Test

2001-01-11 Thread Jonathan Gift
No traffic, just testing up and running... Jonathan

Re: test program for waitpid/sigchld problems

2000-11-10 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes: Maybe we should all do our "mea culpa" and test a bit more seriously especially on non-Linux platforms, now that 1.2 is just around the corner. Nope, it's just me wit

test program for waitpid/sigchld problems

2000-11-08 Thread Raphael Quinet
Included below is a small test program that checks how the OS behaves when a child process exits while the parent is blocking on waitpid() and has a SIGCHLD handler installed (which also calls waitpid, and thus could steal the status if the signal handler is called before the first waitpid

Re: test program: FreeBSD, IRIX 6.5

2000-11-08 Thread Jarda Benkovsky
FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE: installing signal handler... forking... waiting for child 25282 to exit... child 25282 has exited sig_pid = 25282 sig_status = 25600 main_pid = -1 main_status = sigchld handler was called before waitpid (no status) IRIX 6.5 IP22: installing signal handler...

Re: test program for waitpid/sigchld problems

2000-11-08 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000, Ludovic Poitou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the results I got with your test program on Solaris 8, OSF1, HP-UX, AIX. [...] Results on Solaris 8: sigchld handler was called before waitpid (no status) [...] Results on OSF1- V4.0 True64 - alpha sigchld handler

AIX 4.3, IRIX 5.3, SunOS 4.1.1 (Re: test program for waitpid/sigchld problems)

2000-11-08 Thread Tomas Ogren
On 08 November, 2000 - Raphael Quinet sent me these 2.2K bytes: If you are running another UNIX-like system (*BSD, HP-UX, AIX, etc.), it would be nice if you could compile and run the following code and report what it says. The code does not depend on glib, gtk or any other libraries, so it

Re: test program for waitpid/sigchld problems

2000-11-08 Thread Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raphael Quinet) writes: On Wed, 08 Nov 2000, Ludovic Poitou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the results I got with your test program on Solaris 8, OSF1, HP-UX, AIX. [...] Results on Solaris 8: sigchld handler was called before waitpid (no status) [...] Results

Re: Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

2000-06-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote: Testing autoconf... expr: syntax error too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14 [ ... ] Most likely, you have 2.14a or something like that. I sent a patch to Sven a few days ago that should fix this -- you may want to do a CVS update to see if

Re: Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

2000-06-25 Thread David Odin
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 03:30:55PM +0200, David Odin wrote: On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote: Testing autoconf... expr: syntax error too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14 [ ... ] Most

test (ignore)

2000-01-16 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
swallow this, procmail! -- .---( t i g e r t @ g i m p . o r g )---. | some stuff at http://tigert.gimp.org/ | `---'