Testing
-Yosh
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Test. Woohow.
-Yosh
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
A new prerelease for 1.2.3 is now on the FTP site:
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.2/testing/gimp-1.2.3-pre2.tar.gz
This is a testing release, not an official stable release. If there aren't
any problems with this though, the real 1.2.3 release will appear soon.
If you think you found a bug,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 07:57:01PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Raphael Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Rebecca J. Walter wrote:
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 05:53, syngin wrote:
Would it not be a better idea to figure out the country of origin for
those
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 08:06:19PM +, Adam D. Moss wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
mct:~ gimp-1.3
gimp-1.3: fatal error: Segmentation fault
gimp-1.3 (pid:9613): [E]xit, [H]alt, show [S]tack trace or [P]roceed: s
#0 0x40550924 in g_on_error_stack_trace (prg_name=0xb833
Finally, at long last, GIMP 1.2.3:
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.2/v1.2.3/
There are numerous bug fixes in this release, see the ChangeLog for details.
Also, in this release, all the binaries have been versioned (i.e., have a
-1.2 appended) so that both gimp 1.2 and 1.3 can coexist in the
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:36:17AM +0300, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
On Tue, 12 Mar 2002, Tomas Ogren wrote:
rsync --delete -vaz --exclude manual --exclude users/ ftp.gimp.org::ftp/
/export/ftp/mirror/gimp.org/
Works fine for me.
Thanks, do I need to get an access to rsync server ?
I
There is a testing prelease up for GIMP 1.2.4:
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.2/testing/
Please give it a whirl, and report any problems you might have to bugzilla.
You'll need GTK 1.2.8 or any later GTK 1.2.
This is only a prerelease, it should *not* be included in any larger
software
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:02:46PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
It turns out the bug is caused by Trio, the printf/scanf
implementation included in GLib 2.2, and used on for instance
Win32. (The main cause to use Trio instead of the C library's
printf/scanf on some platform is that the C
GIMP 1.2.5 has found it's way on to the FTP site:
ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/v1.2/v1.2.5/
This is a minor bugfix release. Notably the build error in gimp-remote has
been fixed.
The following bugs were fixed (thanks to Dave Neary for compiling this list):
Bug # Description
--
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 08:54:55PM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
At 11:42 PM + 8/13/03, Phil Harper wrote:
as for TIFF, you wouldn't be able to do it in a standard readable TIFF,
This, however, is wrong! We can represent EVERYTHING in
GIMP today, and EVERYTHING for GEGL (etc.)
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:16:13AM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
At 11:42 PM -0700 8/13/03, Manish Singh wrote:
Supports IEEE floats, but not float16 (a 32-bit float cut in half). RH
added this to filmgimp since they had established this format in their
workflow with other tools already
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:38:01AM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
At 8:12 PM -0700 8/13/03, Manish Singh wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 10:53:14PM -0400, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
At 6:51 PM -0700 8/13/03, Manish Singh wrote:
Does TIFF support, for example, float16 data, or a CIE XYZ
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 06:20:43PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 18:04, Rapha??l Quinet wrote:
We cannot easily change that address because that would require changing
all gimp bugs, which are using this as the contact address. But as I
suggested during GIMPcon,
I just moved the old index back, with the postponement of the vote, the
protest page is not as relevant.
-Yosh
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:01:32PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That means that over the next hours, tens of thousands of people will
point there browsers to www.gimp.org. Some people in the foruns,
including me, have provided links to
Forwarding due to list troubles...
-Yosh
- Forwarded message from Ben Liblit [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Ben Liblit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: binaries available from the Cooperative Bug Isolation Project
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:09:29 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:11:03PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
lets take a different approach.
when you don't have the money to pay for the flight to represent the
gimp at a conference or whatever the event, you won't be volunteering.
i was unable to fund a flight to las vegas to represent
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:09:04PM +, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
standard libray versioning scheme is to set soname to
libname.major (library being named libname.major.minor
on filesystem)
Don't get confused by the numbers, libgimp-2.0 is the
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:30:26PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 01:25:24PM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since the major is not anymore unique (eg gimp-2.0.23 will provide
libgimp-2.0.so.23 with the same major as libgimp-1.3.so.23 from
gimp
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:13:30PM +, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Roger Leigh writes:
They both have to implement fork() using Windows calls though,
which can never be efficient.
