Re: [PATCH v2] rebase -i: improve advice on bad instruction lines

Hi Ralf, On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Ralf Thielow wrote: > 2016-09-07 11:28 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kaarsemaker : > > Hi Ralf, > > > > There are quite a few patch series in flight these days around > > interactive rebase. Have you checked for conflicts with those? > > > > Thanks. I did

Re: [PATCH v2] rebase -i: improve advice on bad instruction lines

Dennis Kaarsemaker writes: > There are quite a few patch series in flight these days around > interactive rebase. Have you checked for conflicts with those? IIRC, Ralf's fix would need to be ported to C version, and when it happens, it won't just be a mere conflict but

Re: [PATCH v2] rebase -i: improve advice on bad instruction lines

2016-09-07 11:28 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kaarsemaker : > Hi Ralf, > > There are quite a few patch series in flight these days around > interactive rebase. Have you checked for conflicts with those? > Thanks. I did not check against 'pu' when I created this patch but I'm able to

Re: [PATCH v2] rebase -i: improve advice on bad instruction lines

Hi Ralf, There are quite a few patch series in flight these days around interactive rebase. Have you checked for conflicts with those? On di, 2016-09-06 at 20:59 +0200, Ralf Thielow wrote: > If we found bad instruction lines in the instruction sheet > of interactive rebase, we give the user

[PATCH v2] rebase -i: improve advice on bad instruction lines

If we found bad instruction lines in the instruction sheet of interactive rebase, we give the user advice on how to fix it. However, we don't tell the user what to do afterwards. Give the user advice to run 'git rebase --continue' after the fix. Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow