> -Original Message-
> From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 4:32 PM
> To: Ben Peart <peart...@gmail.com>
> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; pclo...@gmail.com; 'Ben Peart'
> <benpe...@microsoft.com>
> Subject: R
"Ben Peart" writes:
> I completely agree that optimizing within merge_working_tree would provide
> more opportunities for optimization. I can certainly move the test into
> that function as a first step.
Note that "optimizing more" was not the primary point of my
response.
> -Original Message-
> From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 5:55 PM
> To: Ben Peart <peart...@gmail.com>
> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org; pclo...@gmail.com; Ben Peart
> <benpe...@microsoft.com>
> Subject: R
Ben Peart writes:
> @@ -802,6 +806,87 @@ static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old,
> struct commit *new)
> free(refs.objects);
> }
>
> +static int needs_working_tree_merge(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
> + const struct branch_info *old,
> +
4 matches
Mail list logo