On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:15 AM, David Lang da...@lang.hm wrote:
Using a web browser requires connectivity at the time you are doing the
review.
Mailing list based reviews can be done at times when you don't have
connectivity.
I am not against email-based reviews but I'd like to point out
would be interested in.
I have spoken to Shawn Pearce (gerrit project lead, google) and he
said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this.
Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than
any other review methods. I've even
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Felipe Contreras
Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than
any other review methods. I've even blogged about it and all the
reasons[1]. Gerrit is better than
be interested in.
I have spoken to Shawn Pearce (gerrit project lead, google) and he
said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this.
Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than
any other review methods. I've even blogged
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Requiring everyone to use a web browser would limit the amount of ways
people can review patches.
I don't see that as a limitation as I think everyone has access to a
web browser these days, don't have?
How
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Requiring everyone to use a web browser would limit the amount of ways
people can review patches.
I don't see that as a limitation as
I understand from the feedback that gerrit should get better on making
it possible to review code via e-mail, as pointed out in Nguyen's
mail, a flow like Shawn mentioned[1] can be a good solution.
FWIW, I can fetch the change(s) from gerrit I am interested in and
review it any time I want. I
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, Deniz Türkoglu wrote:
I understand from the feedback that gerrit should get better on making
it possible to review code via e-mail, as pointed out in Nguyen's
mail, a flow like Shawn mentioned[1] can be a good solution.
FWIW, I can fetch the change(s) from gerrit I am
your thoughts on this.
Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than
any other review methods. I've even blogged about it and all the
reasons[1]. Gerrit is better than bugzilla, but it still requires a
web browser, and logging in.
I love to be able to just hit 'reply' with my
, google) and he
said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this.
Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than
any other review methods. I've even blogged about it and all the
reasons[1]. Gerrit is better than bugzilla, but it still
, google) and he
said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this.
Personally I think reviews on the mailing list is far superior than
any other review methods. I've even blogged about it and all the
reasons[1]. Gerrit is better than bugzilla, but it still
Thiago Farina tfrans...@gmail.com wrote:
Requiring a web browser is a huge requirement, ham??
No, but requiring reviews and discussions typed in the browser is.
Pardon terseness, typo and HTML from a tablet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a
Deniz Türkoglu wrote:
I have spoken to Shawn Pearce (gerrit project lead, google) and he
said he is OK with hosting the gerrit instance.
I would like to hear your thoughts on this.
I personally think email is by far the best interface for patches,
reviews, and discussions. Git patches are
13 matches
Mail list logo
