On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:30:22PM +, Martin Bradley wrote:
I don't want to try to get your code working because I know nothing
about Python, I know it is a good language. The other reason I'm not
happy using it is that it adds another layer of software to a solution
that should work on
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:17:25PM +0100, Juergen Weber wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 12:05 AM, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg wrote:
That isn't possible at this time. What you are asking for is along
the lines of what is asked for in GIMP bug #51937.
See
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:24:36PM +0100, David Marrs wrote:
Perhaps I'm in danger of starting an argument here but some of your points
surprise me a little.
Manish Singh wrote:
Maybe the creator of GimpShop should have respected the GIMP community
instead of rejecting it. He did
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:16:56AM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Manish Singh wrote:
The GPL allows forks, but doesn't require the organization
that was forked from to provide support to the fork.
True. However, I'm wondering if there's anyone here willing
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 05:36:44AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
On Sunday 08 July 2007 14:37:01 Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
I rather gather there are those who disparage gimpshop and wish it to
fail and those who wish it to succeed
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 02:42:22PM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
I rather gather there are those who disparage gimpshop and wish it to fail
and
those who wish it to succeed but are afraid of offending some members of the
former group.
Maybe gimp could benefit from a more catholic and
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:40:14PM +0100, David Woodfall wrote:
On (20:17 04/06/07), David Woodfall [EMAIL PROTECTED] put forth the
proposition:
I get this error when I run a batch command. How do I specify the
interpreter?
No batch interpreter specified, using the default
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:32:20AM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Chris Mohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06-02-07 11:26]:
I think you should try it - it may be failing to initialize for some
reason, hence it's absence from the menu/tree.
I *stand* corrected.
I do get an error:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 08:21:40AM -0700, steve kirby wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting this error in my gimp compile attempt:
gimp-composite-mmx.c:148: error: can't find a register
in class GENERAL_REGS while reloading asm
Aside from a few WARNINGS, configure looked happy.
Can somebody clue me
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:09:38PM -0700, Steven Howe wrote:
Hello,
I'm writing to this list a lot. Hope that's not a problem.
I'd like to 'checkpoint' my work after each Python-Fu script is run. I
building a image with multiple layers, using the Antiquing guide I found
on the gimp site as
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:10:15PM -0700, Steven Howe wrote:
pdb.gimp_get_image_list()
returns a list of ids, which are 32bit integers, not a list of images. I
Use gimp.image_list() instead, which returns a list of Image objects.
-Yosh
___
Gimp-user
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 08:58:52AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
And it ends with this:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/codegen.py, line 1707, in ?
sys.exit(main(sys.argv))
File /usr/share/pygtk/2.0/codegen/codegen.py, line 1698, in main
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:25:35AM -0600, Eric P wrote:
I'm lazy, and I don't feel like reading this entire thread (it seems to show
up on a regular basis on the list).
Were any new, constructive insights brought up? Anyone care to summarize
this thread on this exhausting topic?
Other
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:00:38AM +0100, xes garcia wrote:
hi all
I'm starting with python gimp related stuff
i want to edit an open image with python console
I've checked existing scripts and all of them are functions that are
first declared and then registered in gimp's plugin repository
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:23:14AM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
Manish Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote (in reply to Alan Horkan):
So Alan, before you make anymore posts relating to this topic again, you
need to make a non-trivial contribution to GIMP yourself to justify all
the time you
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 10:02:17PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Alan Horkan wrote:
BTW, there seems to be something broken with Marc's messages.
From: Marc Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although they are sent to the list...
Cc:
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 01:58:57AM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Carol Spears wrote:
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 23:28:44 -0700
From: Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alan Horkan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
GIMPUser Gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Gimp-user]
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:38:02PM -0600, Roland Hordos wrote:
can you proove your claim?
Sigh. Try googling is gimp a derogatory term. If you read the
sources at the first 10 hits and you still don't understand, then try
the next 15000.
That is not proof.
