Re: [PATCH] t3200-branch.sh: use "--set-upstream-to" in test

2018-06-06 Thread Kaartic Sivaraam
On Tuesday 05 June 2018 04:54 PM, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > Though arguably the test name could be more descriptive and tell why > it should fail. > That's arguable, indeed. I was about to send a patch that gives a better description for the test. I didn't do it as I started wondering, Is it even

Re: [PATCH] t3200-branch.sh: use "--set-upstream-to" in test

2018-06-05 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote: > > Change deprecated "--set-upstream" branch option to > > preferred "--set-upstream-to". > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day > > > > --- > > > > i'm assuming this should use "--set-upstream-to" as do all the > > others. > > I don't think so, see

Re: [PATCH] t3200-branch.sh: use "--set-upstream-to" in test

2018-06-05 Thread SZEDER Gábor
> Change deprecated "--set-upstream" branch option to > preferred "--set-upstream-to". > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day > > --- > > i'm assuming this should use "--set-upstream-to" as do all the > others. I don't think so, see 52668846ea (builtin/branch: stop supporting the

[PATCH] t3200-branch.sh: use "--set-upstream-to" in test

2018-06-05 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Change deprecated "--set-upstream" branch option to preferred "--set-upstream-to". Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day --- i'm assuming this should use "--set-upstream-to" as do all the others. diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh index 69ea8202f4..ef887a0b32 100755 ---