(Just rambling here:)
I wonder, could the typical fork() immeditaly followed by exec() (in
the child
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Since it talks specifically about GIMP python,
which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time in gimp 1.3
(no kidding --- I've been on gimp 1.2 with my python fu stuff so far),
it is interesting to mention that as
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 09:24:54PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
On Sunday 14 December 2003 18:36, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 05:41:59PM -0200, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
Since it talks specifically about GIMP python,
which me, by chance, was trying for the very first time
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Not at all. GTK+ lived in the GIMP source tree until it was
capable of being a standalone project. Afterwards, its main
developers were gimp developers. Unfortunately, several of them
followed the path which GTK+ has become to go on
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:35:09AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Manish Singh wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 06:15:17PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
The point is that as it is, gegl is not a standalone project.
But it *is* a standalone project. That's been the intent from the
beginning.
I don't see
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 09:27:17AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
What is wrong about depending on GEGL and have people download and
compile it separately? GTK+ used to live in the GIMP source tree for
historical reasons only. I strongly doubt anyone would have wanted to
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 06:59:57PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Porting GTK2 to Quartz could bring some improvements but it isn't a
prerequisite for a good user experience of The GIMP on Mac OS X. The
one thing that is a lot more important at the moment is to fix bug
#102058:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:58:33PM +0100, Branko Collin wrote:
On 30 Dec 2003, at 21:47, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 17:18:11 +0100, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 30 Dec 2003, at 9:48, Rapha?l Quinet wrote:
I think that the goal was to move to a better machine
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 09:20:56PM +0100, Hans Breuer wrote:
Am 27.12.2003 um 09:39 schrieb Manish Singh:
I just checked in an POSIX shm tile transport implementation. I'd like
someone on OS X to test it, since I'm not 100% sure how POSIX
compliant OS X
is, but I'm reasonably sure it works
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
David G??mez [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've scanned some jpeg images with a 24bit depth. Some of them are old
photographies in blackwhite that show 'bands' when are displayed on
a 16 bit depth display. After digging in
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:41:46AM +0100, David Odin wrote:
Hi,
as you may know, the files libgimp/gimpmisc.[ch] have been split into
libgimp/gimppixelfetcher.[ch] and libgimp/gimpregioniterator.[ch]. Can
you do the necessary changes to keep cvs history for these files? This
is
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
[restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff]
GSR - FR ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100):
[technical discussion :)]
I think I already explained why I prefer
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 04:13:19AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it
just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes.
True.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:51:17PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 01:24:15AM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the bulk of the code in gimp that causes warnings is stuff like:
void foo (void **p);
void bar (void)
{
int *i;
foo ((void
On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 11:46:35PM -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Greetings.
The 1.3.2 of the sample plug-in (gimp-plugin-template) uses some
features that are deprecated in the latest CVS version of the GIMP. It
is also missing an argument to one function call. The attached patch
allows the
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 04:14:10PM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
Simons agruments, however, smell a lot of standard gimp extension
language, because his goal is to have one language that is always pat
of gimp, which would effectively be a standard. I don't think that's a
bad idea at all,
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 08:35:04AM +0100, Marc A. Lehmann wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:35:08PM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
currently, and go beyond that with a full gtk and gimp binding. The
same should be done for python (I have plans to do this) and perl, the
idea
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh sure, out of all the bindings, perl comes closest by far to full
coverage. But iirc it doesn't wrap libgimpcolor, libgimpmath, some
of libgimpwidgets, and libgimpthumb.
We
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 11:14:30PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Alan Horkan wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Carol Spears wrote:
it is going to be a tough act to follow robin rowe and cinepaint.
