On Mon, 10 Jan 2000 18:43:23 +, alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Maybe the earlier splash images were only distributed in GIF format,
but then they moved to PPM after Burn All GIFs? Just a guess.
The splash images have always been PPMs.
You can retrieve all of them (at least since 1.00) from
Adrian Likins wrote:
snipped...
the baloon, the rocket, or the new one are my faves for 1.2. I really
like the newest one. Nice work.
Adrian
The magical quality of 1.4 is hard to beat. It reminds me of Bilbo Baggins:
"The road goes ever onward..."
The latest is very good too,
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, "Garry R. Osgood" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest is very good too, but the bristles are pointing the wrong way
(they would point *into* the ink blot as the brush pushes to the left).
I guess this bothers my boring and literal mind.
Good catch! Actually, it is even
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Adrian Likins wrote:
the baloon, the rocket, or the new one are my faves for 1.2. I really
like the newest one. Nice work.
Adrian
I gotta say, the newest one is definitely my favorite so far. The baloon
was nice, but this one looks really polished, and
the baloon, the rocket, or the new one are my faves for 1.2. I really
like the newest one. Nice work.
Adrian
I gotta say, the newest one is definitely my favorite so far. The baloon
was nice, but this one looks really polished, and professional, but fun at
the same
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:45:50 -0800 (PST), Arcterex [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I personally like both the balloon and brush image. Maybe both can
fit in somewhere? I understand I'm just a lurker here and have no
real clout, but maybe one can be the splash (I'm thinking balloon)
and the brush one
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Carey Bunks wrote:
Glyph, I have to say that my sentiments are just the opposite of
yours. Although the latest splash (with the brush) is nice and
traditional looking, I find it has little identity and little
character. On the other hand I feel that the balloon splash
On Don, 13 Jan 2000 wrote the famous Carey Bunks:
Don't you think, though, that it would be good if the GIMP had an
identity? I think the marketing types call it something like
"branding"...an image that when folks see it they say, "oh yeah,
that's the GIMP". If the splash is always changing,
Thus spoke Carey Bunks
Don't you think, though, that it would be good if the GIMP had an
identity? I think the marketing types call it something like
"branding"...an image that when folks see it they say, "oh yeah,
that's the GIMP". If the splash is always changing, I think it will
just
Thus spoke Tom Rathborne
Right now I think Wilber only shows up in the "Tip of the day" box. I
think he should be on the splash screen, on the about page, and
perhaps even in the help files. If the help files will be based on
GUM, which I imagine is a very structured document, maybe we could
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 01:13:31AM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Carey is right with the branding! Photoshop is known by it's eye, corel
draw by it's balloon (so maybe the balloon isn't very well suited for the
gimp), Illustrator by the venus and so on.
Corel's balloon is just boring. It's got
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 01:15:54PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, "Garry R. Osgood" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latest is very good too, but the bristles are pointing the wrong way
(they would point *into* the ink blot as the brush pushes to the left).
I guess this
On Sunday, 9 Jan 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 05:08:26PM +0100, "Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that means quality loss (original where 256 colors only?), and I am looking
Yes, quality loss in many cases...
for the PPM, not
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:24:09PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
On Sunday, 9 Jan 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 05:08:26PM +0100, "Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that means quality loss (original where 256 colors only?), and I am
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 03:15:55PM -0800, Tuomas Kuosmanen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:24:09PM +, Austin Donnelly wrote:
On Sunday, 9 Jan 2000, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 05:08:26PM +0100, "Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
15 matches
Mail list logo
