On 6/7/2017 5:46 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
On 6/2/2017 7:06 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I don't have time to update the perf test now or dig into it, but most
of what you're describing in this mail doesn't at all match with
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/2017 7:06 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't have time to update the perf test now or dig into it, but most
>> of what you're describing in this mail doesn't at all match with the
>> ad-hoc tests I ran in
>>
>> https://
On 6/2/2017 7:06 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
I don't have time to update the perf test now or dig into it, but most
of what you're describing in this mail doesn't at all match with the
ad-hoc tests I ran in
https://public-inbox.org/git/CACBZZX5e58bWuf3NdDYTxu2KyZj29hHONzN=rp-7vxd8nur...
On 6/2/2017 5:44 PM, David Turner wrote:
BTW, a medium-sized (~250k files across 40k dirs) synthetic repo is available
over bittorrent at:
http://bitmover.com/2015-04-03-1M-git-bare.tar.bz2.torrent
I tried Ævar's perf test with that (on a beefy laptop with SSD), and got
significantly slower
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:46:19AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> What I'm referring to is not a limitation of git (we'll always be able
> to turn off core.fsmonitor), but a limitation of the perf framework.
> There's no way to run a test like this:
>
> ./run master next -- p*.sh
>
On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
>
>> This is WIP code for the reasons explained in the setup comments,
>> unfortunately the perf code doesn't easily allow you to run different
>> setup code for different versions you're testing. This test w
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes:
> This is WIP code for the reasons explained in the setup comments,
> unfortunately the perf code doesn't easily allow you to run different
> setup code for different versions you're testing. This test will stop
> working if the fsmonitor is merged into the master
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:44 PM, David Turner wrote:
> BTW, a medium-sized (~250k files across 40k dirs) synthetic repo is available
> over bittorrent at:
> http://bitmover.com/2015-04-03-1M-git-bare.tar.bz2.torrent
Can you seed this please? I've been trying to download that since
yesterday, sti
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
>
> On 6/2/2017 6:28 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>> Add a performance test for the new core.fsmonitor facility using the
>> sample query-fsmonitor hook.
>>
>> This is WIP code for the reasons explained in the setup comments,
>> unfortun
On 6/2/2017 6:28 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Add a performance test for the new core.fsmonitor facility using the
sample query-fsmonitor hook.
This is WIP code for the reasons explained in the setup comments,
unfortunately the perf code doesn't easily allow you to run different
setup co
BTW, a medium-sized (~250k files across 40k dirs) synthetic repo is available
over bittorrent at:
http://bitmover.com/2015-04-03-1M-git-bare.tar.bz2.torrent
I tried Ævar's perf test with that (on a beefy laptop with SSD), and got
significantly slower results with bp/fsmonitor:
Test
11 matches
Mail list logo
