Hi,
A draft of Git Rev News edition 12 is available here:
https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-12.md
Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the
above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
this GitHub
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Johannes Schindelin
wrote:
> Hi Kirill,
>
> On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Kirill Likhodedov wrote:
>
>> > On 06 Feb 2016, at 17:21 , Johannes Schindelin
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > This is expected behavior of the Bash you
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones
---
Hi Karthik,
If you need to re-roll your 'kn/ref-filter-atom-parsing' branch, could
you please squash this (or something like it) into the relevant patch
(commit 6613d5f1, "ref-filter: introduce parsing functions for each valid
atom",
I found no evidence of such behavior in the source code.
Signed-off-by: Matt McCutchen
---
This is based on the maint branch, a08595f.
Documentation/git-clean.txt | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-clean.txt
Noticed-by: Ole Tange
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Ole Tange wrote:
> If file name too long it should just try to see if it is a reference
> to a revision.
Looks easy enough to fix.
setup.c | 2 +-
git diff first looks for a file, then looks if it is a reference to a
revision. If the file fails due to being too long, the diff fails:
$ git init
$ git diff
Hi Philip,
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Philip Oakley wrote:
> From: "Britton Kerin"
> >I upgraded from 2.5 to 2.7 and the branch names went from a light
> > green to dark green, the names of the tags are hard to read now.
> >
> > Is it possible to configure the branch name
Hi Kirill,
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Kirill Likhodedov wrote:
> > On 06 Feb 2016, at 17:21 , Johannes Schindelin
> > wrote:
> >
> > This is expected behavior of the Bash you are using. The commands that I
> > think would reflect your intentions would be:
> >
> > git
Dear Git users,
It is my pleasure to announce that Git for Windows 2.7.1 is available from:
https://git-for-windows.github.io/
Changes since Git for Windows v2.7.0(2) (February 2nd 2016)
New Features
??? Comes with Git 2.7.1.
Bug Fixes
??? Git GUI now starts properly even when
On Fri, 5 Feb 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
OK, as Brian said, that use case would need to be in the log message, at
least. I am curious, though, if you can give just a random string to
username, or at least that must match what the underlying authentication
mechanism uses.
Brian, I can see
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:12:54PM +0530, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Introduce remote_ref_atom_parser() which will parse the '%(upstream)'
>> and '%(push)' atoms and store information into the 'used_atom'
>> structure
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Introduce color_atom_parser() which will parse a "color" atom and
>> store its color in the "used_atom" structure for further usage in
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Introduce align_atom_parser() which will parse an 'align' atom and
>> store the required alignment position and width in the
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:30 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Introduce optional prefixes "width=" and "position=" for the align atom
>> so that the atom can be used as "%(align:width=,position=)".
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak
>> wrote:
>>> Introduce color_atom_parser() which will parse a
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
wrote:
> If you need to re-roll your 'kn/ref-filter-atom-parsing' branch, could
> you please squash this (or something like it) into the relevant patch
> (commit 6613d5f1, "ref-filter: introduce parsing functions for each
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Ok so I am not sure we even really need to use "-c" option in
> git-clone considering that we can just use the same flow we do for
> setting core.worktree values. I'll propose a patch with you two Cc'ed,
> which I think
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Christian Couder
wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Also the error is reported already in color_parse(...), so seems duplicated.
>>
>> git for-each-ref
On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Ramsay Jones
> wrote:
>> If you need to re-roll your 'kn/ref-filter-atom-parsing' branch, could
>> you please squash this (or something like it) into the
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Introduce contents_atom_parser() which will parse the '%(contents)'
>> atom and store information into the 'used_atom' structure based
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak
>> wrote:
>>> - const char *formatp = strchr(sp,
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak
>> wrote:
>>> +static void color_atom_parser(struct used_atom
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> @@ -138,10 +140,9 @@ int parse_ref_filter_atom(const char *atom, const char
>> *ep)
>> * shouldn't be used for
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> @@ -138,10 +140,9 @@ int parse_ref_filter_atom(const char *atom, const char
> *ep)
> * shouldn't be used for checking against the valid_atom
> * table.
> */
> -
I’ve faced a problem that `git show :` returns an error when
contains square brackets.
Interestingly, the problem is reproducible on "GNU bash, version
3.2.57(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin15)", but not on "zsh 5.0.7
(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)”. The problem is also reproducible when called from a
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:49 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Karthik Nayak wrote:
>> Parsing atoms is done in populate_value(), this is repetitive and
>> hence expensive. Introduce a parsing function which would let us
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:22 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> ---
>
> This is even more strange. Are the current callers broken and some
> sends value==NULL for an
On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 02:23:11PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
> Am 28.01.2016 um 00:45 schrieb f...@fuz.su:
> >>There is git get-tar-commit-id, which prints the commit ID if it
> >>finds a comment entry which looks like a hexadecimal SHA-1 hash.
> >>It's better than a hex editor at least. :)
> >
>
Hi Johannes,
thanks for your answer, but unfortunately it doesn’t help.
> On 06 Feb 2016, at 17:21 , Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
>
> This is expected behavior of the Bash you are using. The commands that I
> think would reflect your intentions would be:
>
>
Am 28.01.2016 um 00:45 schrieb f...@fuz.su:
There is git get-tar-commit-id, which prints the commit ID if it
finds a comment entry which looks like a hexadecimal SHA-1 hash.
It's better than a hex editor at least. :)
This is incredibly fuzzy and can get wrong for a pleothora of reasons.
I hope
Hi Kirill,
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016, Kirill Likhodedov wrote:
> Is it a bug or I just didn’t find the proper way to escape the brackets?
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> git init brackets
> cd brackets/
> echo ‘asd’ > bra[ckets].txt
> git add bra\[ckets\].txt
> git commit -m initial
In "mingw: fix t5601-clone.sh", this developer introduced a new test
executable, test-fake-ssh. Naturally, he forgot to update the .gitignore
file accordingly. This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
This is on top of 'next', of course.
32 matches
Mail list logo