On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 05:56:43PM +0100, Adam D. Moss wrote:
(we've enjoyed peripheral use of some of their services
such as CVS for a while).
my personal experience with gnome cvs is really bad.
i am paraphrasing one of the developers i have a great deal of respect
for (paraphrasing since
Hi,
J. Grant wrote:
Hi, I wonder if there is any way I can donate money towards development
of a specific feature addition in GIMP?
We are currently working out two things which may be of interest - first, we are
working to have a way to make tax deductible donations to the GIMP via another
Hi Dan,
Daniel Rogers wrote:
And if you are not a non-profit you need to pay
taxes, wether or not you make money. (and if GIMP joins GNOME and
abandons TGF, I'm the one that has to pay the 800 dollar minimum tax, I
might add).
I think that everyone should pool in together to pay this. I have
Carol Spears wrote:
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 08:04:04PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
(we use their toolkit and
infrastructure, a few years ago they used to use our toolkit),
did the name change?
as far as i know it is still the gimp tool kit.
There are only a very small number of people who really
Hi Bartekk,
Bartekk wrote:
i have a question about the development of plug-in.
I want to use the plugin template u can get from the gimp site.
The problem is I don't know which files are important.
If I want to write a simple Gaussian Filter, how can I do that.
Is there somebody who can give
Hi,
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
Well, I think we should discuss the road map (or whatever you prefer to
call it) for the release to come after 2.2 (2.4? 3.0?). We need to talk
about stuff like PDB rewrite, GEGL integration, next generation XCF,
plug-in policies etc.
Is anyone actually working on
On 2 May 2004, at 23:24, Carol Spears wrote:
not using doc format was a really good suggestion,
The solutions mankind has come up with to increase readability are
diverse, and range from using open document formats to using capitals
at the beginning of sentences and for the word 'I'. I
Hi everyone,
I've been asked by an OS X user if there's any chance of an OS X version
of my CMYK plugin (at http://www.blackfiveservices.co.uk/separate.shtml).
I don't have access to an OS X machine, so if there's any developer here
who does and is willing to help out, please contact me.
All
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bartekk wrote:
i have a question about the development of plug-in.
I want to use the plugin template u can get from the gimp site. The
problem is I don't know which files are important. If I want to
write a simple Gaussian Filter, how can I do
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are only a very small number of people who really believe this
to be still the case. It may still be called the GIMP Toolkit (but
more more I've heard it called the GNOME Toolkit), but that is a
historical nod. The GIMP Toolkit is less a GIMP
Hi,
Bartekk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have a question about the development of plug-in. I want to use
the plugin template u can get from the gimp site. The problem is I
don't know which files are important. If I want to write a simple
Gaussian Filter, how can I do that.
For such a
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://gimp-plug-ins.sourceforge.net/doc/Writing/html/plug-in.html
I don't think we should point people to this document any longer. It's
outdated and should better be removed. http://developer.gimp.org/ is
where we are collecting more
Hi,
Daniel Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See the problem I see with the GINPOG attitude and joining GNOME is
that we are saying we are willing to take your money and your time and
your developers, but we are not willing to actually show any support
for you in any way. It's kinda
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As part of preparing my guadec talk on writing a GIMP plug-in, I plan
to update this document, so I'd prefer if it didn't get deleted just
yet. In addition, it's quite nicely written with a type of tutorial
feel, and it doesn't really
Hi,
Stephan Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
to run two gimps at the same time now. The old one to do refocus and
the new one for everything else. It's consuming lots of memory too
so I would really like to see refocus working with 2.0. Any ideas or
hints what to do or check next? Hoping it
Hi,
here's another summary of what's happening in the HEAD branch, what do
watch out for if you want to join development and where help is
needed...
Mitch has almost finished the port of the menus to GtkUIManager. The
new code is in use now and seems to work fine. The only remaining
regression
On Monday 03 May 2004 13:39, Stephan Menzel wrote:
G'day!
On Sunday 02 May 2004 21:32, Jean-Luc wrote:
There is a patch for refocus on sourceforge.
If was built for 1.3 but I have applied it and, with this patch applied,
the plugin works for me [tm] with gimp 2.0.1.
You can find the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 03 May 2004 17:02, Ernst Lippe wrote:
I think that I have found cause of the Stephan's problem.
My plugin used GTK-2, so in the makefiles I had to use some
tricks to get the correct include path and libraries. I could
not directly use
Hi,
Stephan Menzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gimptool caused problems during configure and I tried several
workarounds that seemed to work in the first place but this was some
kind of wishful thinking.
