On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 07:45:01AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
In the earlier review, I mentioned making this per-service, but I see
that is not the case here. Do you have an argument against doing so?
Perhaps then I misunderstood your intention. By reminding me of the
receive-pack
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 07:45:01AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
In the earlier review, I mentioned making this per-service, but I see
that is not the case here. Do you have an argument against doing so?
Perhaps then I misunderstood your intention. By
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45:37AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Teach upload-pack and receive-pack to omit some refs from their
initial advertisements by paying attention to the transfer.hiderefs
multi-valued configuration variable. Any ref that is under the
hierarchies listed on the value
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:45:37AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Teach upload-pack and receive-pack to omit some refs from their
initial advertisements by paying attention to the transfer.hiderefs
multi-valued configuration variable. Any ref that is under the
Teach upload-pack and receive-pack to omit some refs from their
initial advertisements by paying attention to the transfer.hiderefs
multi-valued configuration variable. Any ref that is under the
hierarchies listed on the value of this variable is excluded from
responses to requests made by
5 matches
Mail list logo
