Markus Trippelsdorf writes ("Re: Why BLAKE2?"):
> On 2017.02.27 at 13:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > For brevity I will write `SHA' for hashing with SHA-1, using current
> > unqualified object names, and `BLAKE' for hasing with BLAKE2b, using
> > H object names
On 2017.02.27 at 13:00 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> For brevity I will write `SHA' for hashing with SHA-1, using current
> unqualified object names, and `BLAKE' for hasing with BLAKE2b, using
> H object names.
Why do you choose BLAKE2? SHA-2 is generally considered still fine and
would be the
2 matches
Mail list logo