RE: [PATCH v3] coccicheck: process every source file at once

> -Original Message- > From: Jeff King [mailto:p...@peff.net] > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 9:25 AM > To: SZEDER Gábor > Cc: Jacob Keller ; Keller, Jacob E > ; Git mailing list > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coccicheck: process every source file at once > > On

Re: [PATCH 0/2] add format specifiers to display trailers

On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 09:23 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jacob Keller writes: > > > > We have %s and %b so that we can reconstruct the whole thing by > > > using both.  It is unclear how %bT fits in this picture.  I > > > wonder > > > if we also need another placeholder

Re: [PATCH] rev-list: restore the NUL commit separator in --header mode

On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 15:39 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jacob Keller writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Dennis Kaarsemaker > > wrote: > > > > > > Commit 660e113 (graph: add support for --line-prefix on all > > >

Re: [PATCH v11 0/8] submodule inline diff format

On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 12:17 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Jacob Keller om> wrote: > > > > > @@ -487,12 +490,14 @@ static void do_submodule_path(struct strbuf > > *buf, const char *path, > > strbuf_addstr(buf, git_dir); >

Re: [PATCH v11 5/8] allow do_submodule_path to work even if submodule isn't checked out

On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 11:19 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jacob Keller writes: > > > > > Currently, do_submodule_path will attempt locating the .git > > directory by > > using read_gitfile on /.git. If this fails it just assumes > > the > > /.git is actually a git

Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] submodule inline diff format

On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 10:35 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > a) read_gitfile on /.git > > b) if read_gitfile succeeds, use it's contents, otherwise use > > /.git for next steps > > c) check if the resulting file is a git directory, we're fine.. we > > found a gitdir, so stop. > > d) otherwise,  

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xdiff: implement empty line chunk heuristic

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 15:44 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > > > Currently it's an "opt in" knob, so this doesn't make sense to me. > +static int diff_compaction_heuristic = 1; > Oops didn't know we'd made it default at some point. (all my versions had it disabled by default) > It's rather an

Re: [PATCH 2/2] xdiff: implement empty line chunk heuristic

On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 15:35 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Junio C Hamano > wrote: > > > > Jacob Keller writes: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Junio C Hamano > > m> wrote: > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sendemail: teach git-send-email to list aliases

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 18:56 -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 6:50 PM, Eric Sunshine om> wrote: > > Also, shouldn't --list-aliases (or --dump-aliases) be mutually > > exclusive with many of the other options? New tests would check > > such > >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] completion: add support for completing email aliases

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 18:33 -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Jacob Keller om> wrote: > > Using the new --list-aliases option from git-send-email, add > > completion > > for --to, --cc, and --bcc with the available configured aliases. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sendemail: teach git-send-email to list aliases

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 18:50 -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote: > It should be possible to extract the alias within the shell itself > without a separate process. For instance: > > read alias rest > > will leave the first token in $alias and the remainder of the line in > $rest, and it's all done

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sendemail: teach git-send-email to list aliases

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 18:30 -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Jacob Keller om> wrote: > > Add an option "list-aliases" which changes the default behavior of > > git-send-email. This mode will simply read the alias files > > configured by > >

Re: [PATCH] notes: document behavior of --ref and --notes DWIMery

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > How about phrasing it totally differently? > > The ref specifies the full refname when it begins with > `refs/notes/`; otherwise `ref/notes/` is prefixed to form a > full name of the ref. > > I think that would remove

Re: [PATCH] notes: document behavior of --ref and --notes DWIMery

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jacob Keller writes: > > > From: Jacob Keller > > > > The --notes and --ref parameter for selecting which notes ref to > > operate > > on are based off of expand_notes_ref

Re: [PATCH 2/2] refs: loosen restriction on wildcard * refspecs

On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 15:12 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Eric Sunshine sunsh...@sunshineco.com writes: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote: From: Jacob Keller jacob.kel...@gmail.com Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new

Re: Git tag: pre-receive hook issue

On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 13:13 +0530, Gaurav Chhabra wrote: Hi Jake, Thanks about the refs/tags check. I’m aware about this. Junio also explained it in one of his replies. I was actually confused why my current code was working in past for few of the annotated tags. Anyways, now that I have

Re: Problem with architecture git.

