RE: A basic question - Thanks to all responders

2012-10-12 Thread Jim Vahl
Fellow developers, Thanks to all who responded to my “basic question”. I now have a much better idea (actually 2) of how releases can be documented when using git for version control. I appreciate your taking the time to help me on the learning path. Jim Vahl -- To unsubscribe from

RE: A basic question

2012-10-11 Thread Jim Vahl
: A basic question On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 11:03 -0700, Jim Vahl wrote: All, Our company is researching version control software, something which we have not used previously. I have a very basic question about git which I have not been able to answer from reading. As I understand it, a git

Re: A basic question

2012-10-11 Thread Dov Grobgeld
- From: Drew Northup [mailto:drew.nort...@maine.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:37 PM To: Jim Vahl Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; 'Skot Davis' Subject: Re: A basic question On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 11:03 -0700, Jim Vahl wrote: All, Our company is researching version control software

Re: A basic question

2012-10-11 Thread Enrico Weigelt
1) Does git have a built-in way to get a list of all of the most recently committed files only at a given point in time, thus automatically recording the revisions of all of the component files of a release? There is no concept of per-file revisions in git. But you can check which ones

Re: A basic question

2012-10-11 Thread Sitaram Chamarty
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Jim Vahl j...@wmdb.com wrote: Drew, Thanks for responding to my email! Yes, I did read most of the Book, although I admit that I skimmed over some of the more technical parts. There is still a key part of how git is used in a commercial environment which I

Re: A basic question

2012-10-11 Thread PJ Weisberg
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jim Vahl j...@wmdb.com wrote: 1) Does git have a built-in way to get a list of all of the most recently committed files only at a given point in time, thus automatically recording the revisions of all of the component files of a release? This implies that