Fwd: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

2013-08-13 Thread David Jeske
On Aug 12, 2013 11:06 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, David Jeske dav...@gmail.com wrote: Is there currently any way to say hey, git, show me what commits are dangling that might be lost in the reflog? How do you define dangling commits? Any

Re: Fwd: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

2013-08-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
David Jeske dav...@gmail.com writes: When you do git commit --amend, the current commit will become dangling (in the sense that it's not referred by any ref, but the commit exists) and those are just noise in my opinion. This is *exactly* my point. There is no way to distinguish a commit

Re: Fwd: ephemeral-branches instead of detached-head?

2013-08-13 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes: David Jeske dav...@gmail.com writes: When you do git commit --amend, the current commit will become dangling (in the sense that it's not referred by any ref, but the commit exists) and those are just noise in my opinion. This is *exactly* my point.