Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Speaking of old stuff to be ported to 1.2.. If I remember correctly, the 0.54
version (yes, kids. It did exist and it ruled.) had antialiased Threshold
tool.
Hmm - i just compiled gimp 0.54 and did not manage to find *any* threshold
function. Can
Martin Weber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Now that we have the new gimp 1.2.0 out, we should think about adding
new plugins to the gimp. Here my proposal:
Basically the number of plugins distributed with the gimp will most probably
shrink. We are thinking about a new scheme of distributing
Matthew Class ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
With regards to the ulimit problem described on this list earlier, I
ran lsof on a running gimp, and there are 155 open files...looks like
all the palettes. This can't be good...
This has been fixed in CVS.
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If he *has* a recent version, then there is a bug (failure to telescope error
messages), which a bug report would have indicated immediately.
He has not, there are three tools missing in the toolbox.
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
2000-11-29 Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* app/curves.c: Applied patch from David Hodson
[...]
image, but didn't correctly do this. Now it has the
(more useful) behaviour of doing a partial reset, where the
curve remains the same
Richard Stallman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Gimp developers, I asked Olivier to report this because it is a
serious (though superficial) problem. Since the Gimp only runs under
a window system, it should be able to handle both Backspace and Delete
in the same way (as delete-backwards), since
Olivier Lecarme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For programs designed after the PC has begun to be the dominant
computer, most implementors have taken as granted that a Backspace key
is meant to erase on left, and a Delete key is meant to erase on right.
This was the simplest solution for them,
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Maneesh Yadav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No one knows how to get the offsets for a layer from libgimp do they?
Yes, we know. Since a layer is only a special kind of drawable, the
following call will perfectly do:
gboolean gimp_drawable_offsets
Martin Edlman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Simon Budig wrote:
Hmm - it is definitely too late to change the Api to rename this
function to "gimp_layer_offsets". But is there a special reason why this
One way to make it sensefull and put gimp_layer_offsets to the API is
Hi.
To revive the gimp-perl support for my gimp installation I did a fresh
checkout of the gimp. Gimp-perl compiled and - after doing a separate
make install as root in plug-ins/perl it worked.
(BTW: Why is gimpdoc installed in /usr and not in my PREFIX?)
However, in the desire to keep up to
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 04:54:39PM +0100, Simon Budig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
checkout of the gimp. Gimp-perl compiled and - after doing a separate
make install as root in plug-ins/perl it worked.
(BTW: Why is gimpdoc installed in /usr
Simon Budig ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
IIRC it was like this:
(17. Nov.)
cvs co gimp
./autogen --prefix=/unstable
make
make install
I forgot something here: I did this make install as user simon (/unstable
is mine) and perl of course did not install. I then did an additional
make install
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Simon Budig wrote:
I wrote a small program to monitor the extended XInput-Events, it is
attached.
I've not had much time to investigate further on , but these are some trial
runs I get Built and run on ALICE, an SGI Indigo R4000, using MIPS 6.2
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was delighted this weekend to uncover a cause to #10498: "Marching
Ants die untimely deaths" which has been pestering me for sometime
now.
Whoo ho!
I would like to obtain a sense of how widespread this phenomenon
is. Marc Lehmann reported to
So. Finally I could do some test with my Intuos A5 and my Artpad II.
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
4. With pen still in hand, move to the interior of the selection region.
5. Press down and move the pen (this activates init_edit_selection()
and Edit Select tool methods that
Daniel Egger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 28 Oct, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
No clue. Is this a "they want someone to do a demo" or "who the heck
is going to do a gimp demo there??"
BTW: I'm going to show GIMP at the COMDEX in Las Vegas at the SuSE
booth
While we are at it: At the
Uwe Koloska ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
With this (and possibly later versions) it is possble to save an RGB image
to xpm format. I don't know the xpm format, but the xpm code from kde 1.1
isn't possible to load such an not-indexed xpm image.
So two questions:
o is it legal to save an xpm
Arnaud Masson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have ported a big part of gtk+ to MacOS 9, it's on mac-gtk at
SourceForge.
IT'S ALIVE ! ;-)
The GDK port is based on QuickDraw+WindowMgr, and Justin Armstrong has made
changes for carbon support.
