On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 02:18:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov writes:
>
> > I'm waiting so long for main patch to be at least queued to pu, that I'm
> > now a bit frustrated and ready to do something not related to main goal :)
>
> Perhaps the first step
Kirill Smelkov writes:
> I'm waiting so long for main patch to be at least queued to pu, that I'm
> now a bit frustrated and ready to do something not related to main goal :)
Perhaps the first step would be to stop putting multiple patches in
a single e-mail buried after a few
Junio, first of all thanks for feedback,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 01:40:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Kirill Smelkov writes:
>
> > > From: Kirill Smelkov
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pack-objects: Make sure use_bitmap_index is not active
> > under
> >
Kirill Smelkov writes:
> > From: Kirill Smelkov
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] pack-objects: Make sure use_bitmap_index is not active
> under
> --local or --honor-pack-keep
>
> Since 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects) there
> are two codepaths
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 02:40:25PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:52:17PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > > So I think if you were to repeatedly "git repack -adb" over time, you
> > > would get worse and worse ordering as objects are added to the
> > > repository.
> >
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 02:40:25PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > @@ -1052,6 +1053,9 @@ static int add_object_entry_from_bitmap(const
> > unsigned char *sha1,
> > {
> > uint32_t index_pos;
> >
> > + if (local && has_loose_object_nonlocal(sha1))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > if
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:52:17PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > So I think if you were to repeatedly "git repack -adb" over time, you
> > would get worse and worse ordering as objects are added to the
> > repository.
>
> Jeff, first of all thanks for clarifying.
>
> So it is
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 05:29:07AM -0600, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 08:06:49PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > > Anyway, please find below updated patch according to your suggestion.
> > > Hope it is ok now.
> >
> > Ping. Is the patch ok or something needs to be improved
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 08:06:49PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > Anyway, please find below updated patch according to your suggestion.
> > Hope it is ok now.
>
> Ping. Is the patch ok or something needs to be improved still?
Sorry, I'm traveling and haven't carefully reviewed it yet. It's
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:52:16PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:26:53AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 01:38:55PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> >
> > > > - we will not compute the same write order (which is based on
> > > > traversal
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:26:53AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 01:38:55PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > > - we will not compute the same write order (which is based on
> > > traversal order), leading to packs that have less efficient cache
> > >
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:08:08PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > Or are we fine with my arguments about recency order staying the same
> > when using bitmap reachability index for object graph traversal, and this
> > way the patch is fine to go in as it is?
>
> Since there is no reply I
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 01:38:55PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> > - we will not compute the same write order (which is based on
> > traversal order), leading to packs that have less efficient cache
> > characteristics
>
> I agree the order can be not exactly the same. Still if
On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 01:38:55PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> Peff first of all thanks for feedback,
>
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:52:23PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:09:17PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> >
> > > Starting from 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps
Peff first of all thanks for feedback,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 04:52:23PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:09:17PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
>
> > Starting from 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects)
> > if a repository has bitmap index, pack-objects can
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:09:17PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
> Starting from 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects)
> if a repository has bitmap index, pack-objects can nicely speedup
> "Counting objects" graph traversal phase. That however was done only for
> case when
Starting from 6b8fda2d (pack-objects: use bitmaps when packing objects)
if a repository has bitmap index, pack-objects can nicely speedup
"Counting objects" graph traversal phase. That however was done only for
case when resultant pack is sent to stdout, not written into a file.
We can teach
17 matches
Mail list logo