I know you are funny sometimes but we all know Robin reads this list and
such comments dont
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:11:02PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 14 Mar 2004 02:50:09 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fink and Darwinports are simply not options for mainline OS X
users. Mac users want to
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 05:21:04PM -0800, Carol Spears wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Aaron Voisine wrote:
I'll add something on the wiki as soon as my Gimp.app
source forge project gets accepted and I can put in a
link to it.
hmm, do we need to add the upload plugin
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
[stuff deleted]
The only thing that struck me as missing was the work involved with
porting the plug-ins to the new API, but Rapha?l already pointed
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 10:50:23AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 08:56:36AM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
[stuff deleted]
The only thing that struck
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 01:34:02AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:58:25AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote:
For scheme we could do something like this:
(script-fu-foo-bar '(imageimage)
'(drawable
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:55:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great. Now, when you say it I remember Sven mentioning it in the past.
But I guess that this new interface is not exported yet to any of
the language bindings? Is that correct? Any plans when this API
will become active?
It's
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:39:23AM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
It is utterly ridiculous that simply because I voiced concerns about and
would like for the ability to have gimp scripts execute properly from the
command line under Windows that you accuse me of making the GIMP suck.
The suggestions
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:01:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
based on any particular language but just consists of:
gimp_foo -bar 3 -baz yellow
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
A PDB revamp is planned.
How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb,
which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard
any concrete plans for the often-mentioned
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:32:08PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:48 PM
snip
FWIW, the suggestion was ill-researched. (foo image=bar) is so very very
un-Scheme like, which is surprising to hear
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 05:57:04PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
If it's important to you, you'll do the 10 mins of research and critical
thinking needed.
Apparantly you could research this a whole lot faster than I can, which
isn't surprising since you work with gimp development almost
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:20:14PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Do a 2.2 release in about three months.
I think that's unrealistically short at this stage. There are people
who have said that they want to do some concrete and long-standing
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:22:23PM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 02:19:09PM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While on that subject, I'm wondering what a good way of representing
named parameters in scheme and perl would be. Any thoughts?
This is natural
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
What requirements would the new PDB have?
There's a number of issues to be addressed, like GEGL node support
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 12:06:33PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
What
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:53:28PM +0100, Michael Natterer wrote:
Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, something has to generate those coords, and something has to update
the UI before painting is finished.
I was asking more in terms of an API should look like. Interactive
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:27:04AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 07:48:59PM -0800, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what would be a good way for perl to support both named and positional
stuff?
It simply shouldn't. It should either do positional where
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 12:44:51AM -0700, Robin Rowe wrote:
Dave,
It seems like you're limiting refactoring to code re-use via
extraction to libraries.
No, I'm using the same definition that Mat refers to:
Refactoring is a disciplined technique for restructuring an existing body
of
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 09:11:49PM +0200, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
snip
But it's pretty
clear that you never bother to do any research before posting.
snip
You must
have some weird sort of logic goes on in your head that made you conflate
these things.
snip
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 07:19:20PM -0400, Christopher Curtis wrote:
Manish Singh wrote:
snipped out: the fact that clueless Robin completely missed the point that
there was plenty of refactoring done into GPL libraries, quite independent
of the PDB infastructure.
[...]
misinformation about
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:18:02PM +1000, Owen wrote:
I just built 2.1.0 with --enable-python but there was no python on the menus.
So I went and built 2.0.1 --enable-python and configure failed because I didn't have
pygtk
Installed that and rebuilt both. Python now shows in the menus.
On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 12:28:07PM -0300, Rodrigo Severo wrote:
Hi,
I'm having problems compiling Gimp 2.0.1 on my Conectiva Linux 9 machine.
The error is:
if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../app
-I/usr/local/gtk+/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/glib/include/glib-2.0
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 06:15:03PM +1200, Joseph Heled wrote:
While starting each plugin as a separate process has it's advantages, gdb
interaction is certainly not one of them.
