El 23/10/13 20:57, Robert Krawitz escribió:
The problem -- and this is more so with GIMP than with many apps -- is
that it really comes down to what you want to do and your level of
patience. If you're using it on web images (maybe 1 MP or less), you're
not doing anything fancy, and you're
El 04/10/13 05:12, Jehan Pagès escribió:
It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
2.8.6 for Windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708110
In my oppinion, that's not a bug, it's an improvement.:-)
Bold and Italics variants should be designed
El 04/10/13 14:57, Matthew Smith escribió:
Hello
I am going to make an effort to get a layer multi-select going. In this
email I will outline what I hope to achieve and I am asking what would
be the most effective way to go about submitting a patch that could get
accepted.
IANAD ;) but
El 27/09/13 19:01, Pat David escribió:
All,
I had an interesting discussion today in IRC I'm summarizing here in order
to clarify some sticky points.
I had recently pushed a new tutorial that included an image I took of a
friend. Michael had concerns about the use of this image and the
El 09/09/13 14:06, Michael Schumacher escribió:
On 09.09.2013 18:41, Mahavisnujana Ochoa wrote:
[a wall of urls]
This is a good way to get into many spam filters. I'd suggest to
- put those onto some image posting, like e.g. flickr, deviantart
- paste a link to the collection, instead of all
El 01/09/13 17:22, kcle...@users.sourceforge.net escribió:
Okay. so do you mean that any non-GEGL plugins or filters should
be treated as not 32-bit compatible and is therefore capable of
silently clipping data?
What Alexandre is saying is that you won't have to worry about it when
2.10
I bumped with news about a new open source library for opening and
writing PSD files.
http://layervault.tumblr.com/post/56891876898/psd-rb?utm_content=buffer76c92utm_source=bufferutm_medium=twitterutm_campaign=Buffer
It's a Ruby library, which probably makes it not directly useful for
GIMP,
El 20/07/13 13:59, Jason Simanek escribió:
You shouldn't have to press load defaults. Defaults should be used
automatically each time you export.
Since I am opening several different images, altering them and then
exporting, I have to click Load Defaults for each one. The settings
that
El 18/07/13 00:27, Jason Simanek escribió:
Hi,
Is there any way to set default JPG/PNG/whatever export settings? I am
manipulating a lot of images right now and every JPG export involves
changing the Quality, the Smoothing and the DCT method. Over and over
and over. This happens with Export as
El 18/07/13 10:28, Jason Simanek escribió:
Hi,
On 07/18/2013 01:05 AM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) wrote: Just save a
new default with the settings you want and it will be used
next time you export.
Well, now I feel dumb. Thanks Gez!
This certainly fulfills my need, but I find it odd
El 12/07/13 18:39, Sylae Corell escribió:
Hello everyone,
So, I regularly use the Create from Clipboard feature to make quick
edits, especially from images grabbed off the web. However, I'm often an
imbecile and accidentally click copy image location instead of copy
image in my browser. Would
El 30/05/13 10:52, Pat David escribió:
Hi guys,
Not sure about the best place for this, so figured I would talk to this
list about it.
I recently became a part-time writer for PetaPixel.com (photography-centric
site). They do a fair amount of traffic with photographers, and as a
long-time
El 19/05/13 07:46, Michael Schumacher escribió:
On 19.05.2013 12:36, Mirella Istrate wrote:
Just a stupid question: WHY I cannot install GIMP in my
preferred language (English)??? I live in this moment in
Switzerland and it
is impossible to install other as German language!!!
You can
El 08/05/13 09:26, Elle Stone escribió:
This isn't a direct reply to your question, as you are asking whether
Gimp itself can or will handle raw processing and I'm not sure
when/whether the Gimp developers intend to go that direction. But
there are two alternative approaches already being used
El 11/03/13 11:20, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
In a nutshell, and that's my personal view, the gradient editing
should happen on canvas, much like in Inkscape (0.49 also places
numerical input for colors stops position on the tools settings
toolbar). And in GEGL-based GIMP a gradient fill
El 04/03/13 11:24, Joao S. O. Bueno escribió:
[snip]
So, we might as well start fleshing out what would be needed to get
lazy rendering done,
just to get it clearer for everyone, and maybe have one or more of the steps
needed for that as Summer of Code projects.
+1000!
