Some points:
* These are not forums. This is a mailing list. Accessing it through the
unofficial gimpusers.com 'forum interface' doesn't change that fact.
* The official GIMP site has problems, mainly to do with lacking a
maintainer. It tends to be only updated on releases and other major events
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:18 PM, artao wrote:
I googled, but haven't found anything particularly recent regarding this.
You could have started with reading news at gimp.org, especially the
one from 2011-01-11 (PLANS FOR 2.8 AND BEYOND).
You next stops are:
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, David Gowers (kampu) wrote:
Just a minor correction...
Photoshop is still yet to properly support high bit depth (16/32bpc)
images -- instead it provides a small subset of operations.
Only if the last version you tried was CS2 :) They actually adjusted
lots
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 8:57 PM, artao wrote:
Aha, I misread the GIMP 2.8 announcements. I guess I thought
GEGL was inherently high bit depth. So, several years then is
fairly accurate?
It's hard to say. To the best of my knowledge, some bits of GIMP
are ready to be replaced with GEGL already,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:57 PM, artao for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
Aha, I misread the GIMP 2.8 announcements. I guess I thought GEGL was
inherently high bit depth. So, several years then is fairly accurate?
GEGL itself is inherently high bitdepth, the current integration of
GEGL in GIMP