For example, right now I bring the plugin dialog up, then look up in the
process list for it, and attach it to
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:08:23PM +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
struct _GPConfig
{
guint32 version;
guint32 tile_width;
guint32 tile_height;
gint32 shm_ID;
gdouble gamma;
gint8install_cmap;
gint8show_tool_tips;
gint32 min_colors;
gint32 gdisp_ID;
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 12:12:46PM -0700, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
thanks Sven and Carol for your answers... I'll get back to you with more
details about the GUI, as i'm working on an art project at the moment,
but to answer some immediate queries:
- I'm using Photoshop 7.0 -
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 12:15:22PM +0530, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
Manish Singh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to Daniel, Sven, gimp-developer
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
...
t's a whole bunch of contortions, and all pointless since amd64
hardware
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
On 12.11.2004, at 18:51, Manish Singh wrote:
You can, but not using the typical APIs. This is pretty important
for database stuff
Whose use case is very different than GIMP's. And you do use the
typical
APIs, but the user
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
David Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If this could be done today, that would be a great solution
(imho).
I wouldn't wait for this to happen if I was you. The news system
hasn't been resurrected for several months so I
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:20PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
The news was fixed last night. The contest will be worked on soon.
In case you hadn't noticed, we're due a release next week. How
soon is soon?
Today.
Please take the current contest down. It should
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:37:00PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:01:20PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
In case you hadn't noticed, we're due a release next week. How
soon is soon?
Today.
If you want to do the work of changing all
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 09:04:04PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:37:00PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
If you want to do the work of changing all the places that things
have been said now, be my guest. Let me know, I'll blog the new
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:49:43PM -0500, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 18:36:29 +0100
Robert L Krawitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There could be plenty of other reasons why, of course. But it isn't
FUD for people to
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:51:00AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( Marc) (A.) (Lehmann ) writes:
Would you mind to explain what sort of problems that would be? If we
mozilla ./file
= file not acesssible (permission denied, other user, inaccessible dir)
= file
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:56:16AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
On 27.02.2005, at 01:19, Sven Neumann wrote:
just curious, is it expected that configuration of a GIMP
build will fail if configure cannot find a C++ compiler?
That question would better be asked on the autoconf list. While you
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:44:47AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
On 26.02.2005, at 23:44, Sven Neumann wrote:
What's wrong with $(top_builddir)?
Ho hum. That's a relative path as well, so instead of
-I.. that would be -I$(top_builddir)/app which gets
expanded to -I../../app . We could do
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:53:37AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
On 27.02.2005, at 01:14, Sven Neumann wrote:
We would probably have to add this to all Makefile.am in the app
subdirs then?!
Only to those containing sources which refer to automatically
generated headers, about 3 or 4.
No, we
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 03:07:01AM +0100, Daniel Egger wrote:
On 27.02.2005, at 02:50, Manish Singh wrote:
We should do -I$(top_builddir)/app. This avoids needing to care about
how deep the directory is, in case the directory is moved elsewhere.
But that's still not the cure for all
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
GIMP 1.2 is not any longer supported (for quite a while already). Your
best bet is to update to GIMP 2.2. That will also give you the benefit
that you don't any longer need to run an X server with
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:35:42PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
Manish Singh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 06:11:26PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
GIMP 1.2 is not any longer supported (for quite a while already). Your
best bet is to update to GIMP 2.2
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:57:49PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
Michael Schumacher wrote:
Andrei Simion wrote:
At gimp.org they don't have downloads for 2.2. If you say it works,
this is good. But why they don't say the same on the web site.
If you're looking for binaries, Fedora
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:18:21AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi Jay,
Jay Cox a ?crit :
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:41 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
- Work on a framework to make plug-in settings saveable across
sessions (this might be done now, is it?)
Persistent parasites can easily be used
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:17:55AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh a ?crit :
There are also persistent parasites that can be attached to the app.
This is how the png plugin stores its default settings currently. They
are backed by gimpdir/parasiterc.
Jay pointed this out too
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
mentor someone on the shapes tool, we need a mentor for the plug-in
system. There is a related resource distribution project for gDesklets
in the bounties already - some coordination might be possible.
