On 30 Jul, Marc Lehmann wrote:
i would really appreciate if you would finally start thinking, as this
is not the first time you claim things that are sooo obviously broken
:(
No need to get insulting. Spend your time fixing the plugin instead.
This would be more helpful for you and me. I
On 30 Jul, Marc Lehmann wrote:
It's you who is unprof(f)essional. You were and are totally wrong with
your today's claim about gcc -- claiming some not-yet-existant
version of gcc causes problems on your machine.
Pardon? Just because a version is not officially released doesn't mean
it
On 30 Jul, Marc Lehmann wrote:
No need to get insulting.
It's pure fact. You keep claiming all sorts of funny things that you
yourself should have known long before you started posting about it.
Ok Marc, it's enough. I will not continue this useless flamewar!
In real life you sometimes
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 04:54:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30 Jul, Marc Lehmann wrote:
i would really appreciate if you would finally start thinking, as this
is not the first time you claim things that are sooo obviously broken
:(
No need to get insulting.
It's pure fact.
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 06:02:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's pure fact. You keep claiming all sorts of funny things that you
yourself should have known long before you started posting about it.
Ok Marc, it's enough. I will not continue this useless flamewar!
In real life you
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 12:09:25AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The most frequent bug I'm stumbling over is the uncompilability with
gcc compilers more rencent than version 2.95.2.
then you must come from the future. more recent gcc versions than 2.95.2
DO NOT EXIST. it would save us
On 30 Jul, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Pardon? Just because a version is not officially released doesn't
mean it doesn't exist, does it?
For this purpose, I would say it does (mean that it does not exist).
Especially since it isn't even a formal snapshot (which egcs was doing
for a
Hi all,
I currently have the latest developers' version of GIMP
(v1.1.24). Can someone tell me if Perl scripting is still available ? (...there
used to be any entry called "Perl-FU" on the Xtns menu).
I'd like to run a Perl script called perlotine that was
written by Seth Bur
On 30 Jul, Andrew J Fortune wrote:
I currently have the latest developers' version of GIMP (v1.1.24). Can
someone tell me if Perl scripting is still available ? (...there used
to be any entry called "Perl-FU" on the Xtns menu).
Perl normally should be there. But since the Perl
Hi,
Perl normally should be there. But since the Perl plugin has never
really worked (greetings Marc! :) it's not a big phenomenon that
it doesn't work for you...
Sorry Daniel, but don't we don't need that kind of FUD here. If gimp-perl
is still not working for you, please let us know
Hi Daniel,
I didn't say that the Perl scripting tool didn't work for me. I said that I
couldn't find it on GIMP's menus.
regards,
Andrew
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2000 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: Perl
11 matches
Mail list logo
