Article on UI design in free software.

2000-01-24 Thread Adam D. Moss
Not bad. Quite pertinent to GIMP. http://sendmail.net/?feed=interviewkuniavsky Not that I think GIMP's UI is bad (lately) or that we have a particular reason to actively innovate as opposed to more of less cribbing, ahem, someone's UI. --Adam

Re: End-user feedback: Perl logulator innerbevel

2000-01-24 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken. Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now? "us" should mean "the script-fu maintainer", and not me nor you. Of course it

Re: [gimp-devel] Re: End-user feedback: Perl logulator innerbevel

2000-01-24 Thread Simon Budig
Marc Lehmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 01:52:40AM +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken. Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now? "us" should mean "the script-fu

Remove the Stack Trace...

2000-01-24 Thread Jens Lautenbacher
Hi Folks, I would like to kindly suggest that we at least give a configure option to avoid the stacktrace stuff that happens when gimp crashes. I'm currently developping a distributed perlfu server and it would make life much much easier if gimp would simply crash without hanging still around

Re: Saving a layer

2000-01-24 Thread Sven Neumann
As part of my sawmill theme tool gimpmill, I need to save individual layers to disk. The way I currently do it involves creating an image of the same dimensions, doing a gimp_edit_copy and then a gimp_edit_paste. This is fine provided the layer's content spans the full width and height of the

Re: End-user feedback: Perl logulator innerbevel

2000-01-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Marc, don't take this too personally, it is not and was never meant to be! I won't unless someone tells us what he thinks is broken. Well, telling "us" about it didn't help in the past, so why should it now? "us" should mean "the script-fu maintainer", and not me nor you. Well, since

Re: Remove the Stack Trace...

2000-01-24 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi jtl, I would like to kindly suggest that we at least give a configure option to avoid the stacktrace stuff that happens when gimp crashes. I also remember having big problems with a segfaultet gimp started from the gnome panel (or any other non-shell commandline means) and gimp

Speaking of additional plug-ins

2000-01-24 Thread Michael Taylor
I have a couple of image format plug-ins available for the GIMP one is included with the GIMP (pix) and one of them (formerly tdi, now MayaIFF) has been in the unstable tree since before 1.0 was released. The latest version, as always, is in the plug-in registry. It's not likely that many

Re: Remove the Stack Trace...

2000-01-24 Thread Manish Singh
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 06:31:24PM +0100, Raphael Quinet wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 24 Jan 2000, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote: Since the only advantage of this is the stack-trace for non-developers, why don't we just have it dump stack, then

Re: Remove the Stack Trace...

2000-01-24 Thread Daniel . Egger
On 24 Jan, Raphael Quinet wrote: Any suggestions for the name of the new option? It could be something like "--disable-stack-trace" or "--disable-crash-query", assuming that the default behaviour would be to have it enabled in unstable releases. Note that I also support the idea posted

Re: Saving a layer

2000-01-24 Thread Ian McKellar
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 08:55:17PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote: As part of my sawmill theme tool gimpmill, I need to save individual layers to disk. The way I currently do it involves creating an image of the same dimensions, doing a gimp_edit_copy and then a gimp_edit_paste. This is fine