Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:20:08 +0100
From: tobias.oelga...@googlemail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] suggestion for new versions of GIMP
Maybe the focus
for sliders should react the same way like the sliders in Blender
do? They don't steal the
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:52:39 +1030
From: 00a...@gmail.com
To: stecnico0...@hotmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Luminosity in LAB does not agree with Wikipedia
or Matlab
What
you have not quite said, Richard, is that this adjustment is the one
that
Cedric, the problem is that the only vibe your intiial post gave off is a this
is wrong and a this is totally wrong. You need to explain the problem in
detail (e.g. provide a contrived scenario to demonstrate it) and then suggest
(again, in detail) what the proper result should have be
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:27:47 -0600
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Edge-sensitive painting?
From: cr33...@gmail.com
To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Richard Gitschlag
strata_ran...@hotmail.com wrote:
Say for example that I
Just today while toying around with GIMP 2.8.0-RC1 I noticed that whenever you
have an indexed image open, its colormap appears at the top of GIMP's Palettes
list as a virtual palette.
This is awesome. I don't recall it being that way in 2.6, was it?
But there's one thing missing: The
From my perspective, what kind of filepicker dialog an application uses goes a
long way in making it look like a native app for its target platform.
Allowing the Windows version of GIMP to incorporate the native Win32
filepicker dialog would be a huge improvement at least in platform-specific
Going to split this because it really NEEDS some wider discussion. There's no
nice way of phrasing it - in the current GIMP this distinction is a total snafu.
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
From: grosberg.mich...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 06:45:22 +
Subject: Re:
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 00:18:56 +0300
From: d...@shadowdrama.net
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Feature request: Improve the Open file dialog
thumbnails
On 2012-05-18 23:45, Cristian Secară wrote:
The Windows Inkscape version uses Windows native file
From: oleca...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 15:09:18 +0200
To: gimp-werkst...@gmx.de
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Problems with brushes
4. The mapping matrix for the dynamic settings of the bushes is not
editable. How can I edit this map to use on
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 20:12:09 +0200
From: martin...@gmx.ch
To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Problems with brushes
hi Richard
The opacity problem (stroke opacity vs dab opacity) can be fixed
mathematically. Grep for
I have a little gripe about setting exclusive visibility (shift+click a
layer's visibility icon) in an image. Now that we have layer groups in GIMP
2.8, it only functions on the top level of the layer stack -- it seems
impossible to toggle exclusive visibility inside a group.
Since a layer
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 11:21:35 +0200
From: gfx.u...@online.de
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] feature: Set exclusive layer visibility within
groups
It's a bit hard to understand what you mean exactly in your further
writing. Can you write down a state
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 17:28:53 +0200
From: lis...@jesusda.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Export issues
Another issue appears when open a JPG image, edit it and close.
Instead of saving the image using the same original formt and
parameters, Gimp try to
Whoops, had a suspicion I was forgetting something on my previous message.
Attached is another mockup illustrating some improved(?) eye icons.
- Right column shows what the icon would look like with the slash trimmed 3px
from each end.
- Second row has the slash lightened by 50% (now grey
compiler at this time. :( But it should fix both
issues if it works.
-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com
Numbers may not lie, but neither do they tell the whole truth.
js
--
On 3 June 2012 17:30, Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com wrote:
(Apologies
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:48:40 +0200
From: gfx.u...@online.de
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] feature: Set exclusive layer visibility within
groups
Hi,
I posted descriptions of the current behaviour and the proposals in the
wiki. Now it's on you ;-)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:21:47 -0400
From: ke...@ve3syb.ca
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Bring back normal save
On 12-06-06 12:21 PM, � wrote:
Btw, why can we open a JPG but not save a JPG, if we export to
JPG should we than not has import JPG files
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:03:41 +0200
From: g...@catking.net
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Bring back normal handling of other file formats
[...]
Gimp's inability to work with standard formats is becoming a major PITA.
