On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
To connect to the other mail I sent on this thread (in parallel with
yours), do you think git cherrry-pick HEAD HEAD~1 should apply the
commits in the same
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
So all of the above case give the right result in the end as long
as the timestamps are chronological, and case 1) gives the right
result regardless. The other two cases only works in most cases
because the unexpcted sorting when
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
So all of the above case give the right result in the end as long
as the timestamps are chronological, and case 1) gives the right
result regardless. The
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
Makes sense, I'll try to implement it that way. I was afraid that
we would need to call prepare_revision_walk() once first and then
if we afterwards find out that we should not walk, we would need
to call it again without the
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
Makes sense, I'll try to implement it that way. I was afraid that
we would need to call prepare_revision_walk() once first and then
if we afterwards find out
From: Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com
'git cherry-pick' internally sets the --reverse option while walking
revisions, so that 'git cherry-pick branch@{u}..branch' will apply the
revisions starting at the oldest one. If no uninteresing revisions are
given, --no-walk is
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
y...@google.com writes:
From: Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com
'git cherry-pick' internally sets the --reverse option while walking
revisions, so that 'git cherry-pick branch@{u}..branch' will apply
Martin von Zweigbergk martin.von.zweigbe...@gmail.com writes:
To connect to the other mail I sent on this thread (in parallel with
yours), do you think git cherrry-pick HEAD HEAD~1 should apply the
commits in the same order as git cherry-pick HEAD~2..HEAD (which
would give the same result if
8 matches
Mail list logo
