Re: Why BLAKE2?

2017-02-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Markus Trippelsdorf writes ("Re: Why BLAKE2?"): > On 2017.02.27 at 13:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > For brevity I will write `SHA' for hashing with SHA-1, using current > > unqualified object names, and `BLAKE' for hasing with BLAKE2b, using > > H object names

Re: Why BLAKE2?

2017-02-27 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2017.02.27 at 13:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > For brevity I will write `SHA' for hashing with SHA-1, using current > unqualified object names, and `BLAKE' for hasing with BLAKE2b, using > H object names. Why do you choose BLAKE2? SHA-2 is generally considered still fine and would be the