Perhaps gimp was not such a bad
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:03:41 +0200
From: g...@catking.net
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Bring back normal handling of other file formats
AT this point, I often need to check the resulting file size.
If I go to Image | Properties I find the file name and
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:22:43 +1000
From: grae...@argyllcms.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Bring back normal handling of other file
formats
Simon Budig wrote:
This discussion really boils down to a matter of taste and there are
arguments
From: pe...@mmiworks.net
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 17:58:33 +0200
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Bring back normal handling of other file
formats
Richard Gitschlag wrote:
So if I may throw an echo into the room and ask why the particular message
Now I remembered what I wanted to say earlier. I can't remember in response to
whom exactly, but here goes.
Save must record everything that is part of the document; that is the law.
That law also works in reverse.
If you write to a file format that cannot support everything in the
open
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Ditch the Save a Copy command (really)
From: pe...@mmiworks.net
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 00:50:33 +0200
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
Richard Gitschlag wrote:
Seriously -- I propose that the Save a Copy... command should
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 06:05:07 -0700
From: doodoodee...@yahoo.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] GIMP 2.8 less productive than GIMP 2.6 (too many
dialogue boxes)
---
To: GIMP devs and users
Having recently made the upgrade to GIMP 2.8, it's
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:06:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Ditch the Save a Copy command (really)
From: ccurt...@gmail.com
To: pe...@mmiworks.net
CC: strata_ran...@hotmail.com; gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
That Save does not lose information seems natural, but that Export must
lose
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 21:21:46 +0200
From: calculemus1...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Multiply blend mode in GIMP
I am reading this: docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-concepts-layer-modes.html
and I wonder why is the formula for Multiply, E = (M * I) / 255?
Why
I.2. Two-faced sliders, usability
I have nothing against coarse and fine grain tuning for brush sizes but the
sizes I generally work with (i.e. 1-100px) (and I'm sure I'm not the only
one) confine the usable range to 1-10% of the whole slider area!
I agree that the current slider behavior
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 22:23:27 -0700
From: phorg...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] What about switching from Gtk+ to Qt
On 07/29/2012 05:17 AM, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 02:51:44PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Do we need to
From: oleca...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 19:28:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] File - Page Setup missing in 2.8, why it
matters
To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
1 - Unable to specify Landscape orientation.
Second tab of the Print dialog.
Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
1 - Unable to specify Landscape orientation.
Second tab of the Print dialog.
Shall we compare screenshots then?
Shall we compare operating systems then? :)
Works just fine on Linux
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 11:34:00 +0100
From: ad...@game-point.net
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org; gegl-developer-l...@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?
I've looked around and it looks like GIMP doesn't have anything like
Photoshop's shape layers. Shape layers
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:02:53 +0100
From: ad...@game-point.net
To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org; gegl-developer-l...@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Shape layers for GIMP?
On 08/09/2012 18:29, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
There's a slightly faster
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 02:11:38 -0700
From: m351...@rtrtr.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Gimp suggestions and maybe a bug
Hello , leave suggestions for the good Gimp
- when save/export a photo that have exif/iptc/xmp tags if we save/export to
formats
- is uncomfortable, and often painful.
-- Burnie
On 09/16/2012 08:10 AM, Richard Gitschlag wrote:
From: l...@holoweb.net
To: ofn...@laposte.net
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:23:36 -0400
CC: gimp-user-l...@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] [Request] Do not confirm closing if unsaved
I'm going to direct this to the gimp-developer mailing list instead of just
gimp-user for further explanation.
What is the method by which GIMP decides the default filename in the Export
dialog?
