Re: [PATCH 0/3] Port git-add--interactive.perl:status_cmd to C

Hi Daniel, On Fri, 5 May 2017, Daniel Ferreira (theiostream) wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: > > > But maybe you want to keep the naming a little more consistent with > > the Perl script, e.g. instead of calling the function > >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Port git-add--interactive.perl:status_cmd to C

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > But maybe you want to keep the naming a little more consistent with the > Perl script, e.g. instead of calling the function `print_modified()` call > it already `list()` (and rename it later to

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Port git-add--interactive.perl:status_cmd to C

Hi Daniel, On Fri, 5 May 2017, Daniel Ferreira wrote: > Hm, it looks like my GSoC project won't be in the Git organization, Yeah, rumors have it that you were quite a popular student and several organizations fought bloody wars over getting you... ;-) > although I'm still interested in going

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Port git-add--interactive.perl:status_cmd to C

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Daniel Ferreira wrote: >> This series introduces git-add-interactive--helper (or should it be >> called git-add--interactive--helper?) as a builtin capable of doing >> what the Perl script's status_cmd() would do.

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Port git-add--interactive.perl:status_cmd to C

Hi, On Fri, 5 May 2017, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Daniel Ferreira wrote: > > This series introduces git-add-interactive--helper (or should it be > > called git-add--interactive--helper?) as a builtin capable of doing > > what the Perl

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Port git-add--interactive.perl:status_cmd to C

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Daniel Ferreira wrote: > This series introduces git-add-interactive--helper (or should it be > called git-add--interactive--helper?) as a builtin capable of doing > what the Perl script's status_cmd() would do. The existing script is