On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 05:59, Branko Collin wrote:
On 28 Mar 2002, at 11:02, Sven Neumann wrote:
I heard that Gobe Productive (http://www.gobe.com/) ships with
plug-ins based on source code from The GIMP and sent them a letter
asking for source code. I'm forwarding their answer here...
Sven Neumann wrote:
We actually had something else in mind but since you don't seem to be
interested I won't waste my time explaining our ideas.
It is very sad to see that Sven thinks that Robin Rowe is the only
person to whom his ideas should be told. Pity the rest of the GIMP
developers
Sven Neumann wrote:
Christopher W. Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The nice thing about this is that it should be fully parseable by XML
parsers (up until the first NULL [1 is required, the rest are optional
I don't think the format you proposed is valid XML. There might be XML
Rule #1 in
Manish Singh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:06:12PM -0400, Christopher Curtis wrote:
Rule #1 in brainstorming: don't criticise any idea, no matter how silly.
So much for rules...
Another downside: needing a special tool to manipulate it.
Well, now, I want to end this silliness right here
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
But you couldn't use any generic XML tools like validators or XSL
transformations. If we go for XML we should really make sure that we
make it proper XML, otherwise XML doesn't make sense at all. We could
then as well go for a sexp syntax. Actually the latter would be a
Ok ..
I want to apologise to everyone for overreacting. After a brief moment
of reflection, a simple container has notable advantages over a single
file, not to mention that a one of my assumptions didn't make sense.
Where is there documentation on the ar format? I can't seem to find
any.
Alan Horkan wrote:
It is far better not to XML at all than to break XML.
(incidentally this is similar to what has been suggested for Cinepaint).
Just for the record ... I read the CinePaint file format, and it doesn't
even resemble XML. My PREAMBLE is valid XML. If they implement what
they
Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
Yes, calling the new release 2.0 is a LIE. I cannot emphasize this
strongly enough. It is a lie because we have told many, many people what
2.0 will do. To release a 2.0 without these features is pure
misrepresentation. It is much too late to put the worms back into
Sven Neumann wrote:
Nathan Carl Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For funding requests for GIMPCon in Norway, it will be very useful to
have cost estimates for the event for the GIMP.
Could everyone planning to go to Kristiansand send an estimate of how
much money they will need to get there?
It
GSR - FR wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-04-22 at 2052.21 +0200):
This would, of course, make selection CSG operations more difficult.
Simon said that implementing CSG operations on vectors would be not
feasible.
Ok, maybe you misunderstood me or I expressed it the wrong way: It would
of course
Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
From: Christopher W. Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would it be possible to solve this issue by placing transient corners
on the image?
It perhaps would not be a good idea if the original corner would
move when the equivalent transient corner is moved.
I agree ... did I suggest
Hello,
This is just a random thought off the top of my head, but maybe it will
inspire someone...
It would probably be very cool if the preview functionality could be
implemented so that it could also act as a filter.
Such that, for instance, someone could grab a looking glass and
attach an
Manish Singh wrote:
snipped out: the fact that clueless Robin completely missed the point that
there was plenty of refactoring done into GPL libraries, quite independent
of the PDB infastructure.
[...]
misinformation about the GIMP project. He completely deserves to be called
on his lack of
Sven Neumann wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on the following plan for the Blur
plug-in
(details are in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142318):
The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality.
[...]
So the question is, is anyone actually using this
functionality? Are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think a lot of people would prefer a scrolling menubar over
the ability to always reach the image menu using the right mouse
button.
Those who are new wouldn't know to right-click, and their voice
is not heard here. If we want GIMP to gain popularity, it has
to
Sven Neumann wrote:
Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perhaps we should just swap the Shift and Ctrl modifiers for display
scrolling to be consistent with the HIG and across graphics apps.
Sounds like a good idea. Let's do this for 2.4.
Two questions about the current GIMP behavior
I hope I'm not showing my lack of UI skills here, but:
On 9/26/06, Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 02:17:34PM -0700, William Skaggs wrote:
From: Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While doing so I noticed they are all bad and inconsistent.