-- Stratadrake
strata_ran...@hotmail.com
Numbers may not lie, but neither do
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:50:33 +0400
From: alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Save/export, option to go back to old behaviour
This has been discussed a dozen of times. One of these days I'll
really finish the new FAQ so that we
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:55:26 +0200
From: alexiade...@gmail.com
To: gespert...@gmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Minor enhancements in the export dialog
Current order in git is for format AFAIK:
1. last export of this image
2. imported
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 00:31:06 -0300
From: gespert...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Minor enhancements in the export dialog
I'm adding an extra item to the list:
I also had several of reports about people choosing the file filter
dropdown (in
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:12:22 +0100
From: kolbjo...@stuestoel.no
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection lost while working on multiple
images. Missing feature or bug?
Den 17.02.2013 20:22, skreiv Tobias Oelgarte:
Hello,
I open two images in Gimp
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:12:22 +0100
From: kolbjo...@stuestoel.no
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Selection lost while working on multiple
images. Missing feature or bug?
Den 17.02.2013 20:22, skreiv Tobias Oelgarte:
Hello,
I open two images in Gimp
...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/19 Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com
So the question that remains is - if you switch between images and do
another select with the same tool, why does GIMP need to Undo the first
one
at all? It's got to be a bug.
No doubt it is a bug
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:07:35 -0300
From: freewande...@rocketmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] unified transform tool
Well, that's something that was puzzling my mind: How an icon for
unified transform would look like? I was even trying it out as
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:16:28 -0500
From: l.elle.st...@gmail.com
To: pe...@mmiworks.net
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] now: project ideas, was: unified transform tool
One thing I wish Gimp had is a better eyedropper tool for checking
color values. That
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:14:14 -0300
From: gespert...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp gradients
El 10/03/13 11:10, rafał rush escribió:
Hi
Gradients in gimp are very very painful thing. I love gimp and i used it
a lot but gradients are
BTW, this is my personal usecase scenario where editing a gradient in GIMP was
unexpectedly a painful thing:
I was trying to create a sepia-like gradient -- a gradient that fades from
black to sepia (for simplicity, let's just say RGB #804000) to white. Y'know,
something I can just Gradient
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:18:10 -0300
From: gwid...@mpc.com.br
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp gradients
To all people complaining about how hard it is today to edit a gradient -
The most usable way I have to edit gradients in GIMP is actually quite
From: ccurt...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:27:23 -0400
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Cutting the bloat out of .GDYN files
To: strata_ran...@hotmail.com
CC: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Richard Gitschlag strata_ran...@hotmail.com
wrote:
How easy
Really tempted to file this in the bugtracker but I'm going to ask here first.
Current situation: None of my painting tools actually work. Every time I try
to use them, GIMP 2.8.4's statusbar tells me No paint dynamics available.
It's an easy thing to fix locally, and I will be doing that in
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 10:34:29 +0300
From: andrey.krieger.ut...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] How Print Size can save pixel density into e.g.
png file?
I use the feature of changing image print density (in dpi) in GIMP to
get predictable size of
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:52:04 -0300
From: yafuli...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] [Request] Improve Stroke Path capabilities
[...] the ability to use gradients [...]
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:08:53 +0200
From: ofn...@laposte.net
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Paths need better display of on-canvas
transform tools
If you have a selection the transform tool handles are on the
boundaries of the selection... (the tool
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:58:05 -0300
From: yafuli...@gmail.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: [Gimp-developer] Brush from Clipboard: Imperfections with some
dynamics
In this example:
http://nsae01.casimages.net/img/2013/07/01/130701034929273527.png
I used the brush
This is a tangent related to the matter that the first time you do an export
command from a GIMP session there is no practical difference between Ctrl+E
(Export) and Shift+Ctrl+E (Export To). Now, of course, the first time you do a
Save command there is no difference between Ctrl+S (Save) and
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 20:15:23 -0800
From: akk...@shallowsky.com
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Quick-edit workflow
I've found that the new model makes me stop and think every time
I save or export anything. For one thing, I'm still confused about
the
From: pe...@mmiworks.net
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:25:47 +0100
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Quick-edit workflow
I think I can see what Akkana means: when there is no export
target, the menu items are “Export to” and “Export...”
that is not ideal. and
55 matches
Mail list logo