On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 15:12 +, Alexander wrote: Hello, I have problem with architecure of my project, help me to resolve problem . I want to do in my remote repo two branches with two different working folders (master , dev ) to check it . How can I do it ? Thank you. Sounds

Re: [PATCH] gitk: Add a Copy commit summary command

On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 13:34 -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:42 AM, dev+...@drbeat.li wrote: From: Beat Bolli dev+...@drbeat.li When referencing earlier commits in new commit messages or other text, one of the established formats is commit abbrev-sha

RE: git notes from incoming patch

-Original Message- From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:14 PM To: Keller, Jacob E Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: git notes from incoming patch Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: I am wondering whether

git notes from incoming patch

Hi, I am wondering whether it is possible to read from a format-patch input and add notes when we generate the applied patch. The use case is to be able to send patches that had notes appended via $git format-patch --notes ... And have notes objects created on the remote repository to store

git fetch specific ref fails when run against a remote where HEAD points to missing master branch

Hi, I am assuming this is simply a configuration issue on my end for this particular remote, because I never pushed to the master branch, and so the HEAD of this remote doesn't exist. However, I am also using it to fetch specific refs I know the name of, so it confuses me when I try to fetch and

Re: [PATCH 8/9] autoconf: Check for timer_settime

On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 14:08 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Karsten Blees karsten.bl...@gmail.com writes: While the timer extension (timer_settime) has graduated to mandatory in the current POSIX spec, the monotonic clock extension is still optional today (i.e. not necessarily supported even

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2014, #01; Tue, 2)

On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 12:18 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Johannes Sixt j...@kdbg.org writes: But IMHO, this topic goes in a wrong direction. Avoid deprecated interfaces is way overrated. It would be preferable (IMHO) to implement setitimer() in compat/ for systems that don't have it. I

Re: revert top most commit

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 17:22 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Keller, Jacob E wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:14 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote: I am having trouble using revert. If I attempt to $ git revert sha1id where sha1id is the same as the HEAD commit, I instead get the output

Re: revert top most commit

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 17:22 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Keller, Jacob E wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:14 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote: I am having trouble using revert. If I attempt to $ git revert sha1id where sha1id is the same as the HEAD commit, I instead get the output

revert top most commit

Hi, I am having trouble using revert. If I attempt to $ git revert sha1id where sha1id is the same as the HEAD commit, I instead get the output of what looks like git status. Is there anything specific about git revert that prevents it from reverting the most recent commit? Thanks, Jake

Re: Improving the git remote command

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 13:35 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: David Aguilar dav...@gmail.com writes: We have some internal scripts at Disney Animation that rely on git remote output so I would vote for #3 personally as well. I take it that you mean you would vote _against_ #3 which will break

Re: revert top most commit

On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 18:15 -0400, David Turner wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 21:14 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote: Hi, I am having trouble using revert. If I attempt to $ git revert sha1id where sha1id is the same as the HEAD commit, I instead get the output of what looks like

Re: cherry picking and merge

On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:56 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: Since everything I do goes up and down into repositories and I don’t want my friends and family to scorn me, rebase isn’t the command I want to use. You completely mis-understand what published means. Published history is history from which

Re: cherry picking and merge

On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 17:36 +, Keller, Jacob E wrote: On Fri, 2014-08-01 at 09:56 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: Since everything I do goes up and down into repositories and I don’t want my friends and family to scorn me, rebase isn’t the command I want to use. You completely mis-understand

Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] stash: default listing to --cc --simplify-combined-diff

On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 20:09 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 12:43:09PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: git log --cc is one of the things I wanted for a long time to fix. When the user explicitly asks --cc, we currently ignore it, but because we know the user wants to view

