/1CTLgYg
I like most the Gimp 2.6 version, it has no pixelation, but black characters
have still sharp edges. ImageMagick is also not bad. But Gimp 2.8 version is not
for my . What is wrong here? Is there something to make it better?
TIA,
Gunnar
--
wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums
So, if you scale down to 51% (which is about 2x) you first do a 2px
Gaussian blur. Result here:
http://imgur.com/iZB3lmw
Do you agree that Gimp 2.6 version looks still out much better?
http://pasteboard.co/27ib9Dvx.png
Wbr,
Gunnar
--
wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums
printed docs.
Maybe I had post it in dev list?
Wbr,
Gunnar
--
wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List
such behavior.
TIA,
Gunnar
--
wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives
t view it from other perspective.
Thank you for thinking along, long live the Gimp!
Wbr,
Gunnar
--
wk_ (via www.gimpusers.com/forums)
___
gimp-user-list mailing list
List address:gimp-user-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/lis
