On 04/07/2017 01:53 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Michael Haggerty
>> wrote:
>>> Duy, have you looked over my patch series? Since you've been working in
>>> the area, your
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Michael Haggerty
> wrote:
>> Duy, have you looked over my patch series? Since you've been working in
>> the area, your feedback would be very welcome, if you have the
On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> Duy, have you looked over my patch series? Since you've been working in
> the area, your feedback would be very welcome, if you have the time for it.
You probably have guessed my answer based on my lack of response
Ramsay Jones writes:
>> In that sense, Michael's series and Duy's later two series are
>> "tangled" (i.e. shares some common commits that are still not in
>> 'master'). If nd/files-backend-git-dir that is shared among them is
>> ever rebased, all of them need to be
On 02/04/17 04:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ramsay Jones writes:
>
>>> I am getting the impression that the files-backend thing as well as
>>> this topic are ready for 'next'. Please stop me if I missed something
>>> in these topics (especially the other one) that
Ramsay Jones writes:
>> I am getting the impression that the files-backend thing as well as
>> this topic are ready for 'next'. Please stop me if I missed something
>> in these topics (especially the other one) that needs updating
>> before that happens.
>
> Hmm,
On 31/03/17 17:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty writes:
>
>> This version literally only contains a few commit message changes and
>> one minor comment changes relative to v1. The code is identical. I
>> wasn't sure whether it is even worth sending this patch
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:10:58PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> * I added a long blurb about the removal of an internal consistency
> check in the commit message for
>
> [18/20] commit_packed_refs(): use reference iteration
Thanks, the explanation there makes sense.
I think this
On 03/31/2017 06:01 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty writes:
>
>> This version literally only contains a few commit message changes and
>> one minor comment changes relative to v1. The code is identical. I
>> wasn't sure whether it is even worth sending this
Michael Haggerty writes:
> This version literally only contains a few commit message changes and
> one minor comment changes relative to v1. The code is identical. I
> wasn't sure whether it is even worth sending this patch series to the
> ML again; Junio, if you'd prefer I
This is v2 of this patch series. Thanks to Peff, Junio, Stefan and
Ævar for their comments about v1 [1].
This version literally only contains a few commit message changes and
one minor comment changes relative to v1. The code is identical. I
wasn't sure whether it is even worth sending this patch
11 matches
Mail list logo