LOL.
- Original Message -
From: "Lourens Veen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2000 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: How much longer do I have to put up with this shit? (This is
NOT atroll)
Hmm, never thought about gimp as a marital aid. Don't really feel
Hi there,
i have problems to compile gimp-1.1.30.
First some error occurs while configuring the make script:
---
...
creating devel-docs/pdb/Makefile
sed: can't read ./devel-docs/pdb/Makefile.in: No such file or directory
...
Checking if your kit is complete...
Warning: the following files are
Additional info: I got the same error in configure, however make worked
fine on my system (glib 1.2.8 and gtk 1.2.8) and I'm running 1.1.30
without any problems now.
Lourens
Frank Werner wrote:
Hi there,
i have problems to compile gimp-1.1.30.
First some error occurs while configuring
On Sun, 10 Dec 100, Miles O'Neal wrote:
* I cannot use 90% of GIMP's features from keyboard. Hardly any of the
menus have keyboard shortcuts.
You can add all the menu shortcuts you want. They're completely
customizable. Given the number and potential mixes of plugins, this
is a
On 11 Dec 2000, Michael Natterer wrote:
Hi,
Ask politely next time.
Excuse me sir for not being so polite. You should read my previous email
where you will find most of the same issues repeated without using foul
language that you are so afraid of seeing. However, if at all possible,
may I
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 21:34:12 +0900 (JST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can ignore "bad language" in the first one, because you can still
perfectly understand the issues raised there. If you think they are
issues in the first place. Apparently, some people don't.
You could have
- one or more mouse clicks to make sure the current
mouse pointer is safe, i.e. it is not the left over fill bucket
pointer that I have just used a few seconds ago; if it is I need a
few more mouse clicks to find the main toolbox, then
click on some safe pointer such as box selection.
I
I bet that gave you a warm and fuzzy feeling to write a response like
that. If instead you (or others) focused on the issues rather than "bad
language" things would have been a lot better.
This is almost same as flaming a very reasonable email because of "bad
spelling". Instead, you should have
I am rather shocked. For someone who doesn't really know me, that's some
pretty bold statements. But then again, I've come to expect that from
you, dear Sven, so I don't really take it too seriously. You are still
upset from when I called you an asshole about a year ago. :)
I'm pretty sure
Most of the toolbox actions fortunately DO have
shortcut keys. That's one useful feature that I use all the time. On the
downside though, I am not sure if those are documented anywhere. I
haven't
seen the gimp-cheat-sheet postscript recently, since it hasn't been
updated
from back in '98,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11 Dec 2000, Michael Natterer wrote:
Hi,
Ask politely next time.
Excuse me sir for not being so polite. You should read my previous email
where you will find most of the same issues repeated without using foul
language that you are so afraid of seeing.
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
On the side note, one thing that could use serious serious improvement is
the preferences dialog. I think, the "Tree" structure of organizing
preferences is truly confusing.
The tree structure is nice and transparent. Tree structure is
On 11 Dec 2000, Michael Natterer wrote:
(Apologies if this reply is incorrectly addressed -- I still haven't
quite figured out how to properly reply to list mails)
[...]
Many of your points already _are_ on bugs.gnome.org's wishlist. Especially
the "Enter == OK", "Esc == Cancel" stuff is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am rather shocked. For someone who doesn't really know me, that's some
pretty bold statements. But then again, I've come to expect that from
you, dear Sven, so I don't really take it too seriously. You are still
upset from when I called you an asshole about a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
|So, my friends, don't get your panties in a bunch because a perfectly
|valid email includes the word "shit" in it's title. The only reason I got
|this kind of response is either because a) you know about all of these
|problems and furious that you can't fix them due
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 10:37:11PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the side note, one thing that could use serious serious improvement is
the preferences dialog. I think, the "Tree" structure of organizing
preferences is truly confusing. Reserve tree structures for directory
lists and
On Mon, 11 Dec 100, Miles O'Neal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
|There is a difference between assigning a
|shortcut key to activate a menu item when the menu is not open, and a
|key to operate the menu by using the keyboard. I know the former is
|easily customizable by pressing the
Emil Brink [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11 Dec 2000, Michael Natterer wrote:
(Apologies if this reply is incorrectly addressed -- I still haven't
quite figured out how to properly reply to list mails)
[...]
Many of your points already _are_ on bugs.gnome.org's wishlist. Especially
david rohde wrote:
I am currently writing a new plugin, which I hope if there is intrest in it
could be included in to standard gimp distributions. I understand that the
gimp is frozen at the moment, but if anyone could tell me the process
required for a new plugin to be considered for the
Hi,
david rohde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am currently writing a new plugin, which I hope if there is intrest in it
could be included in to standard gimp distributions. I understand that the
gimp is frozen at the moment, but if anyone could tell me the process
required for a new plugin
Hi,
Frank Werner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i have problems to compile gimp-1.1.30.
I have installed glib-1.3.2 and gtk+-1.3.2.
Can someone tell me, how can I solve this problem?
The INSTALL file clearly states that gimp-1.1.x will not compile with
the developers versions of glib and gtk+.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet that gave you a warm and fuzzy feeling to write a response like
that. If instead you (or others) focused on the issues rather than "bad
language" things would have been a lot better.
If you hadn't put them under a pile of fucks and shits then maybe I
would
On Monday, 11 Dec 2000, Paul E.C. Melis wrote:
Hi, I wrote about the "initial_sub_region:: error :: src-w * (src-bytes +
1) 521" bug/message to this list some time ago, and now it appears
somebody has submitted a bug report to the bug list about it (which I should
have done myself in the
23 matches
Mail list logo