Search for just plain gimp on
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:32:46PM -0600, Roland Hordos wrote:
Unreal. Okay, here in Canada the google search I indicated brings up
the following in order of top ranking:
1) The first is this link where someone with Cerebral Palsy is
discussing the term Gimp and other derogatory terms
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:01:12AM -0600, Robert Citek wrote:
On Feb 28, 2006, at 12:20 AM, Manish Singh wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:01:05AM -0600, Robert Citek wrote:
Would you consider Gimpshop a successful fork?
Considering Gimpshop can't even keep their own website online, I'd
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:24:15AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Hi,
Selon Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
For Gimpshop, it was all about forking from the get go. There was no
discussion, no proposal in any of the several places to discuss GIMP
development. No other possibilities were
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:48:06AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
Selon Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Von: Dave Neary [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it was put in bugzilla, the patch would have been
refused, or we would have asked him to work on it.
That's how things are handled in
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 08:39:41PM -0500, Brendan wrote:
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 05:46, Manish Singh wrote:
Gimpshop slaps the people who know the code of gimp in the face, and
then expects gimp.org to take up the slack because they don't know how
to properly support a community. I don't
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:21:16PM -0600, Robert Citek wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Vytautas P. wrote:
1) shortcut key: S
Shortcut key for cloning is C. Although shortcut S you'll love to
aply after
cloning for smudgeing.
Right, for Gimp. I was referring to Gimpshop, which
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:19:46PM -0600, Robert Citek wrote:
Hello Carol,
On Feb 25, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Carol Spears wrote:
first thing. in keeping with the spirit of how gimpshop came to be, i
am curious if there are separate online resources for this
application.
they opted
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 12:01:05AM -0600, Robert Citek wrote:
On Feb 27, 2006, at 10:54 PM, Manish Singh wrote:
The guy who did Gimpshop decided to do his own thing, and didn't
consult
the community at all before doing it. Since he didn't engage the
community and those who actually know
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 06:05:14PM -0500, Scott wrote:
..on Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 05:27:36PM -0500, Scott wrote:
Actually the Intel version are faster IF your application is not running
in emulation mode. That being said, there are not a lot of applications
that are nativly supporting
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Axel Wernicke wrote:
Am 11.02.2006 um 15:14 schrieb Scott:
I am sure I will eventually fix GIMP or come up with a work around, at
which point I will forward the info on for your consumption.
so, may be we should kick this issue to GIMP-dev and ask
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 03:16:18AM +0100, Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Manish Singh wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 12:47:43AM +0100, Tristan Miller wrote:
Greetings.
I'm looking for the source package for the latest version of
gimp-python
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:10:50PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
To Manish Singh:
SuSE and YaST2 work as well or better than any other file install
utility at solving dependencies. Thing you fail to realize is that
-devel files are not dependencies. The main files don't need the
-devel files
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:14:29PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
On Saturday 10 December 2005 13:50, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
So, with installing glib2-devel, did that work? If not, install
gtk-devel, pango-devel, and atk-devel as well.
It's rather disappointing that after all these years
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
out emails.
A gimp-devel package
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 10:41:47AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 02:25:07AM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
A gimp-devel package *must* have a dependency that either directly or
indirectly pulls in glib-devel. If it doesn't, the package's dependency
specification
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:28:32PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-11-05 15:16]:
So yes, let's end this, and next time, stick to facts instead of your
emotional attachment to your distro.
So Pat offers his hand and you slap his face, cannot accept
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 01:27:17PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
On Sunday 11 December 2005 05:25, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
I put thought into it. As I pointed out in my other mail, it seems
like you're the one who didn't think things through before sending
out emails.
A gimp-devel package
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 03:54:33PM -0500, BandiPat wrote:
On Sunday 11 December 2005 15:13, Manish Singh wrote:
[...]