Indexed images are
On 9/27/06, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a different issue from what was discussed here. You can toggle
between moving layers, selection masks or paths by using the modifiers:
Ctrl or Alt (this will soon be indicated in the status bar). I don't
How will this be indicated?
On 1/26/07, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:33 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was pretty trivial but not obvious at first since gimp uses autotools
in a non-standard way.
Where exactly was the problem in using a different --prefix and
how does GIMP
Hi, general comments:
The tone of the GIMP mailing list has improved dramatically over the
years (long time lurker here) and I would assert that it is generally
very reasonable.
However, language barriers can cause problems and special care should
be taken when this is obviously the case. Also,
On 3/30/07, David Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We already get Gimpshop users coming to the mailing lists asking for help and,
Would it be a good idea to embrace these users as well? Gimpshop may
be a non-supported hack, but hosting a Gimpshop-specific list may
provide insight into a larger
On 5/20/07, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will try to raise this with the Metacity project.
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/05/20/save-changes-integrated-3/
I don't think you want to go too far down this path. A significant
portion of GIMP users run Windows and WMs other than
On 10/28/07, Robert Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Micahel Grosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As an alternative, I'd like to suggest a UI setup I filched from
Erdas Imagine (a GIS app). It sort-of emulates the Mac OS idea of
starting
On 10/28/07, Robert Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christopher Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Micahel Grosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
here's the mockup (I made it long ago):
http://www.geocities.com/preacher_mg/UI_gimp_menu.png
I think the easiest way
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Michael Grosberg
grosberg.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to install 2.6.4 (or any other bugfix version or developer
snapshot) on Ubuntu? Are there alternate software sources that should be
specified? If so, what are they and can they be added to the
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
Please let's not bombard the UI with modal dialogs. They are excellent
for interrupting workflows and annoying users. The proper solution is to
make changing the comment dirty the image, it is not to show a modal
While
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:55 AM, yahvuu yah...@gmail.com wrote:
here are some diagrams depicting selected configurations for colormanagement:
http://yahvuu.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/dataflow.png
What happens in a multi-head setup when I maximize an image over (say)
a CRT and an LCD? Does
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:39 AM, yahvuu yah...@gmail.com wrote:
Christopher Curtis wrote:
What happens in a multi-head setup when I maximize an image over (say)
a CRT and an LCD? Does monitor profile take this into account?
Following the logic of the diagram, i'd say yes:
your case
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jon Cruz j...@joncruz.org wrote:
[...]
does seem to come down to the points that X11 does not and should not deal
with color management in these regards and needs to leave it to the
individual apps. To get a fully usable system, X11 would require some major
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 09:18 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
The GtkToolPalette widget that hosts the buttons is able to nicely
distribute available space among the buttons, so I would like to remove
the resize
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 09, 2010 20:19:03 Sven Neumann wrote:
Since I haven't been at LGM, I have trouble to understand the motivation
for doing GIMP merchandising.
[...]
b) Something a little bit better as a token of
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 01:56 -0700, Charlie De wrote:
And my point is that wasn't such a good decision precisely because it took 4
years to get it fixed. [...] If my line of thought had been followed 4
years ago,
GEGL
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com wrote:
it is custom coefficients in HSY-space:
Here's a reference to the HSY color model, since it seems uncommon,
and because when searching for gimp hsy in Google the second result
is the email I _just_ sent (!!)
http
Hello,
Let me start by saying I haven't been following any development builds
of GIMP or GEGL, so I may have some false presumptions and I certainly
lack some information. That aside, I'd like to ask some broader
questions about color spaces.
Firstly, some background: the HSY color space
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you tried GIMP from git? It has been made possible to do
per-character formating in text layers there.
What format does it save the per-character formatting in? Would HTML
be an option?
Understanding even a subset
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Bill Skaggs weska...@gmail.com wrote:
It would be much better not to use the word toolin this way.
