Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-06-05 Thread peter sikking
I have now given the whole thing a big push: http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Interaction_design_patch not complete yet, but a start. --ps founder + principal interaction architect man + machine interface works http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture

Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-06-03 Thread peter sikking
let's pick up this discussion again, sorry for the delay. Saul Goode wrote: In my opinion the language of the draft is not very inviting to contribution. the draft is a _description_ of the current code process, not a manual/invitation page for new contributors. it describes how things are in

[Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-18 Thread Crazy Aunt Gail's, LLC
In my opinion the language of the draft is not inviting to contribution. At minimum, each of the has tos should be changed to either shoulds or should strive tos. Also, it is unclear whether the final does not have to be perfect trumps any or all of the previous seven bullet points -- if it

Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-13 Thread gfxuser
Hi Alexandre, On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 10:40 AM, gfxusergfx.u...@online.de wrote: Another dawn of hope is the GEGL porting matrix. AFAIK most of GIMP is ported to GEGL, but there are still some open 'easy to do' tasks - the best start for beginners. The matrix starts with the chapter 'How to

Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-13 Thread gfxuser
On 12.05.12 at 5:45 pm Michael Muré wrote: I completed the How to port section in the wiki. Great! Now it should be even easier. Best regards, grafxuser ___ gimp-developer-list mailing list gimp-developer-list@gnome.org

Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-13 Thread Burnie West
On 05/13/2012 06:15 AM, peter sikking wrote: yes, already thinking how the new process will integrate with bugzilla is useful. however I want to avoid that things needing UI design become a blocking state in bugzilla. And if it's really a blocking issue it should show up where?

Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-13 Thread Michael Muré
I really have no special opinion on that. I am, however, concerned about People can propose patch for the spec without need to have an account. -- that smells like a welcome sign to spammers. And that's, as far as I can tell, the only reason we have user registration by request at

[Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-12 Thread peter sikking
guys, lately I have been thinking about introducing a new process. this thinking has been accelerated by the GIMP bof at the lgm, where GIMP project members expressed concern about lack of openness and transparency in the current UI redesign work, and I expressed concern about lack of valuation

Re: [Gimp-developer] contribution processes...

2012-05-12 Thread Guillermo Espertino (Gez)
El 12/05/12 13:46, peter sikking escribió: I have given it a first stab: http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Interaction_design_patch I like to discuss it here on this mailing list and get it in a shape that is beyond reasonable doubt. after that the next steps can be taken. Makes sense to me.