I did not have time to look at the patch at sourceforge, but it seems like
Stephan is
Sven Neumann wrote:
It's not that we wouldn't put a lot of effort into making GIMP work
well on a GNOME desktop. Adhering to FreeDesktop standards is one of
our goals and we are even working towards full GNOME HIG compliance.
The only things we really want to avoid is to be forced to do any of
Daniel Rogers wrote:
David Neary wrote:
Are there any people opposed to closer ties with the GNOME
Foundation?
Well, GIMP is not part of GNOME, and this assertion was made repeatedly
over the years. Apart from labeling GIMP more of a GNOME program, I
wouldn't oppose (but I don't count much anyway
Hi,
Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thne fears that I - as a Win32 user - have are that by moving closer
to GNOME, GIMP might become too linux-centric. If those fears are
unjustified, I'd be glad to presented the facts that render them
invalid.
No facts, but since GIMP works
On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are only a very small number of people who really believe this
to be still the case. It may still be called the GIMP Toolkit (but
more more I've heard it called the GNOME Toolkit), but that is a
Hi Sven,
IMHO, the plugins could be left un-bound to any window as they are atm.
Or is there a hard coded underlying attachment between the plugin and
parent windows required for it all to work?
Are you saying that plug-in dialogs should be handled differently than
core dialogs? If we want to
On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
PS: See http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-new-image-dialog.png for an almost
HIG compliant file-new dialog. This is a screenshot from the HEAD
branch.
Looks fantastic! I really like the hideaway Image Comment section.
Here are just a few minor suggestions
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Well, dgo was started to finally give an alternative to this outdated
sourceforge site, so please consider to help with dgo instead. It's in
CVS, you have write access, feel free to improve it.
Do you have to run
Hi all,
I was just looking for some nice looking screenshots to show off
on the GUADEC GIMP pages, and the best ones are all on
developer.gimp.org
It would be really cool to have lots lots of screenshots of the
GIMP on www.gimp.org. Could someone from the web team take
responsibility for this
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I didn't address yet is the fact that the HIG suggests to
left-align labels of UI controls while we currently consistenly
right-align labels so that they are close to the control they are
describing. I am not sure if I can follow the
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right-justify the contents of spin boxes, unless the convention in
the user's locale demands otherwise.
AFAIK GTK+ doesn't provide an API for this.
Its just my opinion, but I think showing 3 places of precision past
the decimal for
On 4 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I didn't address yet is the fact that the HIG suggests to
left-align labels of UI controls while we currently consistenly
right-align labels so that they are close to the control they are
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I was just looking for some nice looking screenshots to show off
on the GUADEC GIMP pages, and the best ones are all on
developer.gimp.org
The problem with the screenshots on dgo is that they are screenshots
of the 1.3.x development version. Most of
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
The forward direction (menu XML to wiki text) should be trivial
with xslt - the other way would probably be easier with perl or
something.
That's funny, I think of wiki - menu as being the forward direction. :)
Weird. Perhaps you're sufferring an LSD
Hi,
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PS: See http://sven.gimp.org/gimp-new-image-dialog.png for an almost
HIG compliant file-new dialog. This is a screenshot from the HEAD
branch.
Looks fantastic! I really like the hideaway Image Comment section.
Here are just a
On Sat, 1 May 2004, David Neary wrote:
Hi all,
Myself and Dan Rogers will be meeting with someone from the GNOME
Foundation this week with the intention of having greater
co-operation with them on things like money.
For the moment, I am working under the supposition that the best
option
[EMAIL PROTECTED] accidentally forgot to cc the mailing list. Forwarded
with his permission.
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 16:53:32 -0500
From: Seth Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] new file-new dialog (Was:
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Seth Burgess wrote:
Also, from the HIG:
Its just my opinion, but I think showing 3 places of precision past
the decimal for resolution is a bit excessive and I would hazard
rarely adds any useful information.
Good point.
I disagree on the vertical separator - I think
On Sun, 2 May 2004, David Neary wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GimpMenuReorganization
Very nice. I wonder if there's a way to convert between the menu XML
files and the Wiki content. That would make it possible to
On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
here's another summary of what's happening in the HEAD branch, what do
watch out for if you want to join development and where help is
needed...
Mitch has almost finished the port of the menus to GtkUIManager. The
new code is in use now and seems to
On 3 May 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, dgo was started to finally give an alternative to this outdated
sourceforge site, so please consider to help with dgo instead. It's in
CVS, you have write access, feel free to improve it.
Do you have to run
39 matches
Mail list logo
