> To: 'Christian Couder' <christian.cou...@gmail.com>
> Cc: 'Jeff King' <p...@peff.net>; 'git' <git@vger.kernel.org>; 'Johannes
> Schindelin' <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>; Ben Peart
> <benpe...@microsoft.com>
> Subject: RE: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs o
.net>; 'git' <git@vger.kernel.org>; 'Johannes
> Schindelin' <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>; Ben Peart
> <benpe...@microsoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand
>
> I'd like to point to two (or rather one and a half) solutions t
I'd like to point to two (or rather one and a half) solutions that I got
aware of when watching streaming of "Git Merge 2017"[0]. There should
be here people who were there; and hopefully video of those presentations
and slides / notes would be soon available.
[0]: http://git-merge.com/
First
<p...@peff.net>; git <git@vger.kernel.org>; Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schinde...@gmx.de>
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand
>
> (Sorry for the late reply and thanks to Dscho for pointing me to this thread.)
>
> On Tue, Jan 1
(Sorry for the late reply and thanks to Dscho for pointing me to this thread.)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Ben Peart wrote:
>> From: Jeff King [mailto:p...@peff.net]
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:52:53AM -0500, Ben Peart wrote:
>>
>> > Clone and fetch will pass a
@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Ben Peart <peart...@gmail.com>; Shawn Pearce
> <spea...@spearce.org>; git <git@vger.kernel.org>;
> benpe...@microsoft.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Martin Fick &
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Martin Fick wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 04:50:13 PM Ben Peart wrote:
>> While large files can be a real problem, our biggest issue
>> today is having a lot (millions!) of source files when
>> any individual developer only needs a
On Tuesday, January 17, 2017 04:50:13 PM Ben Peart wrote:
> While large files can be a real problem, our biggest issue
> today is having a lot (millions!) of source files when
> any individual developer only needs a small percentage of
> them. Git with 3+ million local files just doesn't
>
...@microsoft.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Ben Peart <peart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Goal
> >
> >
> > To be able to better handle repos with many files that any in
> To: Ben Peart <peart...@gmail.com>
> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; Ben Peart <ben.pe...@microsoft.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC] Add support for downloading blobs on demand
>
> This is an issue I've thought a lot about. So apologies in advance that this
> response turned out a
This is an issue I've thought a lot about. So apologies in advance that
this response turned out a bit long. :)
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:52:53AM -0500, Ben Peart wrote:
> Design
> ~~
>
> Clone and fetch will pass a �--lazy-clone� flag (open to a better name
> here) similar to �--depth�
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Ben Peart wrote:
>
> Goal
>
>
> To be able to better handle repos with many files that any individual
> developer doesn’t need it would be nice if clone/fetch only brought down
> those files that were actually needed.
>
> To enable that,
Goal
To be able to better handle repos with many files that any individual
developer doesnt need it would be nice if clone/fetch only brought down
those files that were actually needed.
To enable that, we are proposing adding a flag to clone/fetch that will
instruct the server to limit
13 matches
Mail list logo