Of course, on MacOS X, he uses a standard unix glib
Robert L Krawitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[gimptool not in Red Hat Gimp RPM]
Any suggestions? Is Red Hat broken, or is it our configure script?
IIRC gimptool is in the gimp-devel package, which makes sense, because
all uses (except determining the Gimp Version) are developer-related.
Bye,
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 11:49:26AM +0200, Simon Budig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC gimptool is in the gimp-devel package, which makes sense, because
all uses (except determining the Gimp Version) are developer-related.
So, adding scripts you
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 02:26:49PM +0200, Simon Budig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Argh - OK. I forgot the Script-fu scripts. But adding plugins is
impossible w/o gimp-devel, because the libgimp header files are
unavailable.
I don't think so: You
, currently I'm nearly cut off from my EMail-Communication.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Bye,
Simon Budig
--
--
currently not reachable via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net
Soeren Staun-Pedersen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Nordström wrote:
Hello there !
We are two students writing our master thesis about Open Source
Software. If you have any experience in developing Open Source Software,
Would it be okay to reply to
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You can save a selection to a channel (Select-Save to Channel) and
then modify this channel with any paint tools. Use the "Channels" tab
in the "Layers, Channels and Paths" dialog to toggle the visibility of
this new channel and to perform various
Hi all.
In about two months the biggest Linux Fair in Europe will take place.
The Linuxtag will happen in Stuttgart, Germany from 29.6.-2.7.2000.
Further information can be found at www.linuxtag.de.
The reason why I write this to this list is simple: I'm searching for
people, who are willing to
Karl Heinz Kremer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Please note that adding "tags" to the messages will mean that GIMP
isn't usable any more without catalogs which is not very sensible
IMHO. I'd rather refine the messages to have more variance in the
texts...
Raphael Quinet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So my question is: could someone explain what these parameters mean
and how to save a .gih brush in the correct format? Specifically, I
have a set of layers that were originally grabbed from a .GIF
animation and I would like to save them as a pixmap
Hi all.
I see, that Gimp can be crashed very easily when trying to use multiple
tools at the same image/layer. Michael adressed this: from the changelog:
2000-03-25 Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* app/cursorutil.[ch]: new global variable "gimp_busy" which gets
set/unset
Austin Donnelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Monday, 27 Mar 2000, Simon Budig wrote:
Is there any chance to do this on an "per image" base without
hazzeling too much?
I proposed to add per-image locking a while ago, but apparently this
wasn't too well liked. I'm can't re
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there any chance to do this on an "per image" base without
hazzeling too much?
It's not only parallel operations on an image. Gimp doesn't like you to
change the tool while it is active. So you can't rotate an image (using
the transform tools;
Hi all.
Most brushes are quite useless with the pencil, since it treats even an
opacity of 1 as fully opaque. I just fiddled around a little bit in
paint core and tried the following:
simon@cantaloop:/unstable/src/gimp/app cvs -z3 diff -u ./paint_core.c
Index: paint_core.c
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
snipped...
BTW: Does somebody use XFree 4.0 with a wacom tablet? Sometimes I
believe, that firm pressing the pen results in no more motion events...
Is it "no more motion events", or is it *so many* mot
Hi.
First congratulations for the new User-Installation Dialogs.
But I cannot resist to comment on it :-)
* There seems to be a problem with the big titles. As you can see
at http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/gimp/GimpUserInstallation.png
the title of an page gets cut off (Gimp CVS from
Can somebody change the redirection from bugs.gimp.org?
http://www.wilberworks.com/bugs.cgi is nonfunctional and
depreciated. The target url should be
http://bugs.gnome.org/db/pa/lgimp.html
Thanks,
Simon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/
SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
* There seems to be a problem with the big titles. As you can see
at http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/gimp/GimpUserInstallation.png
the title of an page gets cut off (Gimp CVS from
Sat Mar 25 02:01:18 CET 2000 ).
Are you using XFree86
Hi all.
Xach missed the CCC-Notes, here they are again ;-)
Bye,
Simon
- Forwarded message from Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Olof S Kylander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Simon Budig [EMAIL
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 04:16:04PM +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is a better way.
