On Tuesday 05 June 2018 04:54 PM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
>
> Though arguably the test name could be more descriptive and tell why
> it should fail.
>
That's arguable, indeed. I was about to send a patch that gives a better
description for the test. I didn't do it as I started wondering, Is it
even
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > Change deprecated "--set-upstream" branch option to
> > preferred "--set-upstream-to".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > ---
> >
> > i'm assuming this should use "--set-upstream-to" as do all the
> > others.
>
> I don't think so, see
> Change deprecated "--set-upstream" branch option to
> preferred "--set-upstream-to".
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
>
> ---
>
> i'm assuming this should use "--set-upstream-to" as do all the
> others.
I don't think so, see 52668846ea (builtin/branch: stop supporting the
Change deprecated "--set-upstream" branch option to
preferred "--set-upstream-to".
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
i'm assuming this should use "--set-upstream-to" as do all the
others.
diff --git a/t/t3200-branch.sh b/t/t3200-branch.sh
index 69ea8202f4..ef887a0b32 100755
---
4 matches
Mail list logo