When distro people screw up and the support issues land here, I feel
justified to express my displeasure of having to clean up their
messes, especially since
To recap:
OP is having trouble building gimp-perl. He's told to install the
gimp-devel package. Fine advice, and something a newbie may not realize
at first.
Installing gimp-devel should've been enough, but he got another error.
After further analysis, it became apparent that he was missing the
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 06:20:17PM -0600, Myke C. Subs wrote:
Aaron Luptak wrote:
On 12/7/05, Myke C. Subs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Luptak wrote:
look at config.log - it found gimptool this time, but had another error.
http://mykec.com/mykec/config.log
Looks like you're
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 05:22:10PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Carol Spears [EMAIL PROTECTED] [12-09-05 17:05]:
Maybe Novell could consider rehiring some of their linux staff and
coming up with a distribution entitled Professionally Enabled. i
dunno, it has a certain flair and appeal
On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Warren Baird wrote:
BandiPat wrote:
It's simple, Apple strangles the Unix that is on the machine. If you
had a straight install of Unix without anything Apple over or under it,
you would see a dramatic increase in speed also.
I read an article
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:33:22PM -0800, Robert Kleemann wrote:
michael chang wrote:
perl scripts with the GIMP module can be loaded just like any
executable script; for example, if I have a script that uses GIMP
called myfile.pl and I go to that directory and call ./myfile.pl, it
will run.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 11:03:55AM +0200, Martin Lesser wrote:
Is it possible to create images with python-fu but without a GUI?
I tried
# PYTHONPATH=/usr/lib/gimp/2.0/python python
from gimpfu import *
img = gimp.Image(100, 100, RGB)
but this results in a glib-error:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 02:20:46PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Rikard Johnels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did a apt- dist-upgrade on my SuSE 9.2 system last night.
And now i cant run GIMP at all.
It starts, but as soon as i press any of the buttons File , Xtns or
Help
to load
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:46:12AM +, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 10:13 am, John R. Culleton wrote:
On Tuesday 14 June 2005 08:42 pm, Carol Spears wrote:
mr. culleton, i am going to respectfully ask the reason that after all
of this time you are not running a cvs
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:32:37PM +0200, Pierre-Alexis wrote:
Hi,
I believe Gimp it's Plugins may be compared to
Firefox it's Extensions (although it's maybe not
implemented identically).
And theres something I love with Firefox and it's
extensions : the update system.
This has been
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 12:15:15PM +0200, Rikard Johnels wrote:
Thats just the point!
I send a cc to the list at all times and have done so along our conversation.
And they just dont show up
You have nodupes turned on in your list subscription settings. Turn it
off you don't like it (this
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 11:12:13PM +0200, Ketil Froyn wrote:
Thanks for the responses. I guess one major limiting factor could be the
types used internally by the GIMP. For instance, if it does operations on
uint32 type variables internally, I'd think the compiler needs to be
pretty clever to
On Fri, Apr 08, 2005 at 01:27:24PM +0200, Reinhard Drube wrote:
is there a way to avoid that the whole file tree
is accessed upon 'file open'? Running gimp on a
unix machine with AFS client contacts every AFS
cell around the world. That lasts 15 minutes
for a simple file open! So I
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:22:32PM +0200, Reinhard Drube wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to avoid that the whole file tree
is accessed upon 'file open'? Running gimp on a
unix machine with AFS client contacts every AFS
cell around the world. That lasts 15 minutes
for a simple file open! So I am
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:08:03AM +0100, Alan Horkan wrote:
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:46:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Jonathan D Gibbons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gimp-user@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: GimpShop
Now, what I think would be really wonderful along these lines
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:03:13PM +0200, Michael Schumacher wrote:
Given that all the string changes in GimpShop occured in translatable
strings, one wonders why patching the source was needed at all. The only
other changes were to the menu files, which have been external since the
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:57:54PM -0800, Jeff Trefftzs wrote:
I recently upgraded to gimp-2.2.4 (and .3 before that), just after I
installed Red Hat Fedora Core 3 as my new latest-and-greatest operating
system. I'm running it on an AMD K6 processor, 450 Mhz, 256MB of RAM,
plenty of HD space.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:24:21PM -0800, William Skaggs wrote:
Cristian David wrote:
I downloaded the Picture Eastern Hemisphere 2048 by 2048 pixels
(7.1 MB TIFF) from
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/BlueMarble/ .