While I was reading
El 04/03/13 11:24, Joao S. O. Bueno escribió:
possibly even clipped to 8bpp with dumb acelerated 8bpp GEGL operators
and no conversion needed
Here I don't agree. In my opinion 8bpc should be only available for file
I/O. I wouldn't mind even if it's removed from the precision menu :D
Gez
El 10/02/13 15:57, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Timo Witte wrote:
I used Color Balance a lot recently. And i want to propose a redesign
of the UI to make it more intuitive. I have made a quick mockup of that:
El 25/01/13 16:54, Daniel Hornung escribió:
On Friday, 25. January 2013 11:30:40 scl wrote:
I'd say, it depends on the images the particular user usually works
with. While a screen or web designer might work with small images the
most time, a photographer or scientist works with much bigger
Hi,
I find the default of 15 lines for the grid in transform tools quite
annoying most of the times. When you're transforming small things the
grid really gets in the way.
I think a more conservative setting, say 3 or 5 would be more a flexible
default.
What do you think?
Gez
El 18/12/12 14:28, Paka escribió:
* jEsuSdA 8)lis...@jesusda.com [12-18-12 11:39]:
Hi Gez!
Great opinion and nice data. As I suppose, maybe Photivo will be the chosed.
Darktable will be fine, but there are no Windows version at the moment.
Being crippled by windows is not the end. You
I'm adding an extra item to the list:
I also had several of reports about people choosing the file filter
dropdown (in the export dialog) by mistake, thinking it was the format
selector.
A label saying show only: or something like that could help.
Also the widget is too prominent and it
El 25/11/12 11:57, Richard Gitschlag escribió:
Now that is strange, because using Windows GIMP 2.8 it seems to be the
default setting for my Export dialog, even between sessions.
Yes, It's also the default setting in linux, but the problem is that
people seem to miss that using the extension
El 22/11/12 11:14, Caitlin escribió:
Hi there,
I was just wondering whether it would be okay for me to sell images
and any products (which materials created in GIMP have been
incorporated into) that I've made using GIMP? The images etc used
would originally be my own, however, there may also
El 14/11/12 09:32, yahvuu escribió:
Am 13.11.2012 18:37, schrieb Michael Natterer:
The problem is much bigger. Almost *all* of our layer modes
will be Legacy, and the new modes will operate in linear
light. Just adding a hack for overlay is not going to
fix the root problem.
are you referring
El 14/11/12 23:18, Ofnuts escribió:
Use legacy mode when the image is iprocessed in 8-bit? (which could be
on e of the technical reasons for the non-linear blending anyway)
That's interesting, and iirc it was one of the first proposals.
The problem with that, in my opinion, is how to
El 13/11/12 14:37, Michael Natterer escribió:
The problem is much bigger. Almost *all* of our layer modes
will be Legacy, and the new modes will operate in linear
light. Just adding a hack for overlay is not going to
fix the root problem.
--mitch
Apart from the different overlay formula and
El 23/10/12 06:16, SorinN escribió:
We already have a plugin which ca do something similar in GIMP (and is
standing as a gimp plugin for quite a while ..).
Now this plugin seems to be unmaintained.
please check here : http://refocus-it.sourceforge.net/
SoriN: Does Refocus work for motion blur
El 23/09/12 19:33, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez)
gespert...@gmail.com wrote:
I've used this one in 2.6 for print softproofing:
Gives better results than the print preview settings in GIMP and seems to be
more consistent with what I
El 19/09/12 10:43, Christopher Curtis escribió:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@mpc.com.br
mailto:gwid...@mpc.com.br wrote:
Why a new branch?
Things in other branches tend to bit-rot horribly. This is GIMP
unstable - it should go into master.
Wouldn't it
El 18/09/12 20:33, Joao S. O. Bueno escribió:
Why a new branch?
Things in other branches tend to bit-rot horribly. This is GIMP
unstable - it should go into master.