I agree terminology is going to be difficult. I get the impression
you are only thinking about color, but I'm not. Maybe it's clearer if
I use the terms Image
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
somewhere else is not a very intuitive place either. We've had a
longer discussion when these items were moved to File-Create and no one
came up with a better solution.
I find the 'Create' label non-obvious as well. It makes
Let me try to clarify one thing:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com wrote:
terms of the GPL. Calling GIMP plugins directly gets fuzzier. If
they are scripts, it can be done. If they are compiled code it is
unclear.
I should have said
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Graeme Gill grae...@argyllcms.com wrote:
What counts
is dependence.
I think all of your arguments are wrong, but on this point you may be
right. I didn't realize that the GIMP is GPLv3 now, which is a very
different license. GPLv3 is very fuzzy about linking.
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
To make it crash:
perl -e 'print 5x210' | ./a.out
I believe the unbounded '%s' is a legitimate bug, but is the '%i'
assertion true?
The example it gives doesn't crash when I run it. Instead scanf
returns
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Nelson A. de Oliveira
nao...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com
wrote:
To make it crash:
perl -e 'print 5x210
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira nao...@gmail.com wrote:
Here (also from your patch):
snprintf (fmt_str, sizeof (fmt_str), %%%lds %%%lds %%%lds %%%lds,
sizeof (colorstr_r) - 1, sizeof (colorstr_g) - 1,
sizeof (colorstr_b) - 1, sizeof (colorstr_a) - 1);
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 01:43 +0100, Bogdan Szczurek wrote:
The thing is, that we concluded that permamenet transition or even
occasional use of Gimp would be much more appealing for Ps-bred guys
(like me ;)) if one would
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Rob Antonishen
rob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
The world would be better if each application domain had a consistent
set of core accelerators. File-New, File-Save, Cut/Copy/Paste, etc.
are good for most all applications. For a graphics program, common
tools
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same
in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it
could no longer be E because that inserts text in gedit, so we'd end
up using
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
Yes, perhaps it might be nice if the key to get the eraser was the same
in inkscape and gimp and blender and gedit and krita and mypaint, but it
[...]
I overlooked Krita. Krita uses Backspace as a BG Color Fill and
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Liam R E Quin l...@holoweb.net wrote:
I'm actually Ok with this. But we have to agree what we mean by peer
applications - I'd say gimp and inkscape are, for example, and not gimp
and photoshop.
So your argument is that on the Software Spectrum GIMP is not a
Let me start off by saying that this conversion is exasperating, and
this will likely be my last message on the topic.
Firstly, let me define peer group: Any set of applications that
interpret data in a specific way and allows the user to view or
manipulate said interpretation in any specific
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:39 PM, gespert...@gmail.com
gespert...@gmail.com wrote:
And all this conversation is because you think CTRL+Backspace makes
more sense than CTRL+. (because you're used to that combination) and
you don't want to take 30 seconds of your time to personalize the
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/1/11, Christopher Curtis wrote:
interact on this list. One of which is the knee-jerk reaction
whenever an email comes across with the word Photoshop in it.
What you call knee-jerk reaction
How about:
This patch seems to have been completed last year; there are no
outstanding issues against it. What needs to be done in order for
this to be integrated?
Chris
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Charlie De charlieco...@yahoo.com wrote:
Why?? Rupert Weber finished this last September
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Nicolas Robidoux nicolas.robid...@gmail.com
wrote:
One way of viewing the issue is:
Do you want to cater to the programmers you want, or the programmers you
have?
(With the hope of turning the latter into the former.)
It's worse than that, even. This is a
2011/7/14 Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si:
On Thursday, July 14, 2011, 19:34:08, Andrew Brandt wrote:
-- Are third parties permitted, according to your EULA, to bundle your
product this way?
GIMP is licensed under the GNU General Public License, version 2. The
This may not be accurate.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Chris Mohler cr33...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/7/14 Christopher Curtis ccurt...@gmail.com:
This may not be accurate. Current GIMP releases are GPLv3:
Oops - guess I need to pay more attention while lurking ;) I thought
the GPLv3 switch was still in the works
54 matches
Mail list logo
