Brandon Williams wrote:
> If so I suggest we move away from the term "pack" protocol. Mostly
> because maybe at some future date we don't only want to communicate to
> transfer packs. So at the risk of bikeshedding (and because naming is
> hard) I think we should begin talking about the over
On 07/24, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Brandon Williams writes:
>
> >> Not about this patch, but I wonder if an organization along the
> >> following lines would make sense?
> >>
> >> 1. Rename pack-protocol.txt to protocol-v1.txt. Rename
> >> protocol-v2.txt to pack-protocol.txt.
> >>
> >>
Brandon Williams writes:
>> Not about this patch, but I wonder if an organization along the
>> following lines would make sense?
>>
>> 1. Rename pack-protocol.txt to protocol-v1.txt. Rename
>> protocol-v2.txt to pack-protocol.txt.
>>
>> 2. Make pack-protocol.txt self-contained, and
On 07/23, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brandon Williams wrote:
>
> > --- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> > @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ Each Extra Parameter takes the form of `=` or
> > ``.
> >
> > Servers that receive any such Extra
Hi,
Brandon Williams wrote:
> --- a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
> @@ -50,7 +50,8 @@ Each Extra Parameter takes the form of `=` or
> ``.
>
> Servers that receive any such Extra Parameters MUST ignore all
> unrecognized keys.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams
---
Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
b/Documentation/technical/pack-protocol.txt
index 7fee6b780a..25acd9edb1 100644
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