+1. Merge! :)
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
El 09/09/12 18:22, Jeremy Morton escribió:
Yes, processors nowadays are very powerful and indeed applying a bunch
of effects onto a shape layer every time you make a change takes a
good amount of CPU power; but that's fundamentally different, because
at least there, there is a finite limit of
El 08/09/12 16:23, Jeremy Morton escribió:
I think the first stage, to make it really useful, would be to
incorporate the Script-fu layer effects here into GIMP proper:
http://registry.gimp.org/node/186
Are they already in GIMP? I can't see most of them. Once they were
in, GIMP could apply
El 07/08/12 08:04, Øyvind Kolås escribió:
I'll try to explain the desired situation in the end differently:
Files coming into GIMP and going out of GIMP might have assigned ICC
profiles, this is for import and export. There is no such things as a
working space in GEGL buffers flowing between
On 25/07/12 07:44, wanderer wrote:
Well, as an user who read the list it came to my mind the
implementation of auto-save in Gimp. I guess you already had that
discussion, but I think that a good software is the one that
understand that us, mere mortals human beings, make a lot of mistakes
and
On 24/07/12 15:56, Simon Budig wrote:
Please try to state your question/suggestion in a way, that non-native
speaker have a chance of understanding. I did not get at all what you
want, and my english in general is pretty good. Thanks, Simon
He seems to suggest that GIMP developers should
On 23/07/12 14:15, Akira Tanaka wrote:
That is all. If you took the time to read this, you have my thanks.
You're welcome.
bye then.
G.
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
El 02/07/12 12:21, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Caitlin Muelacaitlinmu...@att.net wrote:
Gimp Developer(s),
My friend is having some problems with Gimp. When she opens it, the Tool
features that are usually located on the right (Layers, Paths, Undo, ect.)
are
El 24/06/12 08:23, Tobias Oelgarte escribió:
Am 24.06.2012 04:48, schrieb Liam R E Quin:
Save changes the name from Untitled the first time you use it. Save As
and Save a Copy are the same except that Save As changes what Save will
do next time you use it, i.e. changes the current filename.
El 21/06/12 20:22, Elle Stone escribió:
On 6/21/12, Tobias Oelgartetobias.oelga...@googlemail.com wrote:
I entirely agree with the observation that the export entry in the
menu is badly positioned. It really disappears between the icon heavy
save and print sections, which really seduces me to
El 20/06/12 12:34, Richard Gitschlag escribió:
The (as someone so pithily phrased it) Ha ha ha - No way am I letting
you do that manner in which GIMP informs you of the Save/Export
distinction can be anything from merely harmless to downright
offensive, depending on your individual workflow
El 20/06/12 12:58, peter sikking escribió:
Richard Gitschlag wrote:
So if I may throw an echo into the room and ask why the particular message box CAN NOT provide a
yes/no prompt, with Yes transferring control to the Export box and No
cancelling back to the Save dialog?
as I said before: no
I'm following the whole discussion and I'm more and more convinced that
a default keyboard shortcut for overwrite would solve this.
People is basically complaining because they lost a handy way to save
lossy formats back after simple editing.
Typical example: open a JPG file, adjust curves,
El 15/06/12 11:35, Nathan Summers escribió:
I still wonder how much the target audience overlaps with the actual
audience. :)
Let me put it this way: I still wonder how can we attract our target
audience if we do things for a different audience.
GIMP project has chosen a sane path: to define
El 14/06/12 21:19, Graeme Gill escribió:
Safe is a value judgement. The assumption being made is that preserving
every possible detail that gimp can create overrides every other consideration.
Many users will not agree that this is the case in every or even most
situations.
If they are opening
El 31/05/12 04:31, peter sikking escribió:
we can discuss again how Create was named (I was involved, so it ain't
half bad); it was to not to have New... and under it New (with a
submenu).
What about File New from... Submenu
Gez
___
I'm not totally against the idea of a project, but I wonder if it's
really necessary to create a project folder with assets considering that
XCF is intended to store all that stuff in a single file.
I'm fine if the idea is to create a sidecar folder with all the temp
stuff generated to speed up
Hi:
I just noticed that the function for saving defaults for the jpeg export
plugin isn't working in 2.8
Am I missing something or should I file a bug report?
btw, new jpeg defaults are much, much better than 2.6s but imo the
progressive option shouldn't be on. It makes the file size a tad
El 12/05/12 13:46, peter sikking escribió:
I have given it a first stab:
http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Interaction_design_patch
I like to discuss it here on this mailing list and get it
in a shape that is beyond reasonable doubt. after that the
next steps can be taken.
Makes sense to me.
El 11/05/12 20:21, Michael Natterer escribió:
Please file it in bugzilla, it's pointless to use threading if it
makes things slower, and we have no code to determine the #cpus on the
mac anyway, so we should default to one.
My 2.9 install on linux (Debian, 64 bit) also detected the number of
50 matches
Mail list logo
