimp-developer] Patch to remove deprecated constants from standard scripts

2004-02-02 Thread Kevin Cozens
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 18:42, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: Please do that - bugzilla helps us track bugs along with patches and enhancement requests much better than a mailing list does. Done. The patch affects 48 different scripts. It will allow for the eventual removal of some code in