Re: [PATCH v10] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:48 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command line option will override this configured value, using the exact same syntax. Cc: Jeff King p...@peff.net Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com

Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] usage: make error functions a stack

routines; - set error/warning routines to its own custom versions; - call the callees; - set error/warning routines back to their original; and - return from it at least in the code paths under discussion? On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com

Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 10:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 19:42 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:32:59PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: +static void error_bad_sort_config(const char *err, va_list

Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 10:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 19:42 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:32:59PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: +static void error_bad_sort_config(const char *err, va_list

Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: After all, it seems to me that the one in http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/253346 struck the right balance among various abuses; let's use the error

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 01:33:56PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: I realize that I am reinventing the error-reporting wheel on a sleepy Sunday afternoon without having thought about it much, so there is

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 09:03 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 10:17 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 01:33:56PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: I realize that I am

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 11:17 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 09:03 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: ... Yes, that is fun. I actually think your In 'version:pefname' and 'wersion:refname', we want be able to report

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 12:12 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: I am going to re-submit this with an enum-style return. I am also changing how we parse so that we can correctly report whether the sort function or sort atom is incorrect. Oh, our

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 12:12 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: I am going to re-submit this with an enum-style return. I am also changing how we parse so that we can correctly report whether the sort function or sort atom is incorrect. Oh, our

Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] usage: make error functions a stack

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 15:47 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: extern void set_error_routine(void (*routine)(const char *err, va_list params)); +extern void pop_error_routine(void); pop that undoes set smells somewhat weird. Perhaps we should

Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] usage: make error functions a stack

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 15:47 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: extern void set_error_routine(void (*routine)(const char *err, va_list params)); +extern void pop_error_routine(void); pop that undoes set smells somewhat weird. Perhaps we should

Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 19:42 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:32:59PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: +static void error_bad_sort_config(const char *err, va_list params) +{ + vreportf(warning: tag.sort has , err, params); +} This feels a little like an abuse of the

RE: [Bug] data loss with cyclic alternates

-Original Message- From: Jeff King [mailto:p...@peff.net] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 10:57 PM To: Keller, Jacob E Cc: gits...@pobox.com; dr.kh...@gmail.com; git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bug] data loss with cyclic alternates On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 06:01:46PM +, Keller

RE: [PATCH 3/3 v5] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

-Original Message- From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2014 10:01 AM To: Jeff King Cc: Keller, Jacob E; git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Fri

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command line option will override this configured value, using the exact same syntax. Cc: Jeff King p...@peff.net

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 08:04 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command line option will override this configured value, using the exact same syntax. Cc: Jeff King p...@peff.net

Re: pitfall with empty commits during git rebase

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 12:15 +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: There is an incorrect message when doing git rebase -i remote/branch. I have it only in german, see below. what happend is: #01 make changes on another host #02 copy patchfile to localhost #03 apply patchfile #04 git commit -avs #

Re: [Bug] data loss with cyclic alternates

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 09:01 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Ephrim Khong dr.kh...@gmail.com writes: git seems to have issues with alternates when cycles are present (repo A has B/objects as alternates, B has A/objects as alternates). Yeah, don't do that. A thinks eh, the other guy must

Re: [PATCH 1/3] tag: use skip_prefix instead of magic numbers

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 13:50 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:24:05AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: Make the parsing of the --sort parameter more readable by having skip_prefix keep our pointer up to date. Authored-by: Jeff King p...@peff.net I suspect Junio may just

Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 13:46 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:24:07AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: Updated to include changes due to Junio's feedback. This has not resolved whether we should fail on a configuration error or simply warn. It appears that we actually seem

Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 06:11:08PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote: I personally prefer error out on options, even though it can make it a bit more difficult, though as far as I know unknown fields simply warn or are ignored. (ie: old

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v4] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 11:29 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: This is not how the rest of the current tests work. I will submit a patch which fixes up the current --sort tests (but not every test, for now) as well. I do not want to pile more

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 13:51 -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command line option will override this configured value, using the exact same syntax. Cc: Jeff King p...@peff.net Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com ---

