Sven Neumann wrote:
What a perfect mess!! Suggestions on how to make this useful and
consistent are welcome...
Opinion: I feel it would be reasonable to create unified set of modifier keys...
Shift is always a positive thing (add, copy...) , Ctrl is always the
opposite (remove, cut...) and
Hi,
The idea of a help system as part of GIMP sounded interesting and I had
hoped to try it out and comment on it but I now discover I won't be able
to do so.
There are many things you can do about this:
- Install the gnome-libs package. This will not change your desktop into
a gnome
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 03:50:56AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 09:31:05PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if _every_ text widget - static labels in particular - was
clickable and allowed the user to modify the translation and submit it
to a central server?
On Wednesday, 10 Nov 1999, Sven Neumann wrote:
- Grab GtkXmHtml seperately. This is difficult at the moment, but I was
told that the gEdit application offers a seperately bundled one.
If gEdit needs GtkXmHtml, and so does Gimp, does this not mean there's
a real requirement to make
Maybe the time has come to fold GtkXmHtml into the main library.
Ugh... cough, cough. Have you looked at the GtkXmHTML (or however it
should be capitalized) source code? One would hope GTk+ has higher
standards. Not to mention that the "Gtk" part of the GtkXmHTML name is
quite misleading,
- Help us to make a seperate version of GtkXmHtml that compiles on a lot
of setups and fix the Gimp configure script.
Just so you know, GNOME is dropping GtkXmHTML because it is no longer
being maintained and is not very good in general. Anders is working
on a very nice GtkHTML widget,
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 11:10:14AM -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
- Help us to make a seperate version of GtkXmHtml that compiles on a lot
of setups and fix the Gimp configure script.
Just so you know, GNOME is dropping GtkXmHTML because it is no longer
being maintained and is
On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 03:40:39PM +, Lee Willis wrote:
Just a quick question. What is the copyright status on the icons used in
the Gimp. The reason that I'm asking is that we'd quite like to use the
"New Layer" icon from the gimp (Copy attached) on out company site as
part of a link to
On 9 Nov, Sven Neumann wrote:
Daniel Eggert wrote:
BTW: My name spelled E g g e r without any 't'
Ok, here's my setup:
glib: uptodate from CVS (1.2 branch)
gtk+: uptodate from CVS (1.2 branch)
gimp: uptodate from CVS
glibc: libc-2.0.7
Well, my version is glibc is a bit
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:59:58AM +1000, David Bonnell wrote:
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Ewald R. de Wit wrote:
Anyway, today I went over the Gimp sources and noticed how complicated
the tile architecture makes things and I couldn't help wondering why
the heck it was put in. All it seems to do
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 12:26:58PM +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the Gnome-Libs, because some people refuse to install gnome
(I dont know why, but there are those people...)
Here is a good reason: gnome is large. TOO LARGE. And if you do not want
to use the gui it is a big
Austin wrote on Tuesday, 09 Nov 1999:
Again, I'd recommend someone finding out what PhotoShop's modifiers
do, and just blatantly copy them. I have two reasons for this:
a) people used to PS will like this.
b) some team at Adobe has already done usability testing -
we can reuse their
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 06:18:54PM +0800, Ian McKellar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it isn't a central server but a local .rc file (that could be sent in by
translators) then I would think this sounds very cool.
Local .rc file which can be uploaded to the central server through a dialog
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 01:11:54AM +0100, Olof S Kylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* All Script in Xtns should be under ZZ-Fu
(ZZZ == Lang)
I strongly disagree. From a usability perspective this is nonsense. It might
be nice for a user to know whom to blame for the script
Nich Lamb wrote on Die, 09 Nov 1999:
Why does my 7274 x 9985 RGB image (212743Kb of data by my calculations)
result in the creation of a gimpswap which is up to 500Mb in size?
Where do you think can the undo information reside???
Uwe
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Further to my original observations, here is something more detailed:
Gimp is set to ~24M tile cache, on a 64Mb machine with ~64Mb of swap
The TIFF is enormous (see previous post for exact dimensions) and as a
naive RGB array (3 bytes per pixel) would use ~210Mb of space
Stage ---
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 01:40:28AM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Nich Lamb wrote on Die, 09 Nov 1999:
Why does my 7274 x 9985 RGB image (212743Kb of data by my calculations)
result in the creation of a gimpswap which is up to 500Mb in size?
Where do you think can the undo information reside???
17 matches
Mail list logo
