.
Little things like this menu change may push me over the edge and make me -
and many of my friends, which I have supported over the years when editing
images with the GIMP - dump it for good...
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
in
digital cameras...
The difference with a GEGL-enabled GIMP is that
you can then work in the higher color-depths that the RAW format offers.
Which only means that a GEGL enabled GIMP with appropriate input filters is
the only way forward in this respect.
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
with the 14
bit depth my camera provides per colour channel and never drops to a non
linear colour space before the final save to JPEG would be preferred and I
hope that a GEGL enabled GIMP will do so in the forseable future...
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
___
Gimp
On Wednesday 24 March 2010, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 3/24/10, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
This is ludicrous - how would anyone trying to use the keyboard learn the
different mnemonics available?
This is default behaviour on Windows.
Which is the first thing I disable on any Windows
On Wednesday 21 October 2009, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
Good to know; so let me refine: is there ANYTHING in the move to
single window which would not be achieved by
a) restricting the maximal size of image window to the gap between
two toolboxes; and
b) making z-order changes
On Sunday 20 September 2009, peter sikking wrote:
so for everybody who feels this: why do you need windows-in-window or
work-side-by-side?
First of all a great idea to get some more feedback.
I have one thing for which I had wished for side by side windows recently:
When working on the layer
On Monday 07 September 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 09/07/2009 07:07 PM, Shashwat wrote:
Whatever you guys do. Please make it work with KDE kwin windows manager.
The
current UI doesn't work with Kwin or Compiz.
You'll have to file a bug report with those window managers, there's
On Saturday 05 September 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
A single-window mode would also turn 2.8 into a remarkable release,
with both layer-groups and a single-window mode, none of which were
originally planned for 2.8.
Why not have it both ways - by simply making the toolboxes dockable...
On Monday 16 June 2008, peter sikking wrote:
Simply said: a toolbar like this does not fit the UI of GIMP.
What a lame excuse to exclude a time saver and great help to occasional users
of the GIMP... Not everyone wants to cram his brain full of key shortcuts!
Why not have the toolbar placeable
On Monday 16 June 2008, you wrote:
My hi-end definition boild down to streamlined UI for professionals.
Much of the streamlined UI for the professionals can be had if the toolbar -
as proposed - would be configurable in both position (there is no reason why
it should not be vertically alignable
On Monday 16 June 2008, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
There is never enogth space if it comes to the work with big photos. And as
photos are usully in 4:3 and a lot of modern monitors are 16:10 the
vertical space
is more important.
You assume too much. In fact the majority of photos that professionals
On Friday 09 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
No, that's wrong. And that's one of the reasons why I want to remove
this confusing question. The EXIF standard defines precisely the list of
tags that must be updated and the list of tags that must be copied
unchanged. Unfortunately, older
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
The problem is that the question is not interpreted correctly by most
users, as can be seen by the other replies mentioning camera sensors that
sometimes report the wrong orientation. It does NOT mean: allow me to
decide if each image should
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 23:55 +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
* jpeg plug-in
+ remove the prompt for EXIF orientation: it should always be done
IMO the current solution of asking and allowing the user to skip this
question is preferred. It
to always are struggling with!
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Hello,
maybe now is the time to get around to finally getting all the filter settings
saved when exiting the gimp?
Every single time I edit pictures I am annoyed that filters like unsharp mask,
selective gaussian blur, decor border or almost any other one of them is
loosing the settings I made
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Should it be more easy than writing e.g. a plug-in in Python?
How about having a C++ virutal interface which you only have to fill in with
your own methods and GUI elements in a set dialog interface...
I have several things that I really
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 07:43, Sven Neumann wrote:
349340 Alt behaves incorrectly for new rectangle/ellipse selecti...
Should probably be looked at. We should get the interaction right
for the 2.4 release and not change it later unless absolutely needed.
I just stumbled across a similar
back to the old tool there, which simply allowed any multiple of the
height/width values set when aspect was fixed or provide two spinbuttons for
the aspect to be entered properly without having the user calculate
the aspect each an every time.
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:00, Sven Neumann wrote:
Fixing this is as simple as adding the GIMP_CONFIG_PARAM_SERIALIZE flag
to the registration of the interface properties. This is a simple change
and it is already outlined in the bug report. Please stick to the facts,
or if you don't know
On Friday 28 July 2006 11:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Karl Günter Wünsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's why I would like to update the cursor position after all of
the calculations are through to reflect the results.
Are you saying that you wish the pointer to be forced
I just stumbled across the next level in annoyance, resizing does only work
when grabbing one of the horizontal delimiter lines, using the vertical
delimiters seems to be blocked by some aspect ratio calcuations - Bug
#348807.
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 19:21, Michael Natterer wrote:
Instead of repeatedly ranting i want the old tool back you should
realize that you are using something that is explicitely labeled
unstable and in development. So be constructive, thus helping
fixing these bugs, or use the stable 2.2
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 19:52, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
The whole 2.3 branch is unstable and in development...
I know, but wasn't the 2.3 branch to be a short lived one, leading quickly to
a stable 2.4?
And this is why you did file the bug reports. One
rectangle selection tool and have the new one reworked so that the next
milestone doesn't have to be postponed because of this (for me the first one
is a true blocker, the other ones are very annoying to say the least).
regards
Karl Günter Wünsch
___
Gimp
25 matches
Mail list logo