I can do that. Anyone doing
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 08:48:33AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Sunday 19 June 2005 01:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to compile the list of things that bother me about the
GTK+ file chooser and submit it to bugzilla someday. I know I'm
not the only one being bothered with it's design.
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 12:30:02PM +, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
Some symbols (including save_d) are missing in the latest update of
aalib
Yes, the debian maintainer made a bogus change:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315606
Downgrade aalib for now.
-Yosh
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:02:54AM +0200, lode leroy wrote:
the autodetection of python on MSYS is not too good:
the \es need to be replaced with /es, so I added this to
Where did it screw up? You sure you are using a CVS snapshot with all
the relevant changes? The ChangeLog should have:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 09:20:29PM -0400, Andrei Simion wrote:
Hi,
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Andrei Simion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are deleting the images, aren't you?
No, in all tutorials I read they return the image to be saved at the
end of the main method in the script.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:58:35PM -0400, woc wrote:
On 8/24/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perl probably has similar limitations, to a certain extent. Perl
handles text best -- binary data, it's best at simply passing... I
believe the term is ad verbatim or something.
So it
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:49:50PM -0400, woc wrote:
On 8/24/05, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can use Perl or Python to write a file format plugin. Script-fu is a
nonstarter, there's no way to register a load/save handler from a script
(though there could be in the future
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 02:34:28PM -0400, woc wrote:
On 8/24/05, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the python bindings are disted with GIMP, though not on Windows.
This will change with GIMP 2.4 though.
If you care about Windows, you should've said so from the beginning
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:56:12AM -0500, Lance Dockins wrote:
Sven Neumann wrote:
And if you ask, please describe your problems in detail. I
have left my crystal ball at home today so I really can't figure out
what some missing key libraries at the end of the build are.
I was asking more
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:45:56AM +1100, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On 12/21/05, miriam clinton (iriXx) wrote:
example images of too much cleaveage for a mailing list kthx. there are
women on this list too
This is just photogtaphy, not even
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Axel Wernicke wrote:
Am 11.02.2006 um 15:14 schrieb Scott:
I am sure I will eventually fix GIMP or come up with a work around, at
which point I will forward the info on for your consumption.
so, may be we should kick this issue to GIMP-dev and ask
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:03PM +, John Cupitt wrote:
Of course, OpenDocument document structure (ZIP archive with multiply
files inside) could be followed.
Yes, this sounds much more sensible.
As a concept, yes. Actually using ZIP is a stupid decision, and I wonder
what the
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:36:41PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Manish Singh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 03:30:03PM +, John Cupitt wrote:
Of course, OpenDocument document structure (ZIP archive with multiply
files inside) could be followed.
Yes, this sounds
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:43:12AM +0100, Kleistereimer wrote:
how to use gimp_path_get_points from a python plugin?
here some samplecode:
def somefunc(image):
floatarray = []
for i in range(100):
floatarray.append(0.0)
closed = 0
count = 0
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 07:59:08PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
Just write a pygimp script normally, and call it via gimp's batch mode.
-Yosh
I would prefer another solution, since I have some processing to do in
the external script and possibly a bunch of data to transfer back and
forth, so
On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 02:58:12PM +0200, Ministeyr wrote:
Manish Singh wrote:
By the way, I thought the batch mode only understood scheme, so it
would make the whole thing even more complicated.
One line of scheme to call your python script won't increase the
complexity appreciably
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:10:54PM +0200, Zephyr wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to compile My Very Own GIMP From CVS (TM) and play with the
code, explore it etc. As it should be just my playground, I don't want
to install it system-wide and possibly endanger my stable GIMP 2.2.10
installed from RPM.
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 11:03:48AM +0200, Alex Fernandez wrote:
i cannot give any kind of
logical reason for it and probably you should do the right thing and
trash this suggestion of mine.
Yes, it is the usual email pollution.
You're guilty of the same. Looking at the archives, you speak
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:36:09PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
advantage of their sysadmin
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
