On 11/28/2012 01:27 AM, Jeff King wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 06:30:17PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
At 18:07 -0500 27 Nov 2012, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
PS I also think the OP's sockpuppet creates innocuous bugfix above is
easier said than done. We do not have SHA-1 collisions
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:09:31AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Michael Hirshleifer 111...@caltech.edu
wrote:
Evil Guy creates 2 files, 1 evil and 1 innocuous, with the same SHA-1
checksum (including Git header). Mr. Evil creates a local branch with an
Evil Guy creates 2 files, 1 evil and 1 innocuous, with the same SHA-1
checksum (including Git header). Mr. Evil creates a local branch with an
innocuous name like “test-bugfix”, and adds a commit containing a
reference to the evil file. Separately, using a sockpuppet, Evil Guy
creates an
I don't think there is an issue the way you have tried to describe
this scenario.
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Michael Hirshleifer 111...@caltech.edu wrote:
Evil Guy creates 2 files, 1 evil and 1 innocuous, with the same SHA-1
checksum (including Git header). Mr. Evil creates a local branch
4 matches
Mail list logo