After this I tried to put another layer over the black
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:19:29PM +0200, Antti M?kel? wrote:
Hi,
Where can I set the default quality when saving JPEG images? The default 85
is too low, I want to use 98. I could not find a suitable setting anywhere,
either in config files or in menus. Where is it hidden?
Open up
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:35:23AM +0100, Andreas Waechter wrote:
Hello,
in Gimp, you can change the title of image windows (in File
- Preferences - Interface - Image Windows - Title Status).
But I could not find any help about the meaning of the
letters which are used in combination
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 09:27:25PM -0500, Mark D. Montgomery II wrote:
i think we are having some problems because i dont really understand how
gentoo works.
hehe.
Basically, it uses a package tree system (similar to debian I believe).
When you tell it to install a package, it
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:03:08AM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi Joszef,
Jozsef Mak wrote:
Can anyone explain why I cannot create an account for the contest page? I
tried every variations possible but nothing happens other than the same
page reappears over and over again asking to
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 03:34:04PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi all,
After a false start, the GIMP Splash Contest is now officially
open!
The contest runs until next Sunday, Midnight. Splash screens
should be the same size as jimmac's logo and have a pale band
across the bottom roughly
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 07:09:40PM +0100, Jogchum Reitsma wrote:
This is what configure says:
checking for TIFFReadScanline in -ltiff... no
checking for TIFFWriteScanline in -ltiff... no
checking for TIFFFlushData in -ltiff34... no
configure: WARNING: *** TIFF plug-in will not be built
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 03:50:00PM -0600, Adrian wrote:
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 04:14:34 -0700
Jakub Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the words:
On Mon, 2004-09-20 at 05:49 -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:08:41PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Carol Spears [EMAIL
On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 07:43:29PM +0200, Simon Budig wrote:
And you'd do yourself and your credibility a favor if you'd treat
personal emails with respect and not publish them on mailinglists.
Actually, they are public emails, but miguel is not subscribed to this
list so they are trapped in
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 10:08:30AM +0100, Colin Bannister wrote:
gtkimcontextxim.c:67: parse error before XICCallback
This has been addressed since GTK+ 2.4.2. The latest is 2.4.9. It's a
very good idea to use the latest version of things, unless you have a
very very good reason not to.
-Yosh
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 08:18:43PM +0200, johan wrote:
Hi,
I have something weard : i just installed gimp 2.0, once tried from
.deb, once from source. When I open gimp i receive the following message
:
gimp message : fontconfig version too old, The GIMP requires fontconfig
version 2.2.0
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:41:23PM -0600, Eric Pierce wrote:
To affect fonts in all GTK2 apps, I have the following in my ~/
.gtkrc-2.0 file
style user-font
{
font_name=century 12
}
widget_class * style user-font
The preferred way to do this is simply:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:09:55AM +0100, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote:
Dnia Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:27:45AM +0100, Sven Neumann napisa?:
It would certainly help if you could describe more precisely how the
scripts don't work.
Yes, sorry, about leaving that out.
Here it is:
[EMAIL
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:55:11AM +0100, Sven Burmeister wrote:
Sven Neumann schrieb:
Hi,
Sven Burmeister [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am using Suse 9.0 and KDE 3.1.4 with gimp 1.3.2
If that's really version 1.3.2 you are using then an update would long
be overdue.
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:00:51PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
I want to start a new thread to get this discussion (which I
consider important) back on track.
LOCATION
So far there are 5 propositions in various stages of development,
each of which has some + points and some - points.
1)
67 matches
Mail list logo