This might work for python, but it will not work for perl. It will find
the first perl in your path (which is often perl4), not the perl gimp
Raphael Quinet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Are there really multiple different executables named "perl" (not "perl4" or
so!) in your path? So when you work in your shell you always execute
version 4 of perl, when you invoke "perl"?
I suppose that Marc meant that the person running a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
-- Problem description:
Path to PERL do not have to be:
#!/usr/bin/perl
it's somewhere else at my system...
-- How to repeat:
Try to compile with PERL installed somewhere else...
-- Other comments:
Should be set in ./configure correctly...
Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 10:55:04PM +0100, Jarda Benkovsky wrote:
IMHO the problem is that the new ones (from dodge/burn on) are
somewhat inconsistent in drawing style - I would personally like
them to have more gray, so they are visible with dark
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I agree with marc here. Nobody expects Gimp 1.0 / 1.2 compatibility.
If we change this right after the 1.2 release we would force people
who want to use new plugins to a probably really unstable developers
version. IMHO this is bad.
Ok, so who is
Aaron Optimizer Digulla ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
(a Frequently Requested Feature): When I close a dialog and open it again
(e.g. a plugin), it should *not* reset its values to the defaults.
This is a per plugin issue. AFAIK most plugins do this already. Where
did you notice it?
Bye,
Nick Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[Reordering the Toolbox Menubar, because "Help" clobbers "Xtns" with
narrow Toolboxes]
What about renaming "Help" to "?" ? Maybe we can do this automagically
in narrow Toolboxes.
Is there a way to detect the clobbering?
Bye,
Simon
--
[EMAIL
Carl B. Constantine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there any way to "unflatten" or unmerge layers in the Gimp? Here's why. I
used a Script-Fu script to generate a 3D Text logo for my wife. It looks
very cool. However, the final image only has a single layer and the
background is all white.
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Daniel Egger wrote:
It works, it may not have all the features that Simon desired but it's
nice nevertheless...
Do you have any idea how much work is needed to integrate it with the
Paths dialog? A number of new bugs would certainly be introduced
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 1 Feb, Marc Lehmann wrote:
Your:
CategoryNew File
Looks IMHO much worse than the existing:
CategoryNew File Settings
Not really, you have the word "Preferences" just a few mm above it.
Also there was some inconsistency: The
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken.
Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now?
"us" should mean "the script-fu
Garry R. Osgood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If there were one feature of Simon's path tool that I would like to have
automagically appear in the Integrated path selection tool, it is the ability
to manipulate the curve by "pulling" on it directly. it is a very pleasant
way to adjust curves.
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
How about some comments for feature triage? There are some features in
Gimp 1.1.x which are buggy or unusable, yet stay the same for weeks
at a time. Without paid staff to do this work, we must throw away [*]
stuff that's not going to make it. On my
Paul Melis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I suggest the following generalisation:
a thingy (for lack of a good name) which:
- activates a certain tool on the toolbox
and has its own settings for that tool
- picks a certain color/pattern/gradient
- picks a certain
Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 11:50:53AM -0700, Michael J. Hammel wrote:
I suspect a similar change would need to be made to the Layer menu, ie "Set
Layer Size" instead of "Layer Resize". Just for consistancy sake.
Resize Layer and Resize Canvas
Sven Neumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Magnify:
Shift zoom out
--- Ctrl zoom in
Isn't it just always Zoom In (I mean unless Shift is pressed of course)?
Just an idea: middle mouse-button is panning, why not Shift-middle
button = Zoom Out and ctrl
Tuomas Kuosmanen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We also have Space if we need something. On Photoshop it is used for
panning, but Gimp has mouse2 for that. Could Space be a toggle after all for
the togglable tools? I know we had a talk about this a while back, and we
agreed that Shift is a
Hi all.
I have defined two active Areas on my tablet, one generates core-events,
one not. See the part in the XF86Config.
SubSection "WacomStylus"
Port"/dev/ttyS0"
DeviceName "Stylus Pen 2"
ModeAbsolute
Suppress10
Hi.
As you may have read at the Gimp News I am coordinating the
Gimp Booth at the Systems 1999 in Munich.
I need some people, who will be there and have some time left to
present the Gimp. So if you are interested, please mail me ASAP,
so I can get a ticket for you.
Further information:
55 matches
Mail list logo
