Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
My reading of the earlier parts of the series is that Linus wanted
us never dwim for-upstream to tags/for-upstream or any other ref
that happens to point at the same commit as for-upstream you have.
The
looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
[mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
git version 1.8.3.1
[mst@robin qemu]$ git --version
git version 2.0.0.rc1.18.gac53fc6.dirty
[mst@robin qemu]$
[mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git request-pull origin/master
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
[mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
git version 1.8.3.1
[mst@robin qemu]$ git --version
git version 2.0.0.rc1.18.gac53fc6.dirty
[mst@robin qemu]$
[mst@robin qemu]$
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
[mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
git version 1.8.3.1
[mst@robin qemu]$ git --version
git version 2.0.0.rc1.18.gac53fc6.dirty
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:13:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
[mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
git version 1.8.3.1
Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com writes:
My reading of the earlier parts of the series is that Linus wanted
us never dwim for-upstream to tags/for-upstream or any other ref
that happens to point at the same commit as for-upstream you have.
The changes done for that purpose covered various
6 matches
Mail list logo