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 17:06 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:51:35PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: + if (!strcmp(var, tag.sort)) { + if (!value) + return config_error_nonbool(var); + status = parse_sort_string(value, tag_sort); +

Re: [PATCH 3/3 v5] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 14:54 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:24:07AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: Updated to include changes due to Junio's feedback. This has not resolved whether we should fail on a configuration error or simply

Re: [PATCH 3/3] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 15:17 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:51:35PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: + if (!strcmp(var, tag.sort)) { + if (!value) + return config_error_nonbool(var); + status =

Re: [PATCH 1/3] tag: use skip_prefix instead of magic numbers

On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 15:44 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: From: Jeff King p...@peff.net Make the parsing of the --sort parameter more readable by having skip_prefix keep our pointer up to date. Signed-off-by: Jeff King p...@peff.net

Re: [PATCH v2] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 00:07 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 03:36:51PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: +static int parse_sort_string(const char *arg) +{ + int sort = 0; + int flags = 0; + + if (*arg == '-') { + flags |= REVERSE_SORT; + arg++;

Re: [PATCH] makefile: add ability to run specific test files

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 21:14 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote: On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something you need to fix, instead

Re: [PATCH v2] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:59:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jeff King p...@peff.net writes: I know this is existing code you are moving, but I noticed it looks ripe for using skip_prefix. Perhaps while we are in the area we

Re: [PATCH] makefile: add ability to run specific test files

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 04:14 +, Junio C Hamano wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Keller, Jacob E jacob.e.kel...@intel.com wrote: On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something you need to fix, instead

Re: [PATCH v4] linuxptp: add phc_ctl program to help debug PHC devices

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:20 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: This is an updated version of a script I wrote a couple years ago for I suspect that this is not for us ;-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body

Re: [PATCH] gitignore: add .version as this is generated during a make

On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:13 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Hi, Jacob Keller wrote: Subject: gitignore: add .version as this is generated during a make What program generates that file? When I build on a Debian machine, I get $ make [...] SUBDIR templates

t3200-branch.sh number 102 fails when run under make test

Hello, I recently cloned the master branch of the git repo, and when I ran make test, it fails on test 102 of the t3200-branch.sh test cases. not ok 102 - tracking with unexpected .fetch refspec # # rm -rf a b c d # git init a # ( #

Re: t3200-branch.sh number 102 fails when run under make test

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 13:37 -0700, Jacob E Keller wrote: Hello, I recently cloned the master branch of the git repo, and when I ran make test, it fails on test 102 of the t3200-branch.sh test cases. not ok 102 - tracking with unexpected .fetch refspec # # rm -rf a b c d #

Re: t3200-branch.sh number 102 fails when run under make test

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 16:54 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 08:37:51PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote: I recently cloned the master branch of the git repo, and when I ran make test, it fails on test 102 of the t3200-branch.sh test cases. Just a guess, but try reverting

Re: [PATCH] remote-curl: do not complain on EOF from parent git

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 17:20 -0400, Jeff King wrote: The parent git process is supposed to send us an empty line to indicate that the conversation is over. However, the parent process may die() if there is a problem with the operaiton (e.g., we try to fetch a ref that does not exist).

Re: [PATCH] tag: support configuring --sort via .gitconfig

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 17:58 -0400, Jeff King wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 02:21:00PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote: Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command line option will override this configured value, using the exact same syntax. This makes sense, and

Re: [PATCH] makefile: add ability to run specific test files

On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 15:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: Jacob Keller jacob.e.kel...@intel.com writes: Running a specific test file manually does not obtain the exact environment setup by the Makefile. What kind of things are missing, exactly? Perhaps that is something you need to fix,

RE: [StGit PATCH] Fix dirty index errors when resolving conflicts

-Original Message- From: Zane Bitter [mailto:zbit...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 6:57 AM To: git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Keller, Jacob E; Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P; catalin.mari...@gmail.com Subject: [StGit PATCH] Fix dirty index errors when resolving conflicts The patch