On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
>> Dennis Kaarsemaker writes:
>>
>>> OK, so here it is as a proper patch.
>
> Here is what I queued. Duy, what do you think? It seems OK to me.
Ack.
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Dennis Kaarsemaker writes:
>
>> OK, so here it is as a proper patch.
Here is what I queued. Duy, what do you think? It seems OK to me.
Thanks.
-- >8 --
From: Dennis Kaarsemaker
Date: Wed, 12 Oct
Dennis Kaarsemaker writes:
> OK, so here it is as a proper patch.
>
> D.
>
> diff --git a/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh b/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
> index 4bcc335..2996c38 100755
> --- a/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
> +++ b/t/t2025-worktree-add.sh
> @@ -138,6 +138,14 @@
I have tested this successfully with git 2.10.1 built from source
(failing), then patched as above (passing).
Thanks!
M.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Dennis Kaarsemaker
wrote:
> In bare repositories, get_worktrees() still returns the main repository,
> so git
In bare repositories, get_worktrees() still returns the main repository,
so git worktree list can show it. ignore it in find_shared_symref so we
can still check out the main branch.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Kaarsemaker
---
t/t2025-worktree-add.sh | 8
worktree.c
5 matches
Mail list logo