Re: [gitorious] Changes to our branching model

2012-10-17 Thread Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
I've started pushing content to http://www.getgitorious.com/documentation now (the new official doc is very much a work in progress but we're gonna keep pushing content to it over the coming weeks and months). The new branching model is present under

Re: [gitorious] Changes to our branching model

2012-10-16 Thread Christian Johansen
My one suggestion is to make this policy crystal clear to new developers. Whenever I write a patch for a project I want to know what branch do I base this on in order to get it accepted ASAP? If you make it very clear in the HACKING file, and in the wiki, that patches should be proposed

Re: [gitorious] Changes to our branching model

2012-10-16 Thread Thomas Kjeldahl Nilsson
On it. I'm starting to migrate doc/content to http://www.getgitorious.com/documentation later this week, will move it there. cheers, Thomas On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Christian Johansen christ...@cjohansen.nowrote: My one suggestion is to make this policy crystal clear to new

[gitorious] Changes to our branching model

2012-10-15 Thread Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
Dear list, Since the Gitorious project started, the master branch has been where most development has been happening; and at the same time we have tried to keep the master branch stable enough to be used for deployment in a production environment. In early 2011, we started creating stable releases

Re: [gitorious] Changes to our branching model

2012-10-15 Thread Ken Dreyer
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote: What do you think? Sounds straightforward to me. Thanks for outlining this. My one suggestion is to make this policy crystal clear to new developers. Whenever I write a patch for a project I want to know

Re: [gitorious] Changes to our branching model

2012-10-15 Thread Marius Mårnes Mathiesen
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote: On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Marius Mårnes Mathiesen marius.mathie...@gmail.com wrote: What do you think? Sounds straightforward to me. Thanks for outlining this. My one suggestion is to make this policy crystal