Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote:
If you happen to know that certain entries match the given pathspec,
you could help the caller avoid match_pathspec'ing again by set a bit
in ce_flags.
I currently don't know
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote:
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
Hrm, I played around a bit with this idea, but I couldn't figure out how
to make it work. For it to work we
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote:
As promised, a draft for a documentation for the index api as it is in
this series.
First of all, it may be a good idea to acknowledge
index_state-cache[] as part of the API for now. Not hiding it
simplifies a few
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote:
As promised, a draft for a documentation for the index api as it is in
this series.
First of all, it may be a good idea to acknowledge
index_state-cache[] as part of the API for
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com wrote:
If you happen to know that certain entries match the given pathspec,
you could help the caller avoid match_pathspec'ing again by set a bit
in ce_flags.
I currently don't know which entries do match the pathspec from
Document the new index api and add examples of how it should be used
instead of the old functions directly accessing the index.
Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy pclo...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer t.gumme...@gmail.com
---
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
Hmm.. I was confused
6 matches
Mail list logo