On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:29 AM Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:23 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
> > > +* cache-tree would be invalidated and we would never get here
> > > +* in the first place.
> > > +*/
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) {
> > > +
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 8:23 PM Elijah Newren wrote:
> > diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c
> > index a32ddee159..ba3d2e947e 100644
> > --- a/unpack-trees.c
> > +++ b/unpack-trees.c
> > @@ -644,6 +644,102 @@ static inline int are_same_oid(struct name_entry
> > *name_j, struct name_entry
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:39 PM Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> From: Duy Nguyen
>
> In order to merge one or many trees with the index, unpack-trees code
> walks multiple trees in parallel with the index and performs n-way
> merge. If we find out at start of a directory that all trees are the
>
From: Duy Nguyen
In order to merge one or many trees with the index, unpack-trees code
walks multiple trees in parallel with the index and performs n-way
merge. If we find out at start of a directory that all trees are the
same (by comparing OID) and cache-tree happens to be available for
that
4 matches
